制度合法性与吸收能力影响技术标准竞争力的机制研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文研究了影响技术标准竞争力的内外部因素与过程机制。以开放式创新为视角，运用技术标准竞争与新制度主义理论，讨论了吸收能力与制度合法性对技术标准竞争力的作用。以泊松回归与生存分析为实证方法，高新技术企业为研究样本，检验了理论假设。研究发现，内向型创新提升了技术标准竞争力，这种效应得到吸收能力的加强，但被合法性距离所减弱。同时，企业追求制度合法性的行为提高了技术标准竞争力。外部制度合法性更有利于标准数量衡量的整体竞争力，内部制度合法性更有利于形成首个技术标准。最后，讨论了对企业技术标准竞争力的理论与实践启示。

关键词: 技术标准, 开放式创新, 吸收能力, 合法性距离, 制度合法性

Abstract:

In this paper we study the internal and external factors that influence technology standard competence and the influencing process and mechanism. Incorporating theories of technology standard competition and new institutionalism, we explore, from an open innovation perspective, the role that absorptive capacities and institutional legitimacy play in technology standard competence. Employing high-tech firms as the research sample, we test the theoretical hypotheses with Poisson Regression and Survival Analysis. It is found that inbound innovation enhances the competitiveness of technology standard, which is strengthened by absorptive capacity and weakened by institutional distance. Meanwhile, enterprises' pursuit of institutional legitimacy improves the competitiveness of technology standard. External institutional legitimacy is more likely to promote the overall competitiveness measured by the number of technology standards while internal institutional legitimacy contributes to the formation of the first technology standard. Finally, we elaborate both the theoretical and practical implications for enterprises in the competition of technology standards.

Key words: technology standard, open innovation, absorptive capacity, legitimacy distance, institutional legitimacy

高照军, 张宏如. 制度合法性与吸收能力影响技术标准竞争力的机制研究[J]. , 2019, 31(12): 73-84.

Gao Zhaojun, Zhang Hongru. A Study of How Institutional Legitimacy and Absorptive Capacity Influence Technology Standard Competence[J]. , 2019, 31(12): 73-84.

