Exploring the Enterprise Boundary and Relevant Propositions by Studying the Governance Transaction Relationship and Business Transaction Relationship——Findings from a Multiple Cases Study

Abstract

Abstract:

Based on the theory of business model of the stakeholder's transaction structure, this paper analyzes the relation between the business transaction relationship and the governance transaction relationshipthrough case study. Our study shows that it's necessary to separate the business transaction relationship and the governance transaction relationship no matter an internal or external transaction is to be analyzed; the business transaction relationship mainly pays attention to the transaction contents and value distribution produced by the corresponding transaction, and the governance transaction relationship mainly pays attention to surplus value distribution of the stakeholders and the corresponding stakeholders. Clearly separating the business transaction relationship and the governance transaction relationship can not only help enterprises plan their commercial boundary, but also assist to promote the innovation of their business model.

Key words: governance transaction relationship, business transaction relationship, business model, commercial boundary, stakeholders

Wei Wei, Lin Guiping, Zhu Wuxiang. Exploring the Enterprise Boundary and Relevant Propositions by Studying the Governance Transaction Relationship and Business Transaction Relationship——Findings from a Multiple Cases Study[J]. , 2016, 28(4): 212-224.

References

[1] Coase R. H. The Nature of the Firm.,Economica[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 1937,16(4):386-405
[2] Williamson O. E. Transaction-Cost Economics:The Governance of Contractual Relations[C]. Journal of Law & Economics, 1979
[3] Williamson O. E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism:Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting[J]. American Political Science Association, 1987,32(4):61-75
[4] 张旭昆."交易成本"概念:层次、分类[J]. 商业经济与管理, 2012,(4):64-70
[5] 龙勇,郑景丽,吴海春.战略联盟中交易成本、联盟能力对效率边界影响的实证研究[J]. 管理评论, 2012,24(12):107-114
[6] 王竹泉,杜媛.利益相关者视角的企业形成逻辑与企业边界分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2012(3):108-120
[7] 迈克尔.迪屈奇.交易成本经济学[M]. 北京:经济科学出版社, 1999
[8] 黄少安.交易费用理论的主要缺陷分析(上)[J]. 学习与探索, 1996,(4):4-10
[9] 董华,赵生冬.企业边界理论的发展——观点比较与理论反思[J]. 工业技术经济, 2013,(7):143-153
[10] 焦凯.互联网思维对企业边界的影响[J]. 企业管理, 2015,(6):123-125
[11] 魏炜,林桂平,朱武祥.合伙人制:盛名之下有陷阱[J]. 中欧商业评论, 2015,(12):52-61
[12] 张茜,李靖宇,饶佳艺,乔晗,汪寿阳.基于利益相关者分析"女神的新衣":如何构建TV+商业模式[J].管理评论, 2015,27(8):234-240
[13] 汪寿阳,敖敬宁,乔晗,杨一帆,胡毅,姜懋.基于知识管理的商业模式冰山理论[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(6):3-10
[14] 魏炜,胡勇,陈伟剑.发现和打造企业竞争的三度空间——一个多案例研究[J]. 管理评论, 2016,28(1):229-240
[15] 曾楚宏,王斌.能力、交易费用与企业边界的变动[J]. 社会科学, 2011,(10):45-53
[16] Grossman S. J., Hart O. D. The Costs and Benefits of Ownership:A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1986,94(4):691-719
[17] 亨利.汉斯曼.企业所有权论[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社, 2001
[18] Cai H. A Theory of Joint Asset Ownership[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2003,34(1):63-77
[19] Garicano L., Santos T. Referrals[J]. American Economic Review, 2004,94(3):499-525
[20] Levin J., Tadelis S. Profit Sharing and the Role of Professional Partnerships[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2005,120(1):131-171
[21] 魏炜,朱武祥,林桂平.基于利益相关者交易结构的商业模式理论[J]. 管理世界, 2012,12(12):125-131
[22] 徐礼伯,沈坤荣.知识经济条件下企业边界的决定:内外社会资本匹配的视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2014,(10):85-96
[23] 魏炜,胡勇,朱武祥.变革性高速成长公司的商业模式创新奇迹——一个多案例研究的发现[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(7):218-231
[24] 魏炜,朱武祥,林桂平.商业模式的经济解释Ⅱ[M]. 北京:机械工业出版社,2014