Research on the Intermediate Consumption of the Manufacturing Industry in Yangtze River Delta during Its Insertion into the Global Value Chain

Abstract

Abstract:

Intermediate input is also a kind of capital, with an important role in the production process, which can't be ignored. The level of it reflects the quality and efficiency of economic growth in fact. Based on the measurement of the degree to which the manufactur-ing industry in Yangtze River Delta is inserted into the global value chain, this paper has a further study on Jiangsu manufacturing indus-try as an example, analyzes the dynamic evolution characteristics of the intermediate consumption of different manufacturing industries during the insertion into the global value chain, and then seeks explanations from the perspective of technological progress and structural changes. The research shows that:firstly, with respect to Zhejiang and Shanghai, Jiangsu manufacturing industry is inserted into the global value chain to a higher degree. The industries with the higher proportion of the total output value of manufacturing industry, such as communications equipment, computers and other electronic equipment manufacturing industry, chemical industry, metal smelting and rolling processing industry and textile industry, are inserted into the global value chain to a higher degree; secondly, the industries with higher degree of insertion into the global value chain also have higher intermediate consumption; thirdly, compared with imported goods, the intermediate use of national products is greatly influenced by technological progress and structural change; and fourthly, although the technological progress reduces the intermediate consumption of the industries with the higher degree of insertion into the global value chain, the industrial structure upgrading enhances the nature of the intermediate products of these sectors.

Key words: Yangtze River Delta, manufacturing industry, global value chain, intermediate consumption

Yuan Xiaohui, Fan Jin, Xu Xiaohuan. Research on the Intermediate Consumption of the Manufacturing Industry in Yangtze River Delta during Its Insertion into the Global Value Chain[J]. , 2018, 30(5): 127-136.

References

[1] 沈利生,王恒. 增加值率下降意味着什么[J]. 经济研究, 2006,(3):59-66
[2] Jorgenson D. W., Stiroh K. J. Industry-level Productivity and Competitiveness between Canada and the United States[J]. American Economic Review, 2000,90(2):161-167
[3] Jorgenson D. W., Stiroh K. J. Productivity Growth:Current Recovery and Longer-term Trends[J]. American Economic Review, 1999,82(2):109-115
[4] 张向阳,朱有为,孙津. 嵌入全球价值链与产业升级——以苏州和温州两地为例[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2005,(4):63-68
[5] 汪斌,侯茂章. 浙江地方产业集群嵌入全球价值链的若干问题研究[J]. 浙江学刊, 2006,(4):212-216
[6] 丁永健. 面向全球产业价值链的中国制造业升级[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2010
[7] 刘琳. 中国参与全球价值链的测度与分析——基于附加值贸易的考察[J]. 世界经济研究, 2015,(6):71-78
[8] 刘志彪,张少军. 总部经济、产业升级和区域协调——基于全球价值链的分析[J]. 南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学), 2009,46(6):54-42
[9] 刘志彪. 全球价值链中我国外向型经济战略的提升[J]. 中国经济问题, 2007,(1):28-35
[10] 江静,刘志彪. 生产性服务发展与制造业在全球价值链中的升级[J]. 南方经济, 2009,(11):36-44
[11] 张少军,刘志彪. 国内价值链是否对接了全球价值链——基于联立方程模型的经验分析[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2013,(2):14-27
[12] 张少军. 全球价值链与国内价值链——基于投入产出表的新方法[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2009,(4):108-113
[13] 王岚,李宏艳. 中国制造业融入全球价值链路径研究——嵌入位置和增值能力的视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2015,(2):76-88
[14] 段先盛. 中间生产和最终需求对产业结构变迁的影响研究——基于中国投入产出数据的实证检验[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2010,27(11):84-99
[15] 刘伟,蔡志洲. 技术进步、结构变动与改善国民经济中间消耗[J]. 经济研究, 2008,(4):4-14
[16] 周大鹏. 进口服务中间投入对我国制造业全球价值链分工地位的影响研究[J]. 世界经济研究, 2015,(8):27-36
[17] Johnson R. C., Noguera G. Accounting for Intermediates:Production Sharing and Trade in Value Added[J]. Journal of Interna-tional Economics, 2012,86(2):224-236
[18] 何传添,廖欢. 中美服务业中间投入效率的比较研究——基于1995-2011年投入产出表[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2016,32(11):30-40
[19] 王昆,廖涵. 国内投入、中间进口与FDI垂直溢出——基于非竞争型投入产出表的实证研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2011,28(1):89-103
[20] Leontief W. W. Quantitative Input and Output Relations in the Economic System of the United States[J]. Review of Economic Statistics, 1936,18(3):106-125
[21] 李斌. 基于投入产出表对技术进步的测算方法研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2003,20(2):86-89
[22] 王芳,许健. 考虑结构变动的技术进步贡献率测算[J]. 科学管理研究, 2005,23(4):45-48
[23] 李景华. 基于投入产出模型的技术进步测算方法研究[J]. 生产力研究, 2007,(13):53-54
[24] 袁开智,赵芝俊,张社梅. 农业技术进步贡献率测算方法:回顾与评析[J]. 技术经济, 2008,27(2):67-70
[25] Hummels D., Ishii J., Yi K. M. The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2001,54(1):75-96
[26] Los B., Timmer M. P., Vries G. J. How Global are Global Value Chain? A New Approach to Measure International Fragmentation[R]. Journal of Regional Science, 2015,55(1):66-92
[27] 高敬峰,王庭东. 中国参与全球价值链的区域特征分析——基于垂直专业化分工的视角[J]. 世界经济研究, 2017, (4):83-94
[28] 高运胜,甄程成,郑乐凯. 中国制成品出口欧盟增加值分解研究——基于垂直专业化分工的视角[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2015,32(9):73-88
[29] 北京大学中国经济研究中心课题组. 中国出口中的垂直专门化与中美贸易[J]. 世界经济, 2006,(5):3-11
[30] 王玉燕. 全球价值链嵌入的技术进步效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2014,(9):65-77
[31] 钱纳里,鲁宾逊,赛尔奎因. 工业化和经济增长的比较研究[M]. 上海:上海三联书店出版, 1995
[32] 昊振宇,沈利生. 中国对外贸易对GDP贡献的经验分析[J]. 世界经济, 2004,(2):13-20
[33] 平新乔. 产业内贸易理论与中美贸易关系[J]. 国际经济评论, 2005,(5):12-14