Formation Mechanism of Objective Deviation in the Process of the Safety Evaluation System

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to study the reason of objective deviation in the process of marketization of the safety evaluation system, grounded theory is applied in the research and a model of interaction of three participants is established by means of in-depth interview. It is found in this paper that local safety inspection authorities prefer symbolic inspection strategies, service agencies prefer self-preservation and profit-seeking strategies, small and medium enterprises prefer faking compliance. These strategies are formed under their dominant logics, resource dependence as well as the influence of other two participants' behavior strategies. These passive behavioral strategies have negative effect on the interaction and may lead to the objective deviation of the safety.

Key words: work safety, safety evaluation institution, market operation, objective deviation, formation mechanism, grounded theory

Mei Qiang, Zhang Jingjing, Liu Suxia, Zhong Jingjing, Wang Qiwei. Formation Mechanism of Objective Deviation in the Process of the Safety Evaluation System[J]. , 2017, 29(5): 216-225.

References

[1] Daft R. Organization Theory and Design[M]. Kentucky: Cengage Learning, 2012
[2] Scott W. R., Davis G. F. Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open Systems Perspectives[M]. London: Routledge, 2015
[3] Olsen K. B., Hasle P. The Role of Intermediaries in Delivering An Occupational Health and Safety Programme Designed for Small Businesses——A Case Study of An Insurance Incentive Programme in The Aagriculture Sector[J]. Safety Science, 2015,71:242-252
[4] Cunningham T. R., Sinclair R. Application of A Model for Delivering Occupational Safety and Health to Smaller Businesses: Case Studies from The US[J]. Safety Science, 2015,71:213-225
[5] Tucker S., Turner N. Safety Voice among Young Workers Facing Dangerous Work: A Policy-Capturing Aproach[J]. Safety Science, 2014,62:530-537
[6] Patschke C. Complying with OSHA's RNEP, CNEP, and VPP RAGAGEP[J]. Process Safety Progress, 2011,30(2):191-195
[7] Santos G., Barros S., Mendes F., et al. The Main Benefits Associated with Health and Safety Management Systems Certification in Portuguese Small and Medium Enterprises Post Quality Management System Certification[J]. Safety Science, 2013,51(1):29-36
[8] Kvorning L. V., Hasle P., Christensen U. Motivational Factors Influencing Small Construction and Auto Repair Enterprises to Participate in Occupational Health and Safety Programmes[J]. Safety Science, 2015,71:253-263
[9] Zwetsloot G. I. J. M., Zwanikken S., Hale A. Policy Expectations and The Use of Market Mechanisms for Regulatory OSH Certification and Testing Regimes[J]. Safety Science, 2011,49(7):1007-1013
[10] Masi D., Cagno E. Barriers to OHS Interventions in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises[J]. Safety Science, 2015,71:226-241
[11] 沈斌,梅强. 煤炭企业安全生产管制多方博弈研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010,20(9):139-144
[12] 梅强,马国建,杜建国,等. 中小企业安全生产管制路径演化研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009,17(2):160-167
[13] Oliver C. Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1991,16(1):145-179
[14] Selznick P. Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation[M]. California: Univercity of California Press, 2011
[15] Cornforth C. Understanding and Combating Mission Drift in Social Enterprises[J]. Social Enterprise Journal, 2014,10(1):3-20
[16] Jung C. S. Organizational Goal Ambiguity and Performance: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Relationships[J]. International Public Management Journal, 2011,14(2):193-217
[17] Stazyk E. C., Goerdel H. T. The Benefits of Bureaucracy: Public Managers' Perceptions of Political Support, Goal Ambiguity, and Organizational Effectiveness[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2011,21(4):645-672
