房地产企业地位对跨区域投资行为的影响研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文将社会经济学中的企业地位引入到房地产市场中，用来衡量房地产企业间的个体差异，并研究企业地位对跨区域投资程度和跨区域投资模式的影响。研究发现，房地产企业地位显著影响跨区域投资行为。企业地位越高，其跨区域投资程度随之越强，且在跨区域投资时越倾向于联合投资模式。此外，经济政策不确定性的增大，会强化房地产企业地位与跨区域投资程度间的正向关系，同时弱化房地产企业地位与跨区域联合投资模式的正向关系以及房地产企业地位与跨区域独立投资模式的负向关系。房地产企业地位对跨区域投资行为的影响仅在民营房地产和投资市场制度环境好的情况下有效。将企业性质以及投资区域制度环境二者结合同时考虑的情况下发现，仅有民营房地产企业选择在制度环境好的区域开展跨区域投资时，企业地位高会正向影响跨区域投资程度，且其更倾向于选择联合跨区域投资模式。若企业性质为国有企业或者目标区域制度环境差时，企业地位对跨区域投资程度和跨区域投资模式的影响均不显著。

关键词: 企业地位, 房地产企业, 跨区域投资行为, 经济政策不确定性, 区域制度

Abstract: This paper introduces the ‘enterprise status’ concept of social economics into the real estate market to measure the individual differences among real estate enterprises, and studies the impact of enterprises' status on the extent and pattern of their cross-regional investment. The results show that the status of real estate enterprises significantly affects their cross-regional investment behavior. The higher status a real estate enterprise has, to a larger extent it would make cross-regional investments and the more inclined it is to join hands with others to make such investments. In addition, the increase of economic policy uncertainty will strengthen the positive relationship between the status of real estate enterprises and the degree of their cross-regional investment, while weakening the positive relationship between their status and their cross-regional co-investment, as well as the negative relationship between their status and their independent cross-regional investment. The effect of real estate enterprises' status on their cross-regional investment behavior is effective only under the following conditions:the real estate enterprises are private-owned and the investment market operates under a sound regulatory system. If both the nature of the real estate enterprises ownership and the regulatory system of investment destination are considered, it can be found that when only private real estate enterprises choose to carry out cross-regional investment in the region with a sound regulatory system, the high status of enterprises will positively affect the extent of cross-regional investment, and they are more inclined to choose a cross-regional co-investment model. If the real estate enterprises are state-owned or the regulatory system of investment destination is not sound enough, the influence of enterprises' status on the extent and pattern of their cross-regional investment is not significant.

Key words: enterprises' status, real estate enterprise, cross-regional investment behavior, economic policy uncertainty, regional system

刘广平, 孙尉. 房地产企业地位对跨区域投资行为的影响研究[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(11): 45-61.

Liu Guangping, Sun Wei. Effect of Real Estate Enterprises Status on Their Cross-regional Investment Behavior[J]. Management Review, 2023, 35(11): 45-61.

