How does Team Territorial Behavior Reduce Team Innovation Efficiency: The Mediating Role of Team Knowledge Hiding and the Moderating Role of Ethical Leadership

Abstract

Abstract: Based on the conservation of resource theory, this study investigates the influence of team territorial behavior on team innovation efficiency. Especially, the mechanism (i.e., the mediating role of team knowledge hiding) and the boundary condition (i.e., the moderating role of ethical leadership) underlying the relationship are tested. With a two-wave survey, we collect 590 samples from 169 small IT enterprises. Empirical analysis is carried out by using statistical software such as DEAP and SPSS, the results show that: (1) team territorial behavior has a significant positive impact on team innovation efficiency; (2) team knowledge hiding plays a partial mediating role in the relationship between team territorial behavior and team innovation efficiency; (3) ethical leadership plays a moderating role in the relationship between team territorial behavior and team knowledge hiding. To be specific, the positive effect of team territorial behavior on team knowledge hiding is stronger when the level of ethical leadership is lower; (4) ethical leadership further moderates the indirect effect of team territorial behavior on team innovation efficiency via team knowledge hiding. To be specific, the positive effect of team territorial behavior on team innovation efficiency through team knowledge hiding is enhanced when the level of ethical leadership is lower.

Key words: team territorial behavior, ethical leadership, team knowledge hiding, team innovation efficiency

Cheng Bao, Xia Tiantian, Luo Wenhao. How does Team Territorial Behavior Reduce Team Innovation Efficiency: The Mediating Role of Team Knowledge Hiding and the Moderating Role of Ethical Leadership[J]. Management Review, 2023, 35(3): 61-70.

