公众社区参与意愿对危化品危害利益相关者感知的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

面对危化品危害，政府及相关单位面临着日益严峻的既要保证公众知情，又要避免信息过度传播的难题，"信任"是导致这种沟通困境的重要因素。为解决危害信息有效沟通问题，从重构公众与政府之间信任关系的角度入手，以公众利益相关者感知衡量信任，探究公众社区参与意愿对利益相关者感知的影响关系，并将社区参与分为代表单向沟通的仪式性参与和代表双向沟通的实质性参与。研究结果表明：公众社区参与意愿有利于提升公众危化品危害利益相关者感知，特别是仪式性参与意愿的直接作用效果更为显著；实质性参与意愿和危害利益相关者感知的关系中，预决策过程起到完全中介的作用；危化品危害知识在社区参与意愿和利益相关者感知的影响关系中起到显著的正向调节作用，特别是在预决策过程与利益相关者感知的影响路径中。研究结论为构建公众和政府之间的信任关系，进而为缓解危化品危害信息沟通难题提供理论支撑和实践价值。

关键词: 社区参与, 利益相关者, 风险感知, 危险化学品, 风险沟通

Abstract:

In face of hazardous chemicals, the government and related departments often fall into a dilemma where they have to ensure the public's information right but meanwhile worry about the public's reaction. Trust is an important factor leading to the above commu-nication plight. In order to facilitate effective hazard information communication, this study starts from the viewpoint of reconstructing trust relationship between the public and government, measures public trust by stakeholder perception, then explores the influence rela-tionship between community involvement intention and stakeholder perception. Specially, community participation is divided into ritual participation and substantive participation, which represents one way communication and dual-way communication respectively. Results show that:stakeholder perception of hazardous chemicals could be significantly improved by public community involvement intention, es-pecially the direct effect of ritual participate intention; the pre-decisional processes plays a completely mediating role in the model; haz-ard knowledge has a significant moderating effect in the model, especially in the path from pre-decision process to stakeholder perception. This study will provide theoretical support and practical value for construction of the trust relationship between the public and government.

Key words: community involvement, stakeholder, risk perception, hazardous chemicals, risk communication

李萧薇, 刘铁忠, 张湖波, 董金阳. 公众社区参与意愿对危化品危害利益相关者感知的影响[J]. , 2020, 32(1): 298-308.

Li Xiaowei, Liu Tiezhong, Zhang Hubo, Dong Jinyang. The Influence of Community Involvement Intention to Stakeholder Perception for Threats of Hazardous Chemicals[J]. , 2020, 32(1): 298-308.

