核心企业网络能力与集群协同创新：一个具有中介的双调节效应模型

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

开放式创新背景下，如何驱动集群协同创新是产业集群转型研究的重要问题。以集群网络核心企业作为切入点，从网络能力视角，探索核心企业网络能力是否、如何以及何时对集群企业探索式和利用式协同创新绩效产生影响，揭示核心企业引领集群协同创新的机制“黑箱”。基于5个地区16个产业集群的55家核心企业以及231家集群成员企业的实证数据，运用Mplus检验模型进行实证分析。研究结果显示：（1）网络能力是核心企业引领集群协同创新的重要因素，核心企业的网络能力对集群企业探索式和利用式协同创新的促进作用明显。（2）双重网络嵌入是核心企业网络能力与集群企业协同创新之间的中介“桥梁”。（3）环境动态性和集群企业知识整合能力在核心企业网络能力与集群协同创新之间发挥有中介的调节作用。外部环境动态性和集群企业知识整合能力越强，核心企业网络能力对集群企业协同创新的积极影响越明显。（4）环境动态性的调节作用部分通过双重网络嵌入中介作用实现，而知识整合能力的调节效应完全借助双重网络嵌入的中介作用实现。最后，从利益相关者的视角，对集群企业、核心企业以及政府部门分别提出了相应的管理实践建议。

关键词: 网络能力, 双重网络嵌入, 协同创新, 核心企业, 集群创新

Abstract:

In the context of open innovation, how to drive the collaborative innovation within an industrial cluster has been a hot topic in the area of industrial cluster transformation and updating. Because ofits core position in innovation network, the focal firm was considered as a significant antecedent variable influencing collaborative innovation performance of non-core enterprises. However, the present literatures fail to explain the relationship between the characteristics of focal firms and the cluster collaborative innovation. To fill this gap, from the perspective of network capability, we establish a mechanism model to identify whether, how and when the network capability of focal firms has an effect on the cluster collaborative innovation. Based on the empirical data of 144 focal firms and 358 non-core enterprises gathered from 24 industrial clusters in five different provinces of China, the theoretical hypothesis is verified by the Mplus method. Research results demonstrate that:(1) Network capability is an important factor for core firms leading the cluster collaborative innovation, and the network capability of core firms is positively related to exploratory and exploitative collaborative innovation; (2) Network capability of core firms affects the cluster collaborative innovation via dual network embeddedness; (3) Environment dynamic and knowledge integration capacity of cluster enterprises have a moderated mediation effect on the relationship between network capability of core firms and cluster collaborative innovation, which means that the direct effect of network capability on cluster collaborative innovation is significantly stronger when either environment dynamic or knowledge integration capacity is high; (4) the moderating effect of environmental dynamic is realized partly through the mediating effect of dual network embeddedness, while the moderating effect of knowledge integration capacity is realized fully by the mediating effect of dual network embeddedness. Finally, from the perspective of stakeholders, corresponding management suggestions are proposed for focal firms, the non-core cluster enterprises and government authorities.

Key words: network capacity, dual network embeddedness, collaborative innovation, focal firm, cluster innovation

倪渊. 核心企业网络能力与集群协同创新：一个具有中介的双调节效应模型[J]. , 2019, 31(12): 85-99.

Ni Yuan. How does the Network Capability of Focal Firm Affect Cluster Collaborative Innovation? A Mediated Dual Moderation Effect Model[J]. , 2019, 31(12): 85-99.

