工作满意或不满意促进建言？——代际差异与PIED的调节效应

›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 176-185.

• 组织行为与人力资源管理 • 上一篇下一篇

工作满意或不满意促进建言？——代际差异与PIED的调节效应

阎亮¹, 马贵梅²

1. 陕西师范大学国际商学院, 西安 710029;
2. 西安工程大学管理学院, 西安 710048

收稿日期:2016-12-20 出版日期:2018-11-28 发布日期:2018-11-22
作者简介:阎亮,陕西师范大学国际商学院讲师,博士;马贵梅,西安工程大学管理学院讲师,博士。
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目（15YJC630153；16YJC630084）；中国博士后科学基金面上项目（2015M570811）；陕西省博士后科研项目（2016BSHEDZZ57）。

Job Satisfaction or Dissatisfaction Promote Voice?——Intergenerational Differences and Moderating Effect of PIED

Yan Liang¹, Ma Guimei²

1. International Business School, Shanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710029;
2. School of Management, Xi'an Polytechnic University, Xi'an 710048

Received:2016-12-20 Online:2018-11-28 Published:2018-11-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于以往工作满意度与建言关系相互矛盾的观点，本研究更为细致地讨论工作满意度与促进性建言与抑制性建言之间的关系，并讨论关系在代际间的差异以及感知的组织对员工发展投入（PIED）所起到的调节作用。以432名组织员工为样本，实证研究结果显示工作满意度与促进性建言在新生代员工与非新生代员工中均呈线性关系；工作满意度与抑制性建言在新生代员工中呈U型关系，在非新生代员工中呈线性关系；PIED在新生代员工中正向调节工作满意度与促进性建言的线性关系，负向调节工作满意度与抑制性建言的U型关系。文章对研究结果进行了讨论并展望了未来研究。

关键词: 工作满意度, 促进性建言, 抑制性建言, 代际差异, 感知的组织对员工发展投入

Abstract:

Based on the existing contradictory research conclusions about the relationship between job satisfaction and voice, this study discusses the relationship between job satisfaction, promotive and prohibitive voice, and discusses the generational difference of the relationships and moderating effect of perceived investment in employee development (PIED). Based on the sample of 432 employees, the empirical results show that the relationship between job satisfaction and promotive voice is linear without generational difference; moreover, the relationship between job satisfaction and prohibitive voice is U-shaped in new generation group, and is linear in compared group; PIED positively moderates the positive relationship between job satisfaction and promotive voice and negatively moderates the U-shaped relationship between job satisfaction and prohibitive voice in new generation employees. The results of the study are discussed and potential direction for further research is proposed.

Key words: job satisfaction, promotive voice, prohibitive voice, generational difference, perceived investment in employee development(PIED)

阎亮, 马贵梅. 工作满意或不满意促进建言？——代际差异与PIED的调节效应[J]. , 2018, 30(11): 176-185.

Yan Liang, Ma Guimei. Job Satisfaction or Dissatisfaction Promote Voice?——Intergenerational Differences and Moderating Effect of PIED[J]. , 2018, 30(11): 176-185.

