Incentive Mechanism between 4PL and 3PL Considering Reciprocal Preference in Agricultural Product Supply Chain Finance

Abstract

Abstract:

Agricultural product supply chain finance is the business expansion and theoretical extension of supply chain finance. Regarding principal-agent relationship between the fourth party logistics (4PLs) and the third party logistics (3PLs) as the research object, using the principal-agent theory, this paper constructs a non-profit index principal-agent model considering the reciprocal preference and studies the contract design between 4PLs and 3PLs from two aspects. Results show that 3PLs will increase some extra effort in return when 4PLs gives higher reward. When 4PLs offer the same extra fixed payment, and the stronger the sense of 3PLs' reciprocal preference is, the more 3PLs increases extra effort, the more profit 4PLs obtain.

Key words: agricultural product supply chain finance, third-party logistics (3PL), fourth-party logistics(4PL), incentive contract

Xu Peng, Wang Lei, Fu Hongyong, Chen Xiaoxu. Incentive Mechanism between 4PL and 3PL Considering Reciprocal Preference in Agricultural Product Supply Chain Finance[J]. , 2019, 31(1): 62-70.

References

[1] 李炎炎. 农产品供应链金融及其风险管理研究[J]. 商业时代, 2013,(17):84-85
[2] 宋华. 供应链金融[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2015
[3] Stefansson G. Collaborative Logistics Managment and the Role of Third-Party Service Providers[J]. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 2006,36(2):76-92
[4] Visser E. J. Logistics Innovation in Global Supply Chains:An Empirical Test of Dynamic Transantion-Cost Theory[J]. Geo Journal, 2007,70(2):213-226
[5] Fulconis F., Saglietto L., Pache G. Strategy Dynamics in the Logistics Industry a Transactional Center Perspective[J]. Management Decision, 2007,45(1):104-117
[6] Shi J., Guo J., Wang S., et al. Credit Risk Evaluation of Online Supply Chain Finance Based on Third-party B2B e-Commerce Platform:An Exploratory Research Based on China's Practice[J]. International Journal of u-and e-Service, Science and Technology, 2015,8(5):93-104
[7] 熊熊,马佳,赵文杰,等. 供应链金融模式下的信用风险评价[J]. 南开管理评论, 2009,12(4):92-98
[8] 胡海青,张琅,张宏道. 供应链金融视角下的中小企业信用风险评估研究:基于SVM与BP神经网络的比较研究[J]. 管理评论, 2012,24(11):70-80
[9] 冯耕中,何娟,李毅学,等. 物流金融创新:运作与管理[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2014
[10] 李毅学,汪寿阳,冯耕中. 物流金融中季节性存货质押融资质押率决策[J]. 管理科学学报, 2011,14(11):19-32
[11] 陈云,刘喜,杨琴. 基于清算延迟和流动性风险的供应链存货质押率研究[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(4):197-208
[12] 何娟,蒋祥林,朱道立,等. 考虑收益率自相关特征的存货质押动态质押率设定[J]. 管理科学, 2012,25(3):91-101
[13] 何娟,王建,蒋祥林. 存货质押业务质物组合价格风险决策[J]. 管理评论, 2013,25(11):163-176
[14] Buzacott J. A., Zhang R. Q. Inventory Management with Asset-Based Financing[J]. Management Science, 2004,50(9):1274-1292
[15] Jin Y., Wang S., Hu Q. Contract Type and Decision Right of Sales Promotion in Supply Chain Management with a Capital Constraiined Retailer[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2015,240(2):415-424
[16] Jing B., Seidmann A. Finance Sourcing in a Supply Chain[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2014,58(2):15-20
[17] Chen X. A Model of Trade Credit in a Capital Constrained Distribution Channel[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015,159(1):347-357
[18] 白少布,刘洪. 供应链融资的供应商与制造商委托代理激励机制研究[J]. 软科学, 2010,(10):23-25
[19] 于萍,徐渝. 存货质押三方契约中银行对物流企业的激励[J]. 运筹与管理, 2010,(3):15-20
[20] 徐鹏,王勇,杨金. 共同委托仓单质押下银行对3PL的激励和监督[J]. 科研管理, 2010,31(3):134-142
[21] 徐鹏,王勇,何定. 统一授信模式融通仓的4PL对3PL的激励契约[J]. 管理工程学报, 2012,26(3):50-54
[22] 何娟,王建,蒋祥林. 不完全信息下存货质押业务防合谋机制设计[J]. 软科学, 2012,26(8):141-145
[23] 史金召,郭菊娥,晏文隽. 在线供应链金融中银行与B2B平台的激励契约研究[J]. 管理科学, 2015,28(5):79-91
[24] 王勇,徐鹏. 考虑公平偏好的委托模式融通仓银行对3PL的激励[J]. 管理工程学报, 2010,24(1):95-100
[25] 杜少甫,杜婵,梁栋. 考虑公平关切的供应链契约与协调[J]. 管理科学学报, 2010,13(11):41-48
[26] 丁川. 基于完全理性和公平偏好的营销渠道委托代理模型比较研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2014,28(1):186-192
[27] 陈畴镛,黄贝拉. 互惠性偏好下的供应链金融委托带来模型比较研究[J]. 商业经济与管理, 2015,(12):52-60
[28] Rabin M. Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics[J]. The American Economics Review, 1993,83(5):1291-1302
[29] 蒲勇健. 建立在行为经济学理论基础上的委托-代理模型:物质效用与动机公平的替代[J]. 经济学季刊, 2007,(10):297-318
[30] 张同键,浦勇键. 互惠性偏好隐性知识转化与技术创新能力的相关性研究——基于研发型团队的数据检验[J]. 管理评论, 2010,22(10):100-106
[31] 蒲勇健. 植入公平博弈的委托代理模型:来自行为经济学的一个贡献[J]. 当代财经, 2007,(3):5-11
[32] 陈叶烽,叶航. 超越经济人的社会偏好理论:一个基于实验经济学的综述[J]. 南开经济研究, 2012,(1):63-65