|
How can Leader-Subordinate Critical Thinking Congruence Affect Creative Problem-solving? Chain Mediation and the Intervention Effect of Job Creativity Requirement
Tu Xingyong, Zhang Qiao, Dong Yanan, Jiang Jing, Yang Baiyin
2025, 37 (4):
142-155.
Critical thinking is a basic dimension of the cognitive spectrum and is considered to be the most recognizable label for improving the creative output of subordinates. However, previous studies have ignored the differential effects and internal mechanisms of different combinations of “leader-subordinate” critical thinking on subordinates’ creative problem-solving. In order to gain a lasting competitive advantage in this “innovation-driven” context, we need to re-understand critical thinking and the constructive role it generates. Because critical thinking is not isolated from the field of Chinese organization and management. On the contrary, it provides certain annotations for individual behavior. In this sense, taking its essence, insight and glow the influence of critical thinking on individual behavior is different from the past, which has certain theoretical value and practical enlightenment. In order to remedy these deficiencies and fully reveal the different demands driven by cross-linking of thought, this paper takes the cognitive consistency theory as the upper theory by introducing the perspective of leader-subordinate matching, establishes a chain mediation model in which exploration behavior and resource acquisition act on subordinates’ creative problem-solving through subordinates’ critical thinking and leaders’ critical thinking, and describes in detail the moderating role of creative work requirements in this model. Based on the job demand-resource theory, this paper reveals the conditional intervention mechanism of creative work requirements in the process of improving creative problem-solving, responds to the situational differences generated by creative results, and provides further empirical support for high-quality improvement of creative problem-solving and accumulates local evidence. Polynomial regression and response surface analysis techniques are applied, a multi-source time lag is designed to reduce common method bias, by analyzing 269 leaders and employees paired data at two time points. It is found that: the higher the consistency between the leader’s critical thinking and the subordinate’s critical thinking, the higher the subordinate’s exploratory behavior. Compared with the situation of “high leader critical thinking and low subordinate critical thinking”, the exploration behavior of subordinates is not significantly increased in the case of “low leader critical thinking and high subordinate critical thinking”. The consistency of critical thinking between leaders and subordinates influences creative problem-solving through the chain mediation of exploration behavior and resource acquisition. Job creativity requirement plays a moderating role in the relationship between resource acquisition and creative problem-solving, and further, it has a conditional effect on the consistency of critical thinking between leaders and subordinates through the chain mediation of exploration behavior and resource acquisition. This paper explores and details the potential mechanism of how different combinations of leader-subordinate critical thinking influence creative problem-solving, provides more explanation paths for the intertwine drive of leadership and subordinates, and provides inspiration for the innovative competition of employee exploration behavior and creative problem-solving.
References |
Related Articles |
Metrics
|