悖论认知、制度环境与绿色绩效的关系研究

›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 76-85.

悖论认知、制度环境与绿色绩效的关系研究

魏泽盛¹, 杨屹¹, 魏泽龙²

1. 西安理工大学经济与管理学院, 西安 710054;
2. 西安交通大学管理学院, 西安 710049

收稿日期:2016-07-05 出版日期:2018-11-28 发布日期:2018-11-22
作者简介:魏泽盛,西安理工大学经济与管理学院硕士研究生;杨屹,西安理工大学经济与管理学院教授,硕士生导师,博士;魏泽龙,西安交通大学管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金西部项目（15XJL009）。

Paradox Cognition, Institutional Environment and Green Performance

Wei Zesheng¹, YangYi¹, Wei Zelong²

1. College of Economics and Management, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710054;
2. School of Management, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049

Received:2016-07-05 Online:2018-11-28 Published:2018-11-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在悖论理论和制度理论的基础上，分析了悖论认知对企业绿色绩效的影响、内部技术开发和外部技术获取的中介效应以及制度不完备性和不正当竞争的调节作用。研究提出了7条假设，并利用238家企业的数据进行了验证。研究发现，悖论认知对绿色绩效有促进作用。内部技术开发和外部技术获取对悖论认知与绿色绩效的关系起中介作用。制度不完备性增强了外部技术获取对绿色绩效的促进作用，而削弱了内部技术开发对绿色绩效的促进作用。相反，不正当竞争削弱了外部技术获取对绿色绩效的促进作用，而增强了内部技术开发对绿色绩效的促进作用。

关键词: 悖论认知, 绿色绩效, 内部技术开发, 外部技术获取, 制度不完备性, 不正当竞争

Abstract:

Based on paradox theory and institutional theory, this study investigates the direct effect of paradox cognition on corporate green performance, the mediating effects of internal technology development and external technology acquisition, and the moderating effects of institutional incompleteness and dysfunctional competition. The study proposes 7 hypotheses, and examines them with survey data from 238 firms. We find that paradox cognition has a significant and positive effect on green performance, and this positive effect is mediated by internal technology development and external technology acquisition. Furthermore, we find that institutional incompleteness strengthens the effect of external technology acquisition while weakens the effect of internal technology development on green performance. On the contrast, we find that dysfunctional competition weakens the effect of external technology acquisition while strengthens the effect of internal technology development on green performance.

Key words: paradox cognition, green performance, internal technology development, external technology acquisition, institutional incompleteness, dysfunctional competition

魏泽盛, 杨屹, 魏泽龙. 悖论认知、制度环境与绿色绩效的关系研究[J]. , 2018, 30(11): 76-85.

Wei Zesheng, YangYi, Wei Zelong. Paradox Cognition, Institutional Environment and Green Performance[J]. , 2018, 30(11): 76-85.

参考文献

[1] Walley N., Whitehead B. It's Not Easy Being Green[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1994,72(3):46-51
[2] Roxas B., Coetzer A. Institutional Environment, Managerial Attitudes and Environmental Sustainability Orientation of Small Firms[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2012,111(4):461-476
[3] 魏泽龙,谷盟. 转型情景下企业合法性与绿色绩效的关系研究[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(4):76-84
[4] 贾兴平,刘益. 外部环境、内部资源与企业社会责任[J]. 南开管理评论, 2014,17(6):13-18
[5] 李怡娜,叶飞. 制度压力、绿色环保创新实践与企业绩效关系——基于新制度主义理论和生态现代化理论视角[J]. 科学学研究, 2011,29(12):1884-1894
[6] Russo M. V., Fouts P. A. A Resource-Based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1997,44(3):534-559
[7] Luo X., Bhattacharya C. B. Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2006,70(4):1-18
[8] Bai X., Chang J. N. Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance:The Mediating Role of Marketing Competenceand the Moderating Role of Market Environment[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2015,32(2):505-530
[9] Wei Z. L., Shen H., Zhou K. Z., et al. How Does Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Matter in a Dysfunctional Institutional Environment? Evidence from China[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2017,140(2):1-15
[10] Tang Y., Qian C., Chen G., et al. How CEO Hubris Affects Corporate Social (Ir)responsibility[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2015,36(9):1338-1357
[11] Peng M. W., Li Y., Tian L. W. Tian-Ren-Re-Yi Strategy:An Eastern Perspective[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2016,33(3):695-722
[12] Smith W. K., Lewis M. W. Toward a Theory of Paradox:A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Organizing[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2011,36(2):381-403
[13] Hahn T., Preuss L., Pinkse J., et al. Cognitive Frames in Corporate Sustainability:Managerial Sensemaking with Paradoxical and Business Case Frames[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2014,39(4):463-487
[14] Smith W. K. Dynamic Decision Making:A Model of Senior Leaders Managing Strategic Paradoxes[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2014,57(6):1592-1623
[15] McWilliams A., Siegel D. Corporate Social Responsibility:A Theory of the Firm Perspective[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2001,26(1):117-127
[16] Hart S. L. A Natural Resource-Based View of the Firm[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1995,20(4):986-1014
[17] Russo M. V., Fouts P. A. A Resource-Based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1997,40(3):534-559
[18] Hart S. L., Dowell G. Invited Editorial:A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm:Fifteen Years After[J]. Journal of Management, 2011,37(5):14-64
[19] Chesbrough H. The Era of Open Innovation[J]. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2003,44(3):35-41
[20] Marquis C., Zhang J., Zhou Y. Regulatory Uncertainty and Corporate Responses to Environmental Protection in China[J]. California Management Review, 2011,54(1):39-63
[21] Li H., Atuahene-Gima K. Product Innovation Strategy and the Performance of New Technology Ventures in China[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001,44(6):1123-1134
[22] Li H., Zhang Y. The Role of Managers' Political Networking and Functional Experience in New Venture Performance:Evidence from China's Transition Economy[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007,28(8):791-804
[23] Sheng S., Zhou K. Z., Lessassy L. NPD Speed vs. Innovativeness:The Contingent Impact of Institutional and Market Environments[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2013,66(11):2355-2362
[24] Grimpe C., Kaiser U. Balancing Internal and External Knowledge Acquisition:The Gains and Pains from R&D Outsourcing[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2010,47(8):1483-1509
[25] Tabachnick B. G., Fidell L. S. Using Multivariate Statistics[M]. New York:Harper Collins College Publishers, 1996
[26] Segers A. H. Assessing the Unidimensionality of Measurement:A Paradigm and Illustration within the Context of Information Systems Research[J]. Omega, 1997,25(1):107-121
[27] Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J. Y., et al. Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research:A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003,88(5):879-903
[28] Lindell M. K., Whitney D. J. Accounting for Common Method Variance in Cross-Sectional Research Designs[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001,86(1):114-121
[29] Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986,51(6):1173-1182