不同差错氛围激发团队突破性创造力的机理研究：社会信息处理视角

管理评论 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 221-231,284.

• 组织行为与人力资源管理 • 上一篇下一篇

不同差错氛围激发团队突破性创造力的机理研究：社会信息处理视角

耿紫珍^1,2, 周怡欣², 单春霞², 丁琳²

1. 西安外国语大学人文社会科学研究中心, 西安 710128;
2. 西安外国语大学商学院, 西安 710128

收稿日期:2019-10-29 出版日期:2022-09-28 发布日期:2022-10-28
通讯作者: 耿紫珍(通讯作者),西安外国语大学人文社会科学研究中心副教授,陕西高校青年创新团队带头人,硕士生导师,博士
作者简介:周怡欣,西安外国语大学商学院硕士研究生;单春霞,西安外国语大学商学院副教授,硕士生导师,博士研究生;丁琳,西安外国语大学商学院副教授,硕士生导师,博士。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目（71972155）；教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目（20XJC630001）；陕西省创新人才推进计划——青年科技新星项目（2019KJXX-056）。

The Influencing Mechanism between Different Error Climates and Team Radical Creativity： A Social Information Processing Perspective

Geng Zizhen^1,2, Zhou Yixin², Shan Chunxia², Ding Lin²

1. Institute of Humanities and Social Science, Xi'an International Studies University, Xi'an 710128;
2. Business School, Xi'an International Studies University, Xi'an 710128

Received:2019-10-29 Online:2022-09-28 Published:2022-10-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了揭示不同差错氛围影响团队突破性创造力的内部机理，首先基于社会信息处理理论分析团队突破性创造力形成要素和路径，提出差错管理氛围和差错反感氛围通过影响团队心理、认知和社会互动三方面关键要素（简称三要素）作用于团队突破性创造力的理论框架，然后考察差错管理氛围和差错反感氛围对团队突破性创造力的直接效应，以及通过三要素，即团队心理安全感、团队认知柔性和团队建设性辩论作用于团队突破性创造力的平行中介效应，构建不同差错氛围影响团队突破性创造力的“心理-认知-社会”机理模型。采用层次回归、Bootstrap检验和瞬时中介检验等分析方法针对119个创新团队的配对问卷调研数据进行实证检验，研究结果表明：（1）团队心理安全感、团队认知柔性和团队建设性辩论均正向影响团队突破性创造力；（2）差错管理氛围正向影响而差错反感氛围负向影响团队突破性创造力；（3）差错管理氛围正向影响团队心理安全感、团队认知柔性和团队建设性辩论，而差错反感氛围倒U型影响团队建设性辩论和负向影响团队心理安全感；（4）团队心理安全感、团队认知柔性和团队建设性辩论中介了差错管理氛围对团队突破性创造力的影响，团队建设性辩论和团队心理安全感中介了差错反感氛围对团队突破性创造力的影响。研究通过聚焦于团队突破性想法产生源头阐明了不同差错氛围在突破性创新理论和实践发展中的重要作用。

关键词: 突破性创造力, 差错氛围, 社会信息处理, 多中介模型, 瞬时中介检验

Abstract: In order to reveal the mechanism of how different error climates influence team radical creativity, firstly, on the basis of social information processing theory, this paper analyzes the formation factors and paths of team radical creativity, and proposes the theoretical framework about the effects of error management climate and error aversion climate on team radical creativity through psychological, cognitive and, social elements. Then the influence of two error climates on team radical creativity and three key elements, namely team psychological safety, team cognitive flexibility and team constructive controversy, as well as the parallel mediating roles of the above elements in transmitting the above influence to team radical creativity are analyzed. A model of the “psychological-cognitive-social” mechanisms between different error climates and team radical creativity is constructed. Through the hierarchical regression, Bootstrap analysis and the analysis of instantaneous mediation effect on the basis of data of 119 innovative teams, this paper reaches the following conclusions: (1) The psychological, cognitive and social factors in team radical creation, i.e., team psychological safety, team cognitive flexibility and team constructive controversy have positive effects on team radical creativity; (2) Error management climate exerts a positive effect while error aversion climate has a negative influence on team radical creativity; (3) Error management climate has positive effects on team psychological safety, team cognitive flexibility and team constructive controversy while error aversion climate has a negative effect on team psychological safety and an inverted U-shaped effect on team constructive controversy; (4) Team psychological safety, team cognitive flexibility and team constructive controversy mediate the effect of error management climate on team radical creativity while team psychological safety and team constructive controversy mediate the effect of error aversion climate on team radical creativity. By focusing on the source of team’s radical idea generation, this study illustrates the key roles of different error climates in the development of radical innovation theory and practice.