参考文献

[1] 芮明杰,詹文静,陈杰. 跨区域发展战略对房地产企业绩效的影响——基于房地产上市公司的实证研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2008,(8):56-64
[2] 严复雷,史依铭,黎思琦. 经济政策不确定性、市场化进程与企业投资选择[J]. 投资研究, 2020,39(2):25-42
[3] 武立东,江津,王凯. 董事会成员地位差异、环境不确定性与企业投资行为[J]. 管理科学, 2016,29(2):52-65
[4] Vroom R. J. Changes in Kidney Function after Aortography with Diodoge[J]. Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde, 1964,108(6):1288-1289
[5] Max W. Economy and Society:An Outline of Interpretive Sociology[M]. Berkeley:University of California Press, 1978
[6] Podolny J. M. A Status-Based Model of Market Competition[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1993,98(4):829-872
[7] Elsbach K. D., Kramer R. M. Members' Responses to Organizational Identity Threats:Encountering and Countering the Business Week Rankings[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996,41(3):442-476
[8] Washington M., Zajac E. J. Status Evolution and Competition:Theory and Evidence[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005,48(2):282-296
[9] Benjamin B. A., Podolny J. M. Status, Quality, and Social Order in the California Wine Industry[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999,44(3):563-589
[10] Podolny J. M., Stuart T. E. A Role-Based Ecology of Technological Change[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1995,100(5):1224-1260
[11] 王是业,杜国臣. 战略管理研究中的组织地位:内涵、演进和影响[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2015,37(5):65-74
[12] Jensen M., Roy A. Staging Exchange Partner Choices:When do Status and Reputation Matter?[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2008,51(3):495-516
[13] Merton R. C. A Simple Model of Capital Market Equilibrium with Incomplete Information[J]. Journal of Finance, 1987,42(3):483-510
[14] 陈钢,王栋. 社会地位会影响企业融资约束吗?——来自A股民营上市公司的经验证据[J]. 经济管理, 2020,42(2):160-174
[15] D'aveni R. A. A Multiple-Constituency, Status-Based Approach to Interorganizational Mobility of Faculty and Input-Output Competition among Top Business Schools[J]. Organization Science, 1996,7(2):166-189
[16] Shen R., Tang Y., Chen G. When the Role Fits:How Firm Status Differentials Affect Corporate Takeovers[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2014,35(13):2012-2030
[17] Chung S., Singh H., Lee K. Complementarity, Status Similarity and Social Capital as Drivers of Alliance Formation[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000,21(1):1-22
[18] Castellucci F., Ertug G. What's in It for Them? Advantages of Higher-Status Partners in Exchange Relationships[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010,53(1):149-166
[19] Li S. X., Berta W. B. The Ties that Bind:Strategic Actions and Status Structure in the US Investment Banking Industry[J]. Organization Studies, 2002,23(3):339-368
[20] Spence M. Job Market Signaling[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1973,87(3):355-374
[21] Podolny J. M. Status Signals[M]. Princeton:Princeton University Press, 2010
[22] Lin Z., Yang H., Arya B. Alliance Partners and Firm Performance:Resource Complementarity and Status Association[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2009,30(9):921-940
[23] 王宏伟,任荣伟,宋丽. 中国房地产企业的竞争优势与核心能力——对广州市房地产企业的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2007,(2):158-159
[24] Tan J. Impact of Ownership Type on Environment-Strategy Linkage and Performance:Evidence from a Transitional Economy[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2002,39(3):333-354
[25] Lin X. State versus Private MNCs from China:Initial Conceptualizations[J]. International Marketing Review, 2010,27(3):366-380
[26] 任颋,茹璟,尹潇霖. 所有制性质、制度环境与企业跨区域市场进入战略选择[J]. 南开管理评论, 2015,18(2):51-63
[27] 宋铁波,吴小节,汪秀琼. 制度差异、企业跨区域经营经验与市场进入模式[J]. 管理评论, 2016,28(4):166-177
[28] Meyer K. E., Nguyen H. V. Foreign Investment Strategies and Sub-National Institutions in Emerging Markets:Evidence from Vietnam[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2005,42(1):63-93
[29] Rodolphe D., Antoine K. P. Classical Deviation:Organizational and Individual Status as Antecedents of Conformity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2016,59(1):65-89
[30] Rogan M., Greve H. R. Resource Dependence Dynamics:Partner Reactions to Mergers[J]. Organization Science, 2015,26(1):239-255
[31] Pollock T. G., Lashley K., Rindova V. P., et al. Which of These Things Are Not Like the Others? Comparing the Rational, Emotional, and Moral Aspects of Reputation, Status, Celebrity, and Stigma[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2019,13(2):444-478
[32] Mcdonnell M. H., King B. G. Order in the Court:How Firm Status and Reputation Shape the Outcomes of Employment Discrimination Suits[J]. Amerian Sociological Review, 2018,83(1):61-87
[33] Stern I., Dukerich J. M., Zajac E. Unmixed Signals:How Reputation and Status Affect Alliance Formation[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2014,35(4):512-531
[34] 杨艳,李盼盼,毛育晖. 制度环境对房地产企业跨区域投资地域选择的影响[J]. 管理评论, 2018,30(11):186-197
[35] 陈淑云,王翔翔. 经济政策不确定性会抑制房地产企业投资行为吗?——基于2003-2018年沪深两市房地产企业的数据分析[J]. 江汉论坛, 2020,(6):59-68
[36] 樊纲,王小鲁,余静文. 中国分省份市场化指数报告(2016)[R]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2017
[37] 樊纲,王小鲁,朱恒鹏. 中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2011年度报告[M]. 北京:经济科学出版社, 2011
[38] 苏坤. 政治关联对公司股价崩盘风险的影响[J]. 管理评论, 2021,33(7):54-67
[39] 杨松令,牛登云,刘亭立,等. 行为金融视角下投资者情绪对实体企业金融化的影响研究[J]. 管理评论, 2021,33(6):3-15
[40] 廖冠民,贾婧,兰舒琳. 民间金融对民营企业投资行为的影响[J]. 管理评论, 2021,33(6):255-269
[41] Marr J. C., Thau S. Falling from Great (and Not-So-Great) Heights:How Initial Status Position Influences Performance after Status Loss[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2014,57(1):223-248
[42] 马迎贤. 资源依赖理论的发展和贡献评析[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2005,(1):116-119