参考文献

[1] Gao X. D. A Latecomer's Strategy to Promote a Technology Standard:The Case of Datang and TD-SCDMA[J]. Research Policy, 2014,43(3):597-607
[2] Chesbrough H., Crowther A. K. Beyond High Tech:Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries[J]. R&D Management, 2006,36(3):229-236
[3] Lichtenthaler U. Open Innovation:Past Research, Current Debates, and Future Directions[J]. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2011,25(1):75-93
[4] 杨蕙馨,王硕,冯文娜. 网络效应视角下技术标准的竞争性扩散——来自iOS与Android之争的实证研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2014,(9):135-147
[5] De Maeijer E., Van Hout T., Weggeman M., et al. Studying Open Innovation Collaboration between the High-tech Industry and Science with Linguistic Ethnography-battling over the Status of Knowledge in a Setting of Distrust[J]. Journal of Innovation Management, 2017,4(4):8-31
[6] Dahlander L., Gann D. M. How Open is Innovation?[J]. Research Policy, 2010,39(6):699-709
[7] 杨书燕,吴小节,汪秀琼. 制度逻辑研究的文献计量分析[J]. 管理评论, 2017,29(3):90-109
[8] 高照军,武常岐. 制度理论视角下的企业创新行为研究——基于国家高新区企业的实证分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2014,32(10):1580-1592
[9] 田宇,杨艳玲. 贫困地区新创企业创业者关系网络对其组织合法性的影响机制研究[J]. 管理学报, 2017,14(2):176-184
[10] Liou R. S., Chao M. C., Ellstrand A. Unpacking Institutional Distance:Addressing Human Capital Development and Emerging-Market Firms' Ownership Strategy in an Advanced Economy[J]. Thunderbird International Business Review, 2016,59(3):281-295
[11] 高照军,张宏如,蒋耘莛. 制度合法性距离、二次创新与开放式创新绩效的关系研究[J]. 管理评论, 2018,30(3):47-59
[12] Huizingh E. K. Open Innovation:State of the Art and Future Perspectives[J]. Technovation, 2011,31(1):2-9
[13] Mention A. L. Co-operation and Co-operation as Open Innovation Practices in the Service Sector:Which Influence on Innovation Novelty?[J]. Technovation, 2011,31(1):44-53
[14] Farrell J., Saloner G. Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 1985,16(1):70-83
[15] Katz M. L., Shapiro C. Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility[J]. The American Economic Review, 1985,75(3):424-440
[16] 李冬梅,宋志红. 网络模式、标准联盟与主导设计的产生[J]. 科学学研究, 2017,35(3):428-437
[17] 王道平,韦小彦,方放. 基于技术标准特征的标准研发联盟合作伙伴选择研究[J]. 科研管理, 2015,36(1):81-89
[18] 魏津瑜,刘月,南广友,等. 基于技术标准的高技术产业集群创新绩效与定价模式研究[J]. 科学管理研究, 2017,35(1):51-54
[19] Chiang Y. H., Hung K. P. Exploring Open Search Strategies and Perceived Innovation Performance from the Perspective of Inter-organizational Knowledge Flows[J]. R&D Management, 2010,40(3):292-299
[20] 吴洁,彭星星,盛永祥,等. 基于动态控制模型的产学研知识转移合作博弈研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017,25(3):190-196
[21] Faems D., De Visser M., Andries P., et al. Technology Alliance Portfolios and Financial Performance:Value-enhancing and Cost-increasing Effects of Open Innovation[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2010,27(6):785-796
[22] Roldán Bravo M. I., Lloréns Montes F. J., Ruiz Moreno A. Open Innovation and Quality Management:The Moderating Role of Interorganisational IT Infrastructure and Complementary Learning Styles[J]. Production Planning & Control, 2017,28(9):744-757
[23] Srivastava M. K., Gnyawali D. R., Hatfield D. E. Behavioral Implications of Absorptive Capacity:The Role of Technological Effort and Technological Capability in Leveraging Alliance Network Technological Resources[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2015,92:346-358
[24] Martinkenaite I., Breunig K. J. The Emergence of Absorptive Capacity through Micro-macro Level Interactions[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2016,69(2):700-708
[25] 龙勇,梅德强,常青华. 风险投资对高新技术企业技术联盟策略影响——以吸收能力为中介的实证研究[J]. 科研管理, 2011,32(7):76-84
[26] Gao Z. J. How SOEs Succeed in Privatization:Net Political Benefits and Learning in Networks[J]. Nankai Business Review International, 2011,2(3):257-274
[27] Meyer K., Estrin S., Bhaumik S., et al. Institutions, Resources, and Entry Strategies in Emerging Economies[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2009,30(1):61-80
[28] Bitektine A., Haack P. The "Macro" and the "Micro" of Legitimacy:Toward a Multilevel Theory of the Legitimacy Process[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2015,40(1):49-75
[29] Chen S. T., Haga K. Y. A., Fong C. M. The Effects of Institutional Legitimacy, Social Capital, and Government Relationship on Clustered Firms' Performance in Emerging Economies[J]. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2016,29(4):529-550
[30] Bjerregaard T. Studying Institutional Work in Organizations:Uses and Implications of Ethnographic Methodologies[J]. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2011,24(1):51-64
[31] 王晓红,谢兰兰. 金融危机后全球跨国直接投资的主要特征及趋势研究[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2017,(3):32-47
[32] Thomas A. S., Litschert R. J., Ramaswarmy K. The Performance Impact of Strategy-manager Coalignment:An Empirical Examination[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1991,12(7):509-522
[33] 张宏如. 中国式EAP:科技创新人才激励的新视角[J]. 科学管理研究, 2012,30(6):85-88