管理评论 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 91-104.

• 创新与创业管理 • 上一篇    

政策强度、政策协同和区域创新绩效:基于粤港澳大湾区科技人才政策的实证研究

龙云凤1,2, 任志宽3, 孟鸿2, 吴婕洵1   

  1. 1. 广东省科技创新监测研究中心, 广州 510040;
    2. 北京大学材料科学与工程学院, 北京 100871;
    3. 广东省科学技术情报研究所, 广州 510033
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-11 发布日期:2026-06-06
  • 作者简介:龙云凤,广东省科技创新监测研究中心研究员,北京大学材料科学与工程学院,博士;任志宽(通讯作者),广东省科学技术情报研究所副研究员,博士;孟鸿,北京大学材料科学与工程学院教授,博士生导师;吴婕洵,广东省科技创新监测研究中心,硕士。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(72173034);广东省自然基金面上项目(2021A1515011961);广东省哲学社会科学规划2023年度人才研究专项特别委托项目(GD23RCZ09)。

Policy Intensity,Policy Synergy,and Innovation Performance: An Empirical Study Based on the Science and Technology Talent Policy in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area

Long Yunfeng1,2, Ren Zhikuan3, Meng Hong2, Wu Jiexun1   

  1. 1. Guangdong Science and Technology Innovation Monitoring and Research Center, Guangzhou 510040;
    2. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871;
    3. Information Institute of Science and Technology in Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510033
  • Received:2024-03-11 Published:2026-06-06

摘要: 本文以粤港澳大湾区2001-2020年的科技人才政策为研究对象,通过描述性统计与政策文本量化分析,制定科技人才政策量化标准,计算科技人才政策协同度,揭示政策部门、目标、工具协同特征及演变规律,并构建柯布-道格拉斯生产函数模型,应用岭回归分析探究政策目标协同与政策工具协同对于区域创新绩效的影响。研究结果表明:第一,随着人才强国战略推进,粤港澳大湾区科技人才政策发布数量整体增长,但存在地区差异;第二,政策目标结构不均衡,重人才质量与人才效益,轻人才流动与人才规模,政策工具使用不均衡,环境型政策工具运用相对不足;第三,政策发布部门合作增强,政策目标与政策工具协同性均呈现上升趋势;第四,不同政策目标与工具协同对于区域创新绩效的影响具有显著方向性差异,并非所有协同都有助于提升区域创新绩效。研究结论对于推动粤港澳大湾区科技人才资源的有效配置,为政府制定人才精准政策具有重要的参考价值。

关键词: 政策协同, 区域创新绩效, 科技人才政策, 粤港澳大湾区

Abstract: Taking the science and technology talent policies of 9+2 cities in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Great Bay Area from 2001 to 2020 as research object, this paper describes the characteristics and evolution patterns of the synergy among policy departments, objectives and tools through descriptive statistics and quantitative analysis of policy texts, and then constructs a production function model and applies ridge regression analysis to study the mechanism of how the synergy between policy objective and policy tool influences regional innovation performance. Based on the research, some findings are as follows. Firstly, with the promotion of the strategy on developing a quality workforce, the number of science and technology talent policies issued in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Great Bay Area has increased overall, but there are regional differences. Secondly, policy objectives are not structurally balanced, as reflected in great importance attached to talent quality and efficiency but little attention paid to the flow and scale of talents; the use of policy tools is also unbalanced, with environmental policy tools used insufficiently. Thirdly, the cooperation among policy publishing departments strengthens, resulting in enhanced synergy of policy objectives and a trend towards comprehensive utilization of various policy tools. Fourthly, the impact of different policy objectives and tools on regional innovation performance has significant directional differences, and not all synergies are conducive to improving regional innovation performance. The research conclusions are meaningful for promoting the effective allocation of scientific and technological talent resources in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, for the government to formulate precise talent policies, and for promoting regional coordinated development and international competitiveness.

Key words: policy synergy, regional innovation performance, science and technology talent policy, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area