References

[1] Yuan F., Woodman R. W. Innovative Behavior in the Workplace:The Role of Performance and Image Outcome Expections[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010,53(2):323-342
[2] Rego A., Cunha M. P. E., Simpson A. V. The Perceived Impact of Leaders' Humility on Team Effectiveness:An Empirical Study[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2018,148(1):205-218
[3] 魏江茹.中庸思维程度、知识共享与员工创新行为[J].经济管理, 2019,41(5):88-104
[4] 段锦云,肖君宜,夏晓彤.变革型领导、团队建言氛围和团队绩效:创新氛围的调节作用[J].科研管理, 2017,38(4):76-83
[5] 仲理峰,孟杰,高蕾.道德领导对员工创新绩效的影响:社会交换的中介作用和权力距离取向的调节作用[J].管理世界, 2019,35(5):149-160
[6] 王士红,徐彪,彭纪生.组织氛围感知对员工创新行为的影响--基于知识共享意愿的中介效应[J].科研管理, 2013,34(5):130-135
[7] 沈伊默,马晨露,白新文,等.辱虐管理与员工创造力:心理契约破坏和中庸思维的不同作用[J].心理学报, 2019,51(2):238-247
[8] 唐源,邵云飞,陈一君.跨界行为、知识整合能力对企业创新绩效的影响研究:基于知识获取和资源损耗的作用[J].预测, 2020,39(4):31-37
[9] 于海波,程龙,张璐,等.员工组织领地行为如何影响团队成员交换?--基于心理所有权的中介作用研究[J].山东财经大学学报, 2019,31(4):99-110
[10] Brown G., Lawrence T. B., Robinson S. L. Territoriality in Organizations[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2005,30(3):577-594
[11] 刘超,刘军,朱丽.团队领地行为与知识分享行为:基于认同理论的视角[J].中国人力资源开发, 2016,(21):61-70
[12] Brown G., Crossley C., Robinson S. L. Psychological Ownership, Territorial Behavior, and Being Perceived as a Team Contributor:The Critical Role of Trust in the Work Environment[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2014,67(2):463-485
[13] 彭贺.领地行为研究综述:组织行为学的新兴领域[J].经济管理, 2012,34(1):182-189
[14] 郭梦瑶,张丽华,朱嫣婷.领地性对员工创新行为的影响机制--以知识隐藏和不信任为连续中介[J].经济管理, 2020,42(5):88-102
[15] Wang L. K. S., Law M. J., Zhang Y. N., et al. It's Mine!Psychological Ownership of One's Job Explains Positive and Negative Workplace Outcomes of Job Engagement[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2019,104(2):229-246
[16] Edney J. J. Human Territoriality[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1974,81(12):959-975
[17] 娜仁,刘洪.画地为牢:领地行为是否抑制创造力?[J].财经论丛, 2018,(2):86-94
[18] 张佳良,王琦琦,刘军.员工领地侵占行为的概念界定与前因探索--基于对某零售企业员工行为的扎根研究[J].外国经济与管理, 2020,42(4):107-122
[19] Connelly C. E.,
Zweig D., Webster J., et al. Knowledge Hiding in Organizations[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2012,33(1):64-88
[20] Brown G. Claiming a Corner at Work:Measuring Employee Territoriality in Their Workspaces[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2009,29(1):44-52
[21] 周健明,周永务.知识惯性与知识创造行为:组织记忆与创新氛围的作用[J].科学学研究, 2021,39(6):1103-1110
[22] 魏巍,彭纪生,华斌.资源保存视角下高绩效人力资源系统对员工突破式创造力的双刃剑效应[J].管理评论, 2020,32(8):215-227
[23] 赵富强,鲁倩,陈耘.多元包容性人力资源实践对个体创造力的影响--双元学习和魅力型领导的作用[J].科研管理, 2020,41(4):94-102
[24] 刘军,陈星汶,肖宁,等.当协作要求遇上"山头主义":领地行为与任务相依性对团队绩效的影响研究[J].华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2016,(5):99-110
[25] Halbesleben J. R., Bowler W. M. Emotional Exhaustion and Job Performance:The Mediating Role of Motivation[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007,92(1):93-106
[26] Halbesleben J. R., Wheeler A. R. I Owe You One:Coworker Reciprocity as a Moderator of the Day-Level Exhaustion-Performance Relationship[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2011,32(4):608-626
[27] 万莉,江婷,邢恵淳.辱虐管理对员工知识隐藏的影响[J].上海管理科学, 2019,41(2):67-74
[28] 高天茹,贺爱忠.职场排斥对知识隐藏的影响机理研究:一个被调节的链式中介模型[J].南开管理评论, 2019,22(3):15-27
[29] 杜恒波,朱千林.职场负面八卦对员工知识隐藏的影响机制研究[J].科研管理, 2020,41(3):264-272
[30] 赵红丹,夏青.人际不信任、消极情感与知识隐藏行为研究[J].科研管理, 2019,40(8):284-292
[31] 王鹏,朱方伟,宋昊阳,等.人际信任与知识隐藏行为:个人声誉关注与不确定性感知的联合调节[J].管理评论, 2019,31(1):155-170
[32] Connelly C. E., Zweig D. How Perpetrators and Targets Construe Knowledge Hiding in Organizations[J]. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2015,24(3):479-489
[33] 吴士健,孙专专,权英.中庸思维对知识隐藏与员工创造力的影响机制研究[J].管理学报, 2020,17(4):527-535
[34] 于贵芳,温珂,方新.信任水平、合作关系与创新行为:社会交换理论视角下公立科研机构创新行为的影响因素研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2020,41(2):78-93
[35] 王志成,赵曙明,杨杰.多层次知识隐藏行为的形成与后果:基于地位竞争的视角[J].心理科学进展, 2020,28(6):893-903
[36] erne M., Nerstad C. G. L., Dysvik A., et al. What Goes
around Comes around:Knowledge Hiding, Perceived Motivational Climate, and Creativity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2014,57(1):172-192
[37] 黄爱华,黎子森.工作不安全感与员工创造力:知识隐藏的中介作用和任务互赖的调节作用[J].中国人力资源开发, 2016,(9):56-65
[38] Dust S. B., Resick C. J., Margolis J. A., et al. Ethical Leadership and Employee Success:Examining the Roles of Psychological Empowerment and Emotional Exhaustion[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2018,29(5):570-583
[39] 赵书松,王韵茹,刘智强.绩效工资强度和道德基础差异性对道德型领导下行效应的阻抑机制[J].管理学报, 2020,17(8):1159-1168
[40] Kalshoven K., Boon C. T. Ethical Leadership, Employee Well-Being, and Helping[J]. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 2012,11(1):60-68
[41] Brown M. E., Mitchell M. S. Ethical and Unethical Leadership:Exploring New Avenues for Future Research[J]. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2010,20(4):583-616
[42] 毛凯贤,李超平.互动视角下道德领导与主动性人格影响新员工敬业度的作用机制[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2018,39(12):156-170
[43] 王震,许灏颖,杜晨朵.道德型领导如何减少下属非道德行为:领导组织化身和下属道德效能的作用[J].心理科学, 2015,38(2):439-445
[44] Avey J. B., Avolio B. J, Crossley C. D., et al. Psychological Ownership:Theoretical Extensions, Measurement and Relation to Work Outcomes[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2009,30(2):173-191
[45] 王延霖,郭晓川.资源型上市公司高管团队激励方式对企业创新效率的影响研究--基于创新价值链和产权性质的考量[J].研究与发展管理, 2020,32(4):149-161
[46] 牛振邦,白长虹,张辉,等.浅层互动能否激发顾客价值共创意愿--基于品牌体验和价值主张契合的混合效应模型[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2015,36(11):112-123
[47] 吴卫红,赵鲲,张爱美.企业协同创新风险对创新绩效的作用路径研究[J].科研管理, 2021,42(5):124-132
[48] Kirmeyer S. L., Shirom A. Perceived Job Autonomy in the Manufacturing Sector:Effects of Unions, Gender, and Substantive Complexity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1986,29(4):832-840
[49] 刘德鹏,贾良定,尤树洋,等.下属更加偏爱与自己相似的上级吗?中国情境下同乡与同龄的差异化作用[J].中国人力资源开发, 2020,37(2):34-52
[50] 闫佳祺,罗瑾琏.科研团队双元领导与创新绩效[J].科学学研究, 2018,36(11):2103-2112
[51] 杜娟,赵曙明,林新月.悖论型领导风格情境下团队断层与团队创造力的作用机制研究[J].管理学报, 2020,17(7):988-997
[52] Chen G., Bliese P. D. The Role of Different Levels of Leadership in Predicting Self and Collective Efficacy:Evidence for Discontinuity[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002,87(3):549-556
[53] 郭功星,程豹.顾客授权行为对员工职业成长的影响:自我决定理论视角[J].心理学报, 2021,53(2):215-228
[54] Aiken L. S., West S. G.,
Reno R. R. Multiple Regression:Testing and Interpreting Interactions[M]. Newbury Park:Sage Publications, 1991
[55] Peng H. Why and When do People Hide Knowledge?[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2013,17(3):398-415
[56] 周星,程豹,郭功星.职场排斥对顾客服务主动性行为的影响--一个有调节的中介模型[J].经济管理, 2018,40(6):38-52