参考文献

[1] 张乐,童星."邻避"冲突中的社会学习——基于7个PX项目的案例比较[J].学术界, 2016,31(8):38-54
[2] 马奔,李继朋.我国邻避效应的解读:基于定性比较分析法的研究[J].上海行政学院学报, 2015,16(5):41-51
[3] Bearth A., Cousin M. E., Siegrist M. "The Dose Makes the Poison":Informing Consumers About the Scientific Risk Assessment of Food Additives[J]. Risk Analysis, 2016,36(1):130-143
[4] Iles I. A., Egnoto M. J., Fisher L. B., et al. Understanding the Adoption Process of National Security Technology:An Integration of Diffusion of Innovations and Volitional Behavior Theories[J]. Risk Analysis, 2017,37(11):2246-2259
[5] Frewer L., Salter B. Public Attitudes, Scientific Advice and the Politics of Regulatory Policy:The Case of BSE[J]. Science&Public Policy, 2002,29(2):64-72
[6] 高勇.参与行为与政府信任的关系模式研究[J].社会学研究, 2014,29(5):98-119
[7] Schweizer P. J., Bovet J. The Potential of Public Participation to Facilitate Infrastructure Decision-making:Lessons From the Ger-man and European Legal Planning System for Electricity Grid Expansion[J]. Utilities Policy, 2016,42(1):64-73
[8] Heath R. L., Lee J. Chemical Manufacturing and Refining Industry Legitimacy:Reflective Management, Trust, Precrisis Commu-nication to Achieve Community Efficacy[J]. Risk Analysis An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2015,36(6):1108-1124
[9] Field S. Urban Risks:Moving from Humanitarian Responses to Disaster Prevention[R]. Wilton Park Conference, 2011
[10] Change I. P. O. C. Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report[J]. Environmental Policy Collection, 2014,27(2):408-483
[11] 范春梅,贾建民,李华强.食品安全事件中的公众风险感知及应对行为研究——以问题奶粉事件为例[J].管理评论, 2012,24(1):163-168
[12] Covello V. T. Risk Perception and Communication[J]. Risk Analysis, 2009,86(8):1059-1060
[13] Slovic, P. Perception of Risk[J]. Science, 1987,236(4799):280-285
[14] Lindell M. K., Perry R. W. The Protective Action Decision Model:Theoretical Modifications and Additional Evidence[J]. Risk Analysis, 2012,32(4):616-632
[15] 谢晓非,李洁,于清源.怎样会让我们感觉更危险——风险沟通渠道分析[J].心理学报, 2008,40(4):456-465
[16] Committee on Risk Perception and Communication, National Research Council. Improving Risk Communication[M]. Washington:National Academy Press, 1989
[17] 高旭,张圣柱,杨国梁,等.风险沟通研究进展综述[J].中国安全生产科学技术, 2011,7(5):148-152
[18] 强月新,余建清.风险沟通:研究谱系与模型重构[J].武汉大学学报(人文科学版), 2008,61(4):501-505
[19] 全世文,曾寅初,黄波.北京市居民对核电的认知与接受意愿——基于日本核泄漏事故背景下的调查[J].北京社会科学, 2012,27(5):55-60
[20] Kusumi T., Hirayama R., Kashima Y. Risk Perception and Risk Talk:The Case of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Radiation Risk[J]. Risk Analysis An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2017,37(2):2305-2320
[21] Cummings C. L., Berube D. M., Lavelle M. E. Influences of Individual-level Characteristics on Risk Perceptions to Various Cate-gories of Environmental Health and Safety Risks[J]. Journal of Risk Research, 2013,16(10):1277-1295
[22] Roder G., Ruljigaljig T., Lin C. W., et al. Natural Hazards Knowledge and Risk Perception of Wujie Indigenous Community in Taiwan[J]. Natural Hazards, 2016,81(1):641-662
[23] 杨敏.公民参与、群众参与与社区参与[J].社会, 2005,243(5):78-95
[24] Freeman R. E. Strategic Management:A Stakeholder Approach[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1984
[25] French J., Raven B. The Bases of Social Power[M]. Ann Arbor:Institute for Social Research, 1959
[26] 李金保,冷俊峰.社会公众在环境保护中发挥作用的条件与对策研究[J].经济与管理评论, 2018,34(2):62-68
[27] Vyncke B., Perko T., Van G. B. Information Sources as Explanatory Variables for the Belgian Health-Related Risk Perception of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident.[J]. Risk Analysis, 2017,37(3):570-582
[28] Morss R. E., Demuth J. L., Bostrom A., et al. Flash Flood Risks and Warning Decisions:A Mental Models Study of Forecaste-rs, Public Officials, and Media Broadcasters in Boulder, Colorado[J]. Risk Analysis An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2015,35(11):2009-2028
[29] 余乐安,李玲,戴伟,等.危化品水污染事件中政府危机信息公布策略与网络舆情扩散研究:基于多主体模型[J].管理评论, 2016,28(8):175-185
[30] Lavdmaa D., Bolorchimeg B., Mamoru I. Effect of Local Community's Environmental Perception on Trust in a Mining Company:A Case Study in Mongolia[J]. Sustainability, 2018,10(3):614-625
[31] Chan E. Y. Y., Hung K. C. K., Yue J., et al. Preliminary Findings on Urban Disaster Risk Literacy and Preparedness in a Chi-nese Community[C]. World Congress on Public Health World Health Organization, 2012
[32] Ishikawa H., Kato M., Kiuchi T. Associations of Health Literacy and Information Sources with Health-risk Anxiety and Protective Behaviors[J]. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 2016,9(1):33-39
[33] Fraser M. P., Sung M. C., Johnson J. E. Toward an Understanding of the Influence of Cultural Background and Domain Experi-ence on the Effects of Risk-pricing Formats on Risk Perception[J]. Risk Analysis, 2014,34(10):1846-1869
[34] Heath R. L., O'Hair D. Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication[M]. New York:Routledge, 2010
[35] Zhu W. W., Wei J. C., Zhao D. T. Anti-nuclear Behavioral Intentions:The Role of Perceived Knowledge, Information Process-ing, and Risk Perception[J]. Energy Policy, 2016,88(1):168-177
[36] Yi M., Lin C. A. Communicating Food Safety Via the Social Media:The Role of Knowledge and Emotions on Risk Perception and Prevention[J]. Science Communication, 2014,36(5):593-616
[37] Clothier R. A., Greer D. A., Greer D. G., et al. Risk Perception and the Public Acceptance of Drones[J]. Risk Analysis, 2015,35(6):1167-1183
[38] Shi J., Visschers V. H., Siegrist M. Public Perception of Climate Change:The Importance of Knowledge and Cultural Worldviews[J]. Risk Analysis An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2015,35(12):2183-2201
[39] Dhar C. P., Haque C. E., Driedger S. M. Dengue Disease Risk Mental Models in the City of Dhaka, Bangladesh:Juxtapositions and Gaps Between the Public and Experts[J]. Risk Analysis, 2016,36(5):874-891
[40] 侯杰泰.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京:经济科学出版社, 2004
[41] 张虎,田茂峰.信度分析在调查问卷设计中的应用[J].统计与决策, 2007,23(21):25-27
[42] 温忠麟,侯杰泰,马什赫伯特.结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则[J].心理学报, 2004,36(2):186-194
[43] 温忠麟,刘红云,侯杰泰.调节效应和中介效应分析[M].北京:教育科学出版社, 2012
[44] Tappenden K. M. The District of North Vancouver's Landslide Management Strategy:Role of Public Involvement for Determining Tolerable Risk and Increasing Community Resilience[J]. Natural Hazards, 2014,72(2):481-501