管理评论 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 90-103.

• 创新与创业管理 • 上一篇    

制度复杂性与企业绿色创新驱动路径:基于汽车制造业的动态QCA研究

梁肖梅1, 汪秀琼2, 吴小节3   

  1. 1. 华南理工大学工商管理学院, 广州 510641;
    2. 华南理工大学旅游管理系, 广州 510006;
    3. 广东工业大学管理学院, 广州 510520
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-02 发布日期:2026-02-10
  • 作者简介:梁肖梅,华南理工大学工商管理学院博士研究生;汪秀琼,华南理工大学旅游管理系教授,博士生导师,博士;吴小节(通讯作者),广东工业大学管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(72272038); 广东省自然科学基金面上项目(2023A1515010699;2023A1515030083)

Institutional Complexity and Driving Paths for Enterprises' Green Innovation: A Dynamic QCA Study Based on the Automotive Manufacturing Industry

Liang Xiaomei1, Wang Xiuqiong2, Wu Xiaojie3   

  1. 1. School of Business Administration, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641;
    2. Department of Tourism Management, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006;
    3. School of Management, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520
  • Received:2023-06-02 Published:2026-02-10

摘要: 为讨论多重利益主体的制度复杂性对绿色创新的驱动路径,本文基于利益相关者理论与动态耦合视角,以中国汽车制造企业为例,应用动态QCA方法挖掘多重路径的组态和动态轨迹。研究结果表明:不存在单独驱动绿色创新的必要条件。利用面板QCA分析发现,利益相关者制度复杂性与绿色创新因果关系的时间效应强于案例效应。多时段QCA分析结果显示,“十二五”规划时期的组态有3类:市场主导的绩劣非国企驱动、业绩反馈不一致的国企驱动、“政府-市场双主导”下业绩反馈不一致的非国企驱动;“十三五”规划时期的组态则有4类:政府主导下的绩优国企驱动型、市场主导下的绩优国企驱动型、绩优国企的“重法规-弱社区”驱动型、多重利益相关者共促的绩劣企业驱动型。最后,本文总结出企业对多重利益相关者制度复杂性的响应与绿色创新的因果关系动态耦合特征。

关键词: 利益相关者理论, 制度复杂性, 绿色创新, 动态耦合, 动态QCA

Abstract: To discuss the paths of multi-stakeholder institutional complexity driving green innovation, we adopt the stakeholder theory and dynamic coupling perspective, take Chinese automobile manufacturing enterprises as an example, and apply dynamic QCA to explore the configurations and dynamic trajectories of multiple paths. Panel data QCA finds stronger time effects than case effects for the causal relationships between stakeholder institutional complexity and green innovation. The results of multi-temporal QCA show that there are three configurations in the 12th Five-Year Plan period: market-driven underperforming state-owned enterprises(SOEs), SOEs with inconsistent performance feedback, and non-SOEs with inconsistent performance feedback under the approach of “dual dominance by both the government and the market”. For the 13th Five-Year Plan period, the four configurations are: government-driven high-performing SOEs, market-driven high-performing SOEs, high-performing SOEs with “strong regulations and weak communities”, and poor-performing enterprises co-promoted by multiple stakeholders. Finally, we draw out the dynamic coupling characteristics of the causal relationship between firms' responses to multi-stakeholder institutional complexity and green innovation.

Key words: stakeholder theory, institutional complexity, green innovation, dynamic coupling, dynamic QCA