不同联盟规模下产学研联盟稳定性影响因素及演化研究

›› 2016, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 3-14.

• 经济与金融管理 • 下一篇

不同联盟规模下产学研联盟稳定性影响因素及演化研究

曹霞, 于娟, 张路蓬

哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院, 哈尔滨 150001

收稿日期:2015-04-28 出版日期:2016-02-28 发布日期:2016-03-01
作者简介:曹霞,哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士;于娟,哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院博士研究生;张路蓬,哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院博士研究生.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(71473055);教育部人文社会科学研究项目(14YJA630002);黑龙江省普通高等学校青年学术骨干支持计划(1252G015);中央高校基本科研业务经费支持计划(HEUCFZ1604);哈尔滨市科技攻关计划(2009AC9CT108).

Affecting Factors and Evolution of the Stability of Industry-University-Research Institute Alliance under Different Alliance Scales

Cao Xia, Yu Juan, Zhang Lupeng

School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001

Received:2015-04-28 Online:2016-02-28 Published:2016-03-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

产学研联盟是科技成果创造和转化的有效途径,其稳定运行对提升我国自主创新能力具有重要作用.该研究基于文献萃取方法挖掘产学研联盟稳定性的影响因素,并剖析影响因素与产学研联盟稳定性的关系.然后,基于经济学、演化博弈理论和BA无标度理论,运用Matlab软件仿真分析影响因素对产学研联盟稳定性的影响,结果表明:无论大规模还是小规模联盟,企业和学研机构的知识转移效率都高时,联盟保持稳定;当学研机构知识转移效率高时,大规模联盟中企业知识转移效率只要不太低,联盟会趋于稳定,但当企业知识转移效率高时,大小规模联盟中学研机构知识转移效率都高,才能保持联盟稳定;对利益分配而言,小规模联盟按劳分配利益才能稳固联盟关系,而大规模联盟中按劳分配和均分利益均会促使联盟趋向持续协同创新的稳态.

关键词: 产学研联盟, 稳定性, 联盟规模, 知识转移效率, 利益分配

Abstract:

Industry-university-research institute alliance (IURA) is an effective way for improving the outputs and transformation of scientific achievements and its stability has an important role on the development of technological innovation and economy. The affecting factors of the stability of IURA are mined by the method of literature extraction, and the relations between the influences and stability of IURA are analyzed. And then based on the theory of economics, evolutionary game and BA scale-free, the functions of affecting factors on the stability of IURA are simulated using matlab in present work. The results show that, whether the alliance scale is big or small, when knowledge transfer efficiency of both is high, the alliance can remain stable; under the condition of university-research with high knowledge transfer efficiency, when that of industry is not low in large-scale alliance, the alliance also can remain stable; but under the condition of industry with high knowledge transfer efficiency, when that of university-research is high both in large or small scale alliance, the alliance can remain stable; for profit allocation, distribution according to work can keep the stability of small-scale alliance, and distribution according to work or equally can make large-scale alliance tend stable.

Key words: industry-university-research institute alliance, stability, alliance scale, knowledge transfer efficiency, profit allocation

曹霞, 于娟, 张路蓬. 不同联盟规模下产学研联盟稳定性影响因素及演化研究[J]. , 2016, 28(2): 3-14.

Cao Xia, Yu Juan, Zhang Lupeng. Affecting Factors and Evolution of the Stability of Industry-University-Research Institute Alliance under Different Alliance Scales[J]. , 2016, 28(2): 3-14.

