Double Dividend Effect of Vehicle Pollutant Reduction Control Strategy

Abstract

Abstract: Urban traffic congestion and the resultant air pollution have become social and environmental problems that can't be ignored. Taking motor vehicles as an example, this paper introduces penalty mechanism to construct an improved model of motor vehicle pollutant emission reduction management. Through dynamic simulation, this paper explores the effects of different policies and schemes on the main variables, and then reveals the dividend effect of different strategies. The results show that:(1) Proper amount of fines can bring good economic and social benefits in such a way as to effectively reduce GDP depletion, inhibit illegal travel and ease off the traffic. (2) By comparing the effects of the three policies air pollution of charging fee (APCF), penalty and subsidy, it is found that:in terms of congestion mitigation, APCF > penalty > subsidy; in terms of reducing illegal motor vehicle travel, penalty > APCF > subsidy; in terms of emission reduction, APCF > subsidy > penalty; and the effects of subsidy and penalty are not obvious.

Key words: system dynamics, air pollution, traffic congestion, emission reduction, dividend effect

Jia Shuwei. Double Dividend Effect of Vehicle Pollutant Reduction Control Strategy[J]. Management Review, 2022, 34(6): 53-61,182.

References

[1] Perlmutt L. D., Cromar K. R. Comparing Associations of Respiratory Risk for the EPA Air Quality Index and Health-Based Air Quality Indices[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2019,202:1-7
[2] Hao Y., Peng H., Temulun T., et al. How Harmful Is Air Pollution to Economic Development?New Evidence from PM2.5 Concentrations of Chinese Cities[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018,172:743-757
[3] Lu Z. N., Chen H. Y., Hao Y., et al. The Dynamic Relationship between Environmental Pollution, Economic Development and Public Health:Evidence from China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017,166:134-147
[4] Du H. B., Liu D. Y., Southworth F., et al. Pathways for Energy Conservation and Emissions Mitigation in Road Transport up to 2030:A Case Study of the Jing-Jin-Ji Area, China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017,162:882-893
[5] 李涛,刘思玥.分权体制下辖区竞争、策略性财政政策对雾霾污染治理的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2018,28(6):120-129
[6] Wang K. L., Yin H. C., Chen Y. W. The Effect of Environmental Regulation on Air Quality:A Study of New Ambient Air Quality Standards in China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019,215:268-279
[7] 初钊鹏,卞晨,刘昌新,等.雾霾污染、规制治理与公众参与的演化仿真研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2019,29(7):101-111
[8] Jia S. W., Liu X. L., Yan G. L. Effect of APCF Policy on the Haze Pollution in China:A System Dynamics Approach[J]. Energy Policy, 2019,125:33-44
[9] Jia S. W., Yan G. L., Shen A. Z. Traffic and Emissions Impact of the Combination Scenarios of Air Pollution Charging Fee and Subsidy[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018,197:678-689
[10] Hua H., Li X., Zhang Y. Y., et al. Multi-objective Location-Routing Model for Hazardous Material Logistics with Traffic Restriction Constraint in Inter-city Roads[J]. Computers&Industrial Engineering, 2019,128:861-876
[11] Liu Y., Yan Z. J., Dong C. Health Implications of Improved Air Quality from Beijing's Driving Restriction Policy[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2016,219:323-328
[12] 易兰,周忆南,李朝鹏,等.城市机动车限行政策对雾霾污染治理的成效分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2018,28(10):81-87
[13] Carrillo P. E., Lopez-Luzuriaga A., Malik A. S. Pollution or Crime:The Effect of Driving Restrictions on Criminal Activity[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2018,164:50-69
[14] 邵帅,李欣,曹建华.中国的城市化推进与雾霾治理[J].经济研究, 2019, 54(2):148-165
[15] 陈诗一,陈登科.雾霾污染、政府治理与经济高质量发展[J].经济研究, 2018, 53(2):20-34
[16] 陈诗一,王建民.中国城市雾霾治理评价与政策路径研究:以长三角为例[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2018,28(10):71-80
[17] 李程宇,邵帅.可预期减排政策会引发"绿色悖论"效应吗?——基于中国供给侧改革与资本稀缺性视角的考察[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2017,37(5):1184-1200
[18] Zhang S. L., Li Y., Hao Y. Does Public Opinion Affect Air Quality?Evidence Based on the Monthly Data of 109 Prefecture-Level Cities in China[J]. Energy Policy, 2018,116:299-311
[19] Yuan H. P., Wang J. Y. A System Dynamics Model for Determining the Waste Disposal Charging Fee in Construction[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014,237:988-996
[20] 贾晓菁,寇晨欢,王正蒙,等.基于CET@I的二手车电子商务企业商业模式隐性知识动态反馈系统模型研究[J].管理评论, 2019,31(7):162-171
[21] 郭韬,丁小洲,任雪娇.制度环境、商业模式与创新绩效的关系研究——基于系统动力学的仿真分析[J].管理评论, 2019,31(9):193-206
[22] Musango J. K., Brent A. C., Bassi A. M. Modelling the Transition Towards a Green Economy in South Africa[J]. Technological Forecasting&Social Change, 2014,87:257-273
[23] Guo L. L., Qu Y., Wu C. Y., et al. Identifying a Pathway towards Green Growth of Chinese Industrial Regions Based on a System Dynamics Approach[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2018,128:143-154
[24] 李子民,仲丛林,刘佳佳,等.我国信托业发展的系统动力学仿真研究[J].管理评论, 2018,30(4):3-11
[25] Liu X., Ma S. F., Tian J. F., et al. A System Dynamics Approach to Scenario Analysis for Urban Passenger Transport Energy Consumption and CO₂ Emissions:A Case Study of Beijing[J]. Energy Policy, 2015,85:253-270
[26] Trappey A. J. C., Trappey C., Hsiao C. T., et al. An Evaluation Model for Low Carbon Island Policy:The Case of Taiwan's Green Transportation Policy[J]. Energy Policy, 2012,45:510-515
[27] Sahin O., Stewart R. A., Porter M. G. Water Security through Scarcity Pricing and Reverse Osmosis:A System Dynamics Approach[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015,88:160-171
[28] 于小兵,曹杰,王旭明,等.基于系统动力学的台风灾害应急策略研究[J].管理评论, 2018,30(2):222-230
[29] Jänicke M. "Green Growth":From a Growing Eco-Industry to Economic Sustainability[J]. Energy Policy, 2012,48:13-21
[30] Wang D., Nie R., Long R. Y., et al. Scenario Prediction of China's Coal Production Capacity Based on System Dynamics Model[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2018,129:432-442
[31] 朱明皓.城市交通拥堵的社会经济影响分析[D].北京交通大学博士学位论文, 2013
[32] 贾书伟,严广乐.基于SD-GM循环预测理论的机动车污染物收费政策效应分析[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2019,39(9):2436-2450
[33] 中华人民共和国环境保护部.中国机动车环境管理年报[Z]. 2015-2018
[34] 周雄勇,许志端,郗永勤.中国节能减排系统动力学模型及政策优化仿真[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2018,38(6):1422-1444