参考文献

[1] 白俊红,蒋伏心. 协同创新、空间关联与区域创新绩效[J]. 经济研究, 2015,50(7):174-187
[2] 宋晶,孙永磊. 合作创新网络能力的形成机理研究——影响因素探索和实证分析[J]. 管理评论, 2016,28(3):67-75
[3] Wang C., Rodan S., Fruin M., et al. Knowledge Networks, Collaboration Networks, and Exploratory Innovation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2014,57(2):484-514
[4] 项后军,裘斌斌,周宇. 核心企业视角下不同集群演化过程的比较研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2015,33(2):225-233
[5] Adner R., Kapoor R. Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems:How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010,31(3):306-333
[6] Pierce L. Big Losses in Ecosystem Niches:How Core Firm Decisions Drive Complementary Product Shakeouts[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2009,30(3):323-347
[7] Yu B., Hao S., Ahlstrom D., et al. Entrepreneurial Firms' Network Competence, Technological Capability, and New Product Development Performance[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2014,31(3):687-704
[8] Hakansson H. Industrial Technological Development:A Network Approach[M]. London:Croom Helm, 1987
[9] Ritter T. The Networking Company:Antecedents for Coping with Relationships and Networks Effectively[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 1999,28(5):467-479
[10] Möller K. K., Halinen A. Business Relationships and Networks:Managerial Challenges of Network Era[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 1999,28(5):413-427
[11] 徐金发,许强,王勇. 企业的网络能力剖析[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2001,23(11):21-25
[12] 方刚. 基于资源观的企业网络能力与创新绩效关系研究[D]. 浙江大学博士学位论文, 2008
[13] 郝斌,任浩. 企业间领导力:一种理解联盟企业行为与战略的新视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2011,25(3):109-118
[14] 陈劲,阳银娟. 协同创新的理论基础与内涵[J]. 科学学研究, 2012,30(2):161-164
[15] Ollila S., Yström A. Exploring Design Principles of Organizing for Collaborative Innovation:The Case of an Open Innovation Initiative[J]. Creativity & Innovation Management, 2016,25(3):363-377
[16] Xie X., Fang L., Zeng S. Collaborative Innovation Network and Knowledge Transfer Performance:A FsQCA Approach[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2016,69(11):5210-5215
[17] 解学梅,吴永慧,赵杨. 协同创新影响因素与协同模式对创新绩效的影响——基于长三角316家中小企业的实证研究[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(8):77-89
[18] 张永安,王燕妮. 核心企业创新网络结构、类型解析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2010,31(12):50-55
[19] Schreiner M., Kale P., Corsten D. What Really Is Alliance Management Capability and How does It Impact Alliance Outcomes and Success?[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2009,30(13):1395-1419
[20] Bouncken R. B., Pesch R., Kraus S. SME Innovativeness in Buyer-Seller Alliances:Effects of Entry Timing Strategies and Inter-Organizational Learning[J]. Review of Managerial Science, 2015,9(2):361-384
[21] Emmoth A., Persson S. G., Lundberg H. Interpartner Legitimacy Effects on Cluster Initiative Formation and Development Processes[J]. European Planning Studies, 2015,23(5):892-908
[22] 谢永平,党兴华,毛雁征. 技术创新网络核心企业领导力与网络绩效研究[J]. 预测, 2012,31(5):21-27
[23] Expósitolanga M., Tomásmiquel J., Molinamorales F. X. Innovation in Clusters:Exploration Capacity, Networking Intensity and External Resources[J]. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2015,28(1):26-42
[24] 魏江,徐蕾. 知识网络双重嵌入, 知识整合与集群企业创新能力[J]. 管理科学学报, 2014,17(2):34-47
[25] Lombardi M. The Role of Leading Firms in the Evolution of SME Clusters:Evidence from the Leather Products Cluster in Florence[J]. European Planning Studies, 2012,22(22):1199-1211
[26] Ahuja G. Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation:A Longitudinal Study[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2000,45(3):425-455
[27] 王海花,谢富纪. 企业外部知识网络能力的结构测量——基于结构洞理论的研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2012,26(7):134-146
[28] 邓渝,邵云飞. 联盟组合伙伴选择、双元组织学习与创新能力关系研究[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2016,28(6):1-9
[29] Balland P. A., Belsomartínez J. A., Morrison A. The Dynamics of Technical and Business Knowledge Networks in Industrial Clusters:Embeddedness, Status, or Proximity?[J]. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 2015,92(1):35-60
[30] 王琳,魏江,饶扬德,等. 知识密集服务关系嵌入与制造企业服务创新:探索性学习的中介作用和技术能力的调节作用[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2017,29(1):106-115
[31] Gilsing V. A., Duysters G. M. Understanding Novelty Creation in Exploration Networks-Structural and Relational Embeddedness Jointly Considered[J]. Technovation, 2008, 28(10):693-708
[32] Oehmichen J., Puck J. Embeddedness, Ownership Mode and Dynamics, and the Performance of MNE Subsidiaries[J]. Journal of International Management, 2016,22(1):17-28
[33] 刘群慧,李丽. 关系嵌入性、机会主义行为与合作创新意愿——对广东省中小企业样本的实证研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2013,34(7):85-96
[34] 朱梦璐. 网络嵌入性视角下高技术企业位势跃迁模式研究[D]. 浙江工商大学硕士学位论文, 2015
[35] 王永健,谢卫红,王田绘,等. 强弱关系与突破式创新关系研究——吸收能力的中介作用和环境动态性的调节效应[J]. 管理评论, 2016,28(10):111-122
[36] Wu X., Dou W., Du J., et al. Production Network Positions, Innovation Orientation and Environmental Dynamics:An Empirical Analysis of Chinese Firms[J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 2015,67(1):77-102
[37] 王启亮,虞红霞. 协同创新中组织声誉与组织间知识分享——环境动态性的调节作用研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2016,34(3):425-432
[38] Knudsen M. P. The Relative Importance of Interfirm Relationships and Knowledge Transfer for New Product Development Success[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2010,24(2):117-138
[39] Ryoo S. Y., Kim K. K. The Impact of Knowledge Complementarities on Supply Chain Performance through Knowledge Exchange[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015,42(6):3029-3040
[40] Strambach S., Klement B. Cumulative and Combinatorial Micro-Dynamics of Knowledge:The Role of Space and Place in Knowledge Integration[J]. European Planning Studies, 2012,20(11):1843-1866
[41] Katsuki F., Hanafusa K., Yonemura M., et al. Empirical Research of the Relationship between Relational Networks,Inter-organizational Knowledge Integration and Innovation Performance[J]. Journal of Industrial Technological Economics, 2012,89(8):4643-4647
[42] 冉龙,陈劲,董富全. 企业网络能力, 创新结构与复杂产品系统创新关系研究[J]. 科研管理, 2013,34(8):1-8
[43] 马鸿佳,董保宝,葛宝山. 高科技企业网络能力, 信息获取与企业绩效关系实证研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2010,28(1):127-132
[44] 任胜钢,孟宇,王龙伟. 企业网络能力的结构测度与实证研究[J]. 管理学报, 2011,8(4):531-538
[45] Granovetter M. Economic Action and Social Structure:The Problem of Embeddedness[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1985,91(3):481-510
[46] 赵炎,周娟. 企业合作网络中嵌入性及联盟类型对创新绩效影响的实证研究——以中国半导体战略联盟网络为例[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2013,25(1):12-23
[47] Zahra S. A., Ireland R. D., Hitt M. A. International Expansion by New Venture Firms:International Diversity, Mode of Market Entry, Technological Learning, and Performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2000,43(5):925-950
[48] Jansen J. J. P., Van Den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W. Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance:Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators[J]. Management Science, 2006,52(11):1661-1674
[49] Lichtenthaler U. Outbound Open Innovation and Its Effect on Firm Performance:Examining Environmental Influences[J]. R&D Management, 2009,39(4):317-330
[50] 叶宝娟,温忠麟. 有中介的调节模型检验方法:甄别和整合[J]. 心理学报, 2013,45(9):1050-1060