参考文献

[1] Plewa C., Korff N., Johnson C., et al. The Evolution of University-industry linkages——A Framework[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2013,30(1):21-44
[2] Jackson M. O., Watts A. The Evolution of Social and Economic Networks[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 2002,106(2):265-295
[3] Freitas B. M., Marques R. A. University-industry Collaboration and Innovation in Emergent and Mature Industries in New Industrialized Countries[J]. Research Policy, 2013,42(2):443-453
[4] Xu J., Yuan L., Gao S. X. The Stability of Strategic Alliances: Characteristic, Factors and Stages[J]. Journal of International Management, 2008,14(2):173-189
[5] 原毅军,田宇,孙佳.产学研技术联盟稳定性的系统动力学建模与仿真[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2013,34(4):3-9
[6] 曾德明,王燕平,文金艳,等.高技术企业创新联盟稳定性研究[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2015,27(1):44-50
[7] Maietta O. W. Determinants of University-firm R&D Collaboration and Its Impact on Innovation: A Perspective from a Low-tech Industry[J]. Research Policy, 2015,44(7):1341-1359
[8] Hemmert M., Bstieler L., Okamuro H. Bridging the Cultural Divide: Trust Formation in University-industry Research Collaborations in the US, Japan, and South Korea[J]. Technovation, 2014,34(10):605-616
[9] Michael D., Konig S., Battiston M., et al. Recombinant Knowledge and the Evolution of Innovation Networks[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2011,79(3):145-164
[10] Niedergassel B., Leker J. Different Dimensions of Knowledge in Cooperative R&D Projects of University Scientists[J]. Technovation, 2011,31(4):142-150
[11] Drozdoff V., Fairbairn D. Licensing Biotech Intellectual Property in University-industry Partnerships[J]. Cold Spring Harbor Perspec Tives in Medicine, 2015,5(3):1-12
[12] Chen S. H., Huang M. H., Chen D. Z. Driving Factors of External Funding and Funding Effects on Academic Innovation Performance in University-industry-government Linkages[J]. Scientometrics, 2013,94(3):1077-1098
[13] 曹霞,于娟.产学研合作创新稳定性研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2015,33(5):741-747
[14] 张坚.竞争性企业技术联盟的知识共享效应研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2006,36(12):48-54
[15] 李雪松,衣保中,郭晓立.区域环境合作联盟: 规模与稳定性分析[J]. 商业研究, 2014,(6):32-36
[16] 杜晓君,罗猷韬,马大明,等.专利联盟的累进创新效应研究[J]. 管理科学, 2011,24(6):49-56
[17] Pérez-Nordtvedt L., Kedia B. L., Datta D. K., et al. Effectiveness and Efficiency of Cross-border Knowledge Transfer: An Empirical Examination[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2008,45(4):714-744
[18] Jiang Z. S., Hu L. Y., Chen K. K. Decisions of Knowledge Transfer in Technology Innovation Alliance: A Stackelberg Leader-followers Model[J]. Operational Research, 2010,10(2):231-242
[19] Lee S. C., Liang H., Liu C. Y. The Effects of Absorptive Capacity, Knowledge Sourcing Strategy, and Alliance Forms on Firm Performance[J]. The Service Industries Journal, 2010,30(14):2421-2440
[20] Teo T. S. H., Bhattacherjee A. Knowledge Transfer and Utilization in IT Outsourcing Partnerships: A Preliminary Model of Antecedents and Outcomes[J]. Information & Management, 2014,52(2):177-186
[21] Ankrah S. N., Burgess T. F., Grimshaw P., et al. Asking Both University and Industry Actors about Their Engagement in Knowledge Transfer: What Single-group Studies of Motives Omit[J]. Technovation, 2013,33(2-3):50-65
[22] 谭云清,翟森竞.国际外包中跨国公司知识转移运行机制研究: 来自中国提供商的证据[J]. 管理评论, 2014,26(8):200-208
[23] 张家琛.产学研技术联盟伙伴利益分配风险补偿研究[J]. 统计与决策, 2013,(6):168-170
[24] 陈伟,张永超,马一博,等.基于AHP-GEM-Shapley值法的低碳技术创新联盟利益分配研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2012,21(4):220-226
[25] Joseph K., Thevaranjan A. Monitoring and Incentives in Sales Organizations: An Agency-theoretic Perspective[J]. Marketing Science, 1998,17(2):107-123
[26] 来向红,王文平.互补性研发努力下垂直合作新产品开发中的收益共享契约设计[J]. 管理学报, 2013,10(3):430-437
[27] 魏静,朱恒民,宋瑞晓,等.在线知识转移网络的复杂性扩散研究[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(7):58-65
[28] 周钟,陈智高.产业集群网络中知识转移行为仿真分析[J]. 管理科学学报, 2015,18(1):41-49
[29] Lin M., Li N. Scale-free Network Provides an Optimal Pattern for Knowledge Transfer[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2010,389(3):473-480
[30] 蒋樟生,胡珑瑛,田也壮.基于知识转移价值的产业技术创新联盟稳定性研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2009,26(S2):506-511
[31] 吴福象,蒋天颖,孙伟.网络位置、知识转移对集群企业竞争优势的影响——一项基于对温州乐清低压电器产业集群的实证研究[J]. 科研管理, 2013,34(12):48-57
[32] 丁旭,黄波,孟卫东.基于投资溢出的供应链研发联盟利益分配方式研究[J]. 预测, 2011,(5):48-53

不同联盟规模下产学研联盟稳定性影响因素及演化研究

Affecting Factors and Evolution of the Stability of Industry-University-Research Institute Alliance under Different Alliance Scales

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	贺一堂, 谢富纪. 产-学研协同创新的随机演化博弈分析[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(6): 150-162.
[2]	常雅楠, 王松江. 激励视角下的PPP项目利益分配——以亚投行支撑中国企业投资GMS国家基础设施项目为例[J]. , 2018, 30(11): 257-265.
[3]	王祥兵. 连续时间的IS-LM模型稳定性与仿真研究[J]. , 2018, 30(1): 67-77,153.
[4]	罗吉, 党兴华. 我国风险投资机构网络社群:结构识别、动态演变与偏好特征研究[J]. , 2016, 28(5): 61-72.
[5]	顾晓安, 朱书龙. 单个银行短期稳定性水平测度研究——基于修正的流动性缺口率指标[J]. , 2016, 28(2): 35-48,73.