管理评论 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (12): 26-36.

• 数据要素管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

数据要素流通交易的可信指标及测度方法

刘业政1,2, 宗兰芳1, 周芦娟1, 潘岳1, 袁昆1,2   

  1. 1. 合肥工业大学管理学院, 合肥 230009;
    2. 网络空间行为与管理安徽省哲学社会科学重点实验室, 合肥 230009
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-30 出版日期:2024-12-28 发布日期:2025-01-02
  • 作者简介:刘业政,合肥工业大学管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士;宗兰芳,合肥工业大学管理学院博士研究生;周芦娟,合肥工业大学管理学院硕士研究生;潘岳,合肥工业大学管理学院硕士研究生;袁昆(通讯作者),合肥工业大学管理学院讲师,硕士生导师,博士。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金专项项目(72342011);合肥市社科联资助项目(SQKT202403)。

Trustworthy Indicators and Measurement Methods for the Circulation and Trading of Data Elements

Liu Yezheng1,2, Zong Lanfang1, Zhou Lujuan1, Pan Yue1, Yuan Kun1,2   

  1. 1. School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009;
    2. Key Laboratory of Philosophy and Social Sciences for Cyberspace Behaviour and Management, Hefei 230009
  • Received:2023-09-30 Online:2024-12-28 Published:2025-01-02

摘要: 数据要素流通交易环境复杂,参与主体类型多、交易过程环节多,潜在风险点既多又广,如何实现数据要素的可信流通交易成为制约数据要素安全高效流通交易的重要挑战之一。为此,本文首先基于数据要素流通交易领域11位专家的访谈数据和2018—2023年WOS核心数据库的119篇论文,通过LDA主题分析方法发现影响数据要素可信流通交易的关键因素,包括主体(participant)、数据(data)、合约(contract)和算法(algorithm)。其次,本文基于信任理论,通过文献检索确定了主体可信、数据可信、合约可信和算法可信的评估指标,并据此构建了PDCA可信框架。然后,采用AHP层次分析法对评价指标进行赋权,计算出数据要素可信流通交易的评估指标体系权重。最后,本文阐述了关键可信指标体系测度方法。本文研究成果对刻画和评估数据要素流通交易的可信水平,助力数据市场可信生态体系建设提供了重要理论依据。

关键词: 数据要素, PDCA, 可信指标, 可信流通交易

Abstract: The environment for the circulation and transaction of data elements is complex, involving various types of participants and numerous transaction process steps. There are numerous and diverse potential risk points, and achieving credible circulation and transaction of data elements has become an important challenge that restricts the safe and efficient circulation and transaction of data elements. To this end, based on the interview data from 11 experts in the field of data circulation and trading, as well as 119 papers from the Web of Science (WOS) core database from 2018 to 2023, this paper first identifies the key factors affecting the trustworthy circulation and trading of data elements through Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic model. These factors include participant, data, contract, and algorithm, which are based on to construct a PDCA trustworthy framework. Then, trust theory is used to determine the evaluation indicators for trustworthy participant, trustworthy data, trustworthy contract, and trustworthy algorithm through a literature review. Subsequently, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to assign weights to the evaluation indicators, calculating the weight of the evaluation index system for the trustworthy circulation and trading of data elements. Finally, the paper elaborates on the measurement of key indicators in the trustworthy indicator system. This research provides important theoretical and reference bases for characterizing and evaluating the credibility of data element circulation and trading, and for supporting the construction of a trustworthy ecological system in the data market.

Key words: data elements, PDCA, trustworthy indicator, credible circulation and transaction