Key words: radical creativity, error climate, social information processing, multiple-mediation model, instantaneous mediation analysis

耿紫珍, 周怡欣, 单春霞, 丁琳. 不同差错氛围激发团队突破性创造力的机理研究：社会信息处理视角[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(9): 221-231,284.

Geng Zizhen, Zhou Yixin, Shan Chunxia, Ding Lin. The Influencing Mechanism between Different Error Climates and Team Radical Creativity： A Social Information Processing Perspective[J]. Management Review, 2022, 34(9): 221-231,284.

参考文献

[1] 邓渝. 资源整合对突破性创新的影响研究——联盟伙伴竞争的调节作用[J]. 管理评论, 2019,31(11):71-79
[2] 刘卫柏,李中. 企业突破性技术创新投资决策的期权博弈模型[J]. 管理评论, 2016,28(4):89-97
[3] 王永健,谢卫红,王田绘,等. 强弱关系与突破式创新关系研究——吸收能力的中介作用和环境动态性的调节效应[J]. 管理评论, 2016,28(10):111-122
[4] Tang C., Ye L. Diversified Knowledge, R&D Team Centrality and Radical Creativity[J]. Creativity & Innovation Management, 2015,24(1):123-135
[5] Madjar N., Greenberg E., Chen Z. Factors for Radical Creativity, Incremental Creativity, and Routine, Noncreative Performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2011,96(4):730-743
[6] 邓传军,刘智强,王凤娟. 非正式地位、错误管理文化与员工创新行为选择[J]. 管理评论, 2017,29(4):156-164+197
[7] 尹奎,徐渊,宋皓杰,等. 科研经历、差错管理氛围与科研创造力提升[J]. 科研管理, 2018,39(9):169-176
[8] 赵斌,刘桂霞,宇卫昕,等. 差错管理氛围、工作复杂性对员工创新行为影响的跨层次研究[J]. 预测, 2017,36(5):15-23
[9] 杜鹏程,李敏,倪清,等. 差错反感文化对员工创新行为的影响机制研究[J]. 管理学报, 2015,12(4):538-545
[10] Van Dyck C., Frese M., Baer M., et al. Organizational Error Management Culture and Its Impact on Performance: A Two-Study Replication[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005,90(6):1228-1240
[11] Venkataramani V., Richter A. W., Clarke R. Creative Benefits from Well-Connected Leaders: Leader Social Network Ties As Facilitators of Employee Radical Creativity[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2014,99(5):966-975
[12] Salancik G. R., Pfeffer J. A Social Information Processing Approach to Job Attitudes and Task Design[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1978,23(2):224-253
[13] Edmondson A. Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999,44(2):350-383
[14] Martin M. M., Rubin R. B. A New Measure of Cognitive Flexibility[J]. Psychological Reports, 1995,76(2):623-626
[15] Tjosvold D., Wedley W. C., Field R. H. G. Constructive Controversy, the Vroom-Yetton Model, and Managerial Decision-Making[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1986,7(2):125-138
[16] Tu Y., Lu X., Choi J. N., et al. Ethical Leadership and Team-Level Creativity: Mediation of Psychological Safety Climate and Moderation of Supervisor Support for Creativity[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2019,159(2):551-565
[17] Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory[M]. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1986
[18] 胡辰光. 高管团队认知柔性条件下企业双元性创新的影响机制研究[D]. 浙江大学硕士学位论文, 2014
[19] Sun X., Jie Y., Wang Y., et al. Shared Leadership Improves Team Novelty: The Mechanism and Its Boundary Condition[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2016,19(7):1-12
[20] 张若勇,张柳柳,王海珍. 差错规避对部门绩效的影响:一个跨层链式中介模型[J]. 管理评论, 2017,29(4):145-155
[21] MacKinnon D. A. Contrasts in Multiple Mediator Models[A]. In Rose J. S., Chassin L., Presson C. C., et al.(Eds.) Multivariate Applications in Substance Use Research: New Methods for New Questions[C]. Mahwah, NJ: Erblaum, 2000
[22] Hayes A. F., Preacher K. J. Quantifying and Testing Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models When the Constituent Paths Are Nonlinear[J]. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2010,45(4):627-660
[23] Preacher K. J., Hayes A. F. Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirecct Effects in Multiple Mediator Models[J]. Behavior Research Methods, 2008,40(3):879-891

不同差错氛围激发团队突破性创造力的机理研究：社会信息处理视角

The Influencing Mechanism between Different Error Climates and Team Radical Creativity： A Social Information Processing Perspective

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	许玉平, 严荣笑, 刘智强, 程欢, 卫利华. 独特性需求对员工突破性和渐进性创造力的影响[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(6): 193-204.
[2]	张莹, 张剑, 张大龙. 员工目标内容对突破性创造力和渐进性创造力的影响:基于代际比较视角[J]. , 2020, 32(1): 166-175.