›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 186-197.

• 组织与战略管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

制度环境对房地产企业跨区域投资地域选择的影响

杨艳1, 李盼盼1, 毛育晖2   

  1. 1. 湖南大学工商管理学院, 长沙 410082;
    2. 天健会计师事务所(特殊普通合伙), 长沙 410015
  • 收稿日期:2016-08-10 出版日期:2018-11-28 发布日期:2018-11-22
  • 作者简介:杨艳,湖南大学工商管理学院副教授,博士生导师,博士;李盼盼,湖南大学工商管理学院硕士研究生;毛育晖,天健会计师事务所(特殊普通合伙)高级合伙人,博士。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金面上项目(71572055);国家自然科学基金创新研究群体项目(71521061);国家自然科学基金重大项目(71790593)。

Effects of Institutional Environment on Location Choice of Real Estate Companies' Inter regional Investment

Yang Yan1, Li Panpan1, Mao Yuhui2   

  1. 1. School of Business Administration, Hunan University, Changsha 410082;
    2. Tianjian Accounting Firm(Special General Partnership), Changsha 410015
  • Received:2016-08-10 Online:2018-11-28 Published:2018-11-22

摘要:

本文以2004-2015年中国房地产行业A股上市公司首次进入各省份的数据为样本,研究了地区制度环境对企业跨区域投资地域选择的影响。研究结果表明,区域制度环境越好,企业进入的概率越高;目标地与企业注册地之间制度距离越大,企业进入的概率越低;企业更愿意从制度环境差的注册地进入制度环境好的目标地而不愿从制度环境好的注册地进入制度环境差的目标地;并且从强制度区域进入弱制度区域时,制度距离对进入决策具有显著的抑制作用,但从弱制度区域进入强制度区域时,制度距离的影响却不显著。进一步研究发现,企业的政府关联和相关投资经验能够显著减弱制度环境、制度距离对投资地域选择的影响,降低制度环境带给企业的压力,促进企业的投资。

关键词: 制度环境, 制度距离, 房地产, 跨区域投资, 地域选择

Abstract:

By analyzing the performance of China's A-share listed real estate companies after their first entry into different provinces in China during the period from 2004 to 2015, this paper studies the effects of institutional environment on the location choices of companies. The empirical results indicate that the better the institutional environment of a target location is, the more likely the location is chosen. The bigger the institutional distance between target area and companies' register area is, the less likely the area is chosen. What's more, companies are willing to enter areas with institutional environment stronger than their register area and reluctant to enter the areas with institutional environment weaker than their register area. Furthermore, as to companies registered in areas of strong institution that entered areas of weaker institution, the restraining effect of institutional distance on the location choice is significant. But for companies registered in areas of weaker institution that entered areas of stronger institution, the effect of institutional distance on the location choice is not significant. By further analysis, we find that political connection and relevant investment experience moderate the relationship of institutional environment, institutional distance and location choice. These two factors can both reduce the inhibiting effect of the institutional environment on the entry choice and stimulate investment.

Key words: institutional environment, institutional distance, real estate, inter-regional investment, location choice