Research on the Green Technological Innovation Performance and Driving Factors of High Patent-intensive Manufacturers in China

Abstract

Abstract:

Given the lack of researches on the green ecological transformation of high patent-intensive manufacturers, this paper uses improved SBM-DDF model to estimate the green technology innovation performance of 13 high patent-intensive manufacturers in China, and discusses the driving effect of its influence factors. The research shows that the innovation performance of the high patent-intensive manufacturers has not reached the level that they should have reached, and the industry heterogeneity characteristic is obvious. Communication equipment, computer and other electronic equipment manufacturers and other four industries rank highest for their best practice of green technology innovation. Pharmaceutical manufacturing, oil and gas extraction and chemical raw materials and chemical products manufacturing industries rank the lowest, failing to play the corresponding effect of low pollution and low energy consumption. The environmental regulation of the high patent-intensive manufacturers has an inhibition effect, and enterprise scale factor, capital deepening, market competition and foreign investment promote the industrial green technology performance significantly, but the technology import configuration structure has no obvious effect on the green technology performance.

Key words: green technological innovation performance, driving factors, high patent-intensive manufacturing, SBM-DDF model

Hou Jian, Chen Heng. Research on the Green Technological Innovation Performance and Driving Factors of High Patent-intensive Manufacturers in China[J]. , 2018, 30(4): 59-69.

References

[1] OECD. Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2011[R]. OECD, 2011
[2] US Patent. Intellectual Property and the U.S. Economy:Industries in Focus[R]. Economics and Statistics Administration and United States Patent and Trademark Office, 2012
[3] EPO OHIM. Intellectual Property Rights Intensive Industries:Contribution to Economic Performance and Employment in the European Union[R]. European Patent Office and the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market, 2013
[4] 李凤新,刘磊,倪苹,等. 中国产业专利密集度分析报告[J]. 科学观察, 2015, 10(3):21-49
[5] 彭峰. 高技术产业中技术转移与效率变化:中国工业企业的证据[D]. 武汉大学博士学位论文, 2013
[6] Magat W. Pollution Control and Technological Advance:A Dynamics Model of the Firm[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1978,5(1):1-25
[7] 王志平,陶长琪,沈鹏熠. 基于生态足迹的区域绿色技术效率及其影响因素研究[J]. 中国人口.资源与环境, 2014,24(1):35-40
[8] Chung Y. H., Fare R., Grosskopf S. Productivity and Undesirable Outputs:A Directional Distance Function Approach[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 1997,51(3):229-240
[9] Zhou Y., Xing X., Fang K., et al. Environmental Efficiency Analysis of Power Industry in China Based on An Entropy SBM model[J]. Energy Policy, 2013,57(7):68-75
[10] Wang K., Yu S. W., Zhang W. China's Regional Energy and Environmental Efficiency:A DEA Window Analysis Based Dynamic Evaluation[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2013,58(5-6):1117-1127
[11] Zhang N., Choi Y. Environmental Energy Efficiency of China's Regional Economics:A Non-oriented Slacks-based Measure Analysis[J]. The Social Science Journal, 2013,50(2):225-234
[12] Li H., Shi J. Energy Efficiency Analysis on Chinese Industrial Sectors:An Improved Super-SBM Model with Undesirable Outputs[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014,65(4):97-107
[13] 肖仁桥,王宗军,钱丽. 环境约束下中国省际工业企业技术创新效率研究[J]. 管理评论, 2014,26(6):56-66
[14] 王兆华,丰超. 中国区域全要素能源效率及其影响因素分析——基于2003-2010年的省际面板数据[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2015,35(6):1361-1372
[15] Porter M. E., Claas V. D. L. Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995,9(4):97-118
[16] Bohringer C., Moslener U., Oberndorfer U., et al. Clean and Productive? Empirical Evidence from the German Manufacturing Industry[J]. Research Policy, 2012,41(2):442-451
[17] Nesta L., Vona F., Nicolli F. Environmental Policies, Competition and Innovation in Renewable Energy[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2014,67(3):396-411
[18] Pan H., Zhang H., Zhang X. China's Provincial Industrial Energy Efficiency and its Determinants[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2013,58(5-6):1032-1039
[19] Lanoie P., Laurent-Lucchetti J., Johnstone N., et al. Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance:New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis[J]. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2011,20(3):803-842
[20] 张江雪,蔡宁,毛建素,等. 自主创新、技术引进与中国工业绿色增长——基于行业异质性的实证研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2015,33(2):185-194
[21] 张芊芊,余菜花,李廉水. 中国制造业资源环境保护能力驱动因素研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2015,(6):158-166
[22] Fukuyama H., Weber W. L. A Directional Slacks-based Measure of Technical Inefficiency[J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2009,43(4):274-287
[23] Tone K. Dealing with Undesirable Outputs in DEA:A Slacks Based Measure (SBM) Approach[R]. GRIPS Research Report Series, 2003
[24] 王兵,杨华,朱宁. 中国各省份农业效率和全要素生产率增长——基于SBM方向性距离函数的实证分析[J]. 南方经济, 2011,29(10):12-26
[25] 郝珍珍. 基于非参数前沿分析的工业环境绩效测度与评价[D]. 天津大学博士学位论文, 2014
[26] 钱丽,肖仁桥,陈忠卫. 环境约束、技术差距与企业创新效率——基于中国省际工业企业的实证研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2015,33(3):378-389
[27] 徐建中,曲小瑜. 装备制造业环境技术创新效率及其影响因素研究——基于DEA-Malmquist和Tobit的实证分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(1):246-254
[28] Frledl B., Getzner M. Determinants of CO2 Emissions in a Small Open Economy[J]. Ecological Economics, 2003,45(1):133-148
[29] 董敏杰,梁泳梅,李钢. 环境规制对中国出口竞争力的影响——基于投入产出表的分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2011,(3):57-67
[30] 谢子远,黄文军. 非研发创新支出对高技术产业创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2015,36(10):1-10
[31] Managl S. Trade Liberalization and the Environment:Carbon Dioxide for 1960-1999[J]. Economics Bulletin, 2004,17(1):1-5
[32] Javorcik B. S., Wei S. J. Pollution Havens and Foreign Direct Investment:Dirty Secret or Popular Myth?[J]. Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy, 2004,3(2):12-44
[33] 姜南,单晓光,漆苏. 知识产权密集型产业对中国经济的贡献研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2014,32(8):1157-1165
[34] 孙玮,陈燕,孙全亮. 中国制造业专利密度的行业分布特征及影响因素分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2015,36(4):95-104
[35] 屈小娥. 中国工业行业环境技术效率研究[J]. 经济学家, 2014,7(7):55-65
[36] Asane-Otoo E. Competition Policies and Environmental Quality:Empirical Analysis of the Electricity Sector in OECD Countries[J]. Energy Policy, 2016,95(8):212-223