参考文献

[1] 段锦云. 中国背景下建言行为研究:结构、形成机制及影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011,19(2):185-192
[2] 刘生敏,廖建桥. 真实型领导真能点亮员工的希望之言吗[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(4):111-121
[3] 詹小慧,杨东涛,栾贞增. 基于组织支持感调节效应的工作价值观对员工建言影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2016,13(9):1330-1338
[4] Morrison E. W., Milliken F. J. Organizational Silence:A Barrier to Change and Development in A Pluralistic World[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2000,25(4):706-725
[5] 向常春,龙立荣. 参与型领导与员工建言:积极印象管理动机的中介作用[J]. 管理评论, 2013,25(7):156-166
[6] 段锦云,张倩. 建言行为的认知影响因素、理论基础及发生机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012,20(1):115-126
[7] Tangirala S., Ramanujam R. Exploring Nonlinearity In Employee Voice:The Effects of Personal Control and Organizational Identification[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2008,51(6):1189-1203
[8] Farrell D. Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect as Responses to Job Dissatisfaction:A Multidimensional Scaling Study[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1983,26(4):596-607
[9] Liu W., Zhu R., Yang Y. I Warn You because I Like You:Voice Behavior, Employee Identifications, and Transformational Leadership[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2010,21(1):189-202
[10] 段锦云,钟建安. 工作满意感与建言行为的关系探索:组织承诺的缓冲影响[J]. 管理工程学报, 2012,26(1):170-174
[11] Liang J., Farh C. I. C., Farh J. L. Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice:A Two-Wave Examination[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2012,55(1):71-92
[12] 阎亮. 基于社会交换理论的新生代员工工作承诺影响机制研究[J]. 软科学, 2016,30(7):90-93
[13] 李燕萍,徐嘉. 新生代员工:心理和行为特征对组织社会化的影响[J]. 经济管理, 2013,35(4):61-70
[14] 周石. 80后员工"职业观"分析[J]. 管理世界, 2009,(4):184-185
[15] 马贵梅,樊耘,于维娜,等. 员工-组织价值观匹配影响建言行为的机制[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(4):85-98
[16] 陈岩,唐贵瑶. 向上逢迎行为对员工工作满意度的影响及其作用机制研究[J]. 预测, 2015,34(6):21-27
[17] 崔勋,张义明,瞿皎姣. 劳动关系氛围和员工工作满意度:组织承诺的调节作用[J]. 南开管理评论, 2012,15(2):19-30
[18] 逄键涛,温珂. 主动性人格、工作满意度与员工创新行为——对中国医药生物技术企业的实证分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2016,34(1):151-160
[19] Withey M. J., Cooper W. H. Predicting Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1989,34(4):521-539
[20] Gouldner A. W. The Norm of Reciprocity:A Preliminary Statement[J]. American Sociological Review, 1960,25(2):161-178
[21] Farrell D., Rusbult C. E. Exploring the Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect Typology:The Influence of Job Satisfaction, Quality of Alternatives, and Investment Size[J]. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 1992,5(3):201-218
[22] Smola K. W., Sutton C. D. Generational Differences:Revisiting Generational Work Values for the New Millennium[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2002,23(4):363-382
[23] Ayudhya U. C. N. The Generation Hame:Concepts of Baby-Boomer, Gen X and Gen Y can Create More Heat than Light[J]. Human Resource Management, 2015,23(5):29-32
[24] 尤佳,孙遇春,雷辉. 中国新生代员工工作价值观代际差异实证研究[J]. 软科学, 2013,27(6):83-88
[25] 周晓虹. 改革开放以来中国社会心态的变迁-有关中国经验的另一种解读[J]. 中国社会科学辑刊, 2009,(6):1-15
[26] 王洪青,彭纪生. 辱虐管理对员工心态的影响:代际差异的调节效应研究[J]. 商业经济与管理, 2015,35(1):19-26
[27] 魏昕,张志学. 组织中为什么缺乏抑制性进言?[J]. 管理世界, 2010,(10):99-109
[28] van Vianen A. E. M., Shen C., Chuang A. Person-organization and Person-supervisor Fits:Employee Commitments in a Chinese Context[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2010,32(6):906-926
[29] 段锦云. 家长式领导对员工建言行为的影响:心理安全感的中介机制[J]. 管理评论, 2012,24(10):109-116
[30] Kuvaas B., Dysvik A. Perceived Investment in Permanent Employee Development and Social and Economic Exchange Perceptions Among Temporary Employees[J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2009,39(10):2499-2524
[31] Chay H. L., Bruvold N. T. Creating Value for Employees:Investment in Employee Development[J]. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2003,14(6):981-1000
[32] Aryee S., Fields D., Luk V. A Cross-Cultural Test of a Model of the Work-Family Interface[J]. Journal of Management, 1999,25(4):491-511
[33] Kuvaas B., Dysvik A. Perceived Investment in Employee Development, Intrinsic Motivation and Work Performance[J]. Human Resource Management Journal, 2009,19(3):217-236
[34] 吴明隆. 结构方程模式SIMPLIS的应用[M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2012
[35] Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J., et al. Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research:A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003,88(5):879-903
[36] Hair J. F., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L. Multivariate Data Analysis (Sixth Edition)[M]. Upper Saddle River NJ:Prentice Hall, 2006
[37] Zhou J., George J. M. When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity:Encouraging the Expression of Voice[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001,44(4):682-696

工作满意或不满意促进建言？——代际差异与PIED的调节效应

Job Satisfaction or Dissatisfaction Promote Voice?——Intergenerational Differences and Moderating Effect of PIED

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	朱惠, 翁清雄. 人格、职业环境与工作满意度:基于匹配视角的实证研究[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(3): 207-219.
[2]	李涓, 李林涛. 面向劳动时间偏好差异的满意度分析与雇佣方案设计研究[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(10): 191-200.
[3]	张莹, 张剑, 张大龙. 员工目标内容对突破性创造力和渐进性创造力的影响:基于代际比较视角[J]. , 2020, 32(1): 166-175.
[4]	李杨, 符国群. 基于IAT的中国80后和90后原产国刻板印象研究[J]. , 2018, 30(8): 138-152.
[5]	罗瑾琏, 杨一佳, 孙彩霞. 企业女性高层次人才职业成长的个体—组织匹配规律研究[J]. , 2018, 30(12): 187-199.
[6]	张亚军, 张金隆, 张军伟, 崔利刚. 谦卑型领导与员工抑制性建言的关系研究[J]. , 2017, 29(5): 110-119.
[7]	张若勇, 张柳柳, 王海珍. 差错规避对部门绩效的影响：一个跨层链式中介模型[J]. , 2017, 29(4): 143-153.
[8]	占小军. 情绪还是认知?主管不文明行为对员工工作及生活的作用机制研究[J]. , 2017, 29(1): 82-92.
[9]	刘生敏1 廖建桥2. 真实型领导真能点亮员工的希望之言吗[J]. , 2015, 27(4): 111-.