[18] Jentoft S., Chuenpagdee R., Pascual-Fernandez J. J. What Are MPAs for: on Goal Formation and Displacement[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2011,54(1):75-83
[19] Oliver C. The Influence of Institutional and Task Environment Relationships on Organizational Performance: The Canadian Construction Industry[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 1997,34(1):99-124
[20] Resh W. G., Marvel J. D. Loopholes to Load-Shed: Contract Management Capacity, Representative Bureaucracy, and Goal Displacement in Federal Procurement Decisions[J]. International Public Management Journal, 2012,15(4):525-547
[21] 陈钰. 目标置换的成因、对策研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2012,(5):207-210
[22] 陈艳莹,夏一平. 社会网络与市场中介组织行为异化——中国省份面板数据的实证研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2011,(11):148-157
[23] 刘焕,吴建南,徐萌萌. 不同理论视角下的目标偏差及影响因素研究述评[J]. 公共行政评论, 2016,(1):151-171
[24] Liang J., Langbein L. Performance Management, High-Powered Incentives, and Environmental Policies in China[J]. International Public Management Journal, 2015,18(3):346-385
[25] Zhou X. The Institutional Logic of Collusion among Local Governments in China[J]. Modern China, 2010,36(1):47-78
[26] Resh W. G., Pitts D. W. No Solutions, Only Trade-Offs? Evidence about Goal Conflict in Street-Level Bureaucracies[J]. Public Administration Review, 2013,73(1):132-142
[27] Islam S. Programmed Initiative, Reaching The Extreme Poor and MFI Sustainability: Mission Drift or Diseconomy?[J]. General Information, 2014,83(3):446-456
[28] Lebovics M., Hermes N., Hudon M. Are Financial and Social Efficiency Mutually Exclusive? A Case Study of Vietnamese Microfinance Institutions[J]. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 2016,87(1):55-77
[29] Hermes N., Lensink R., Meesters A. Outreach and Efficiency of Microfinance Institutions[J]. World Development, 2011,39(6):938-948
[30] Mersland R., Strom R. Microfinance Mission Drift?[J]. World Development, 2010,38(1):28-36
[31] Serrano-Cinca C., Gutiérrez-Nieto B. Microfinance, The Long Tail and Mission Drift[J]. International Business Review, 2014,23(1):181-194
[32] 王修华,李汪,肖燕飞. 微型金融机构目标偏移研究[J]. 华东经济管理, 2015,29(5):103-107
[33] 胡金焱,姜斐然. 小额贷款公司的目标偏移:鲁省个案[J]. 改革, 2015,(11):105-115
[34] Newig J., Koontz T. M. Multi-Level Governance, Policy Implementation and Participation: The EU's Mandated Participatory Planning Approach to Implementing Environmental Policy[J]. Journal of European Public Policy, 2014,21(2):248-267
[35] 吴远来,梅雨. 宅基地置换实践中政府行为偏差分析[J]. 农业经济问题, 2014,35(11):104-108
[36] 胡业飞,崔杨杨. 模糊政策的政策执行研究——以中国社会化养老政策为例[J]. 公共管理学报, 2015,12(2):93-105
[37] 吴建南,刘焕,阎波. 创新型省份建设的多案例分析[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2015,(9):87-91
[38] 杨丽丽,龚会莲. 公共政策执行中的目标置换行为及其治理[J]. 广西社会科学, 2014,34(6):143-147
[39] 钱振伟,王翔,张艳. 新型农村社会养老保险经办服务体系研究:基于政府购买服务理论视角[J]. 农业经济问题, 2011,32(2):59-62
[40] 洪勇,张红虹. 新兴产业培育政策传导机制的系统分析——兼评中国战略性新兴产业培育政策[J]. 中国软科学, 2015,(6):8-19
[41] 童心,于丽英. 高新技术产业集群政策有效性评价——以上海生物医药产业集群为例[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2015,36(6):15-25
[42] 马迎贤. 组织间关系:资源依赖视角的研究综述[J]. 管理评论, 2005,17(2):55-62
[43] 谢永平,孙永磊,张浩淼. 资源依赖、关系治理与技术创新网络企业核心影响力形成[J]. 管理评论, 2014,26(8):117-126
[44] Glaser B. G., Strauss A. L. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research[M]. London: Routledge, 1999
[45] 赵红丹,彭正龙. 基于扎根理论的强制性公民行为影响因素研究[J]. 管理评论, 2012,24(3):132-139
[46] Fassinger R. E. Paradigms, Praxis, Problems, and Promise: Grounded Theory in Counseling Psychology Research[J]. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2005,52(2):156-166
[47] Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective[M]. California: Stanford University Press, 2003
[48] Thornton P. H. Markets From Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing[M]. California: Stanford University Press, 2004
[49] 陈嘉文,姚小涛. 组织与制度的共同演化:组织制度理论研究的脉络剖析及问题初探[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(5):135-144