Research on the Formation and Evolution Mechanism of Cooperation Network of Chinese Creative Research Group——Case Study of Excellent Creative Research Group in the Perspective of Scientific Community

Abstract

Abstract:

"Structural anomie" and "inefficient cooperation" are two problems confronting some teams in the operation of Creative Research Group. The starting point of understanding and solving these problems is to open the "black box" of Creative Research Group cooperation network, and reveal its evolution process and mechanism from the static structure level and the dynamic evolution level. Based on the scientific community under the spontaneous order, the cooperation network of Creative Research Group which is high level basic research and scientific and technological innovation team with Chinese characteristics is regarded as a special kind of scientific community, and its evolution process is summarized as "three stages and two turning points":the first is the stage of "invisible college"——after the "turning point of project approval" to enter into the stage of "scientific innovation team"——after the "turning point of transition" to enter into the stage of "mixed academic community"; Creative Research Group translates into the regular project team which has clear boundaries, from loose and spontaneous academic group which has cooperation basis, and finally, based on community the group deepens and expands into the "mixed academic community", and experiences an cooperation network evolution process of "fuzzy——clear-extended"; combined with the theory of team life-cycle and other organization and management theories, and through the analysis of the evolution mechanism of the group network and the exploratory case analysis of an excellent group, the "black box" of cooperation and development is initially opened, and the important nodes and stage divisions are dismantled from the perspective of organizational evolution, which has important significance for problem solving, reasonable development and effective governance of Creative Research Group.

Key words: Creative Research Group, cooperation network, spontaneous order, scientific community, knowledge map

Gao Jie, Ding Yunlong, Zheng Zuolong. Research on the Formation and Evolution Mechanism of Cooperation Network of Chinese Creative Research Group——Case Study of Excellent Creative Research Group in the Perspective of Scientific Community[J]. , 2018, 30(3): 248-263.

References

[1] 国家自然科学基金委. 国家自然科学基金创新研究群体项目管理办法[R]. 国家自然科学基金委, 2014
[2] 余谦,马俊杰,刘雅琴. 基于创新群体培育评价的创新研究群体基金资助成效分析[J]. 中国科学基金, 2015,29(2):99-107
[3] 蔡晖,马信,李晓强,等. 北京大学创新研究群体建设成效及管理思考[J]. 中国科学基金, 2011, 25(1):50-54
[4] 毕建新,郑建明,杨永华. 创新研究群体形成规律研究——基于国家自然科学基金创新研究群体项目的实证分析[J]. 科技管理研究, 2015,35(10):175-180
[5] 戚湧,丁刚,赵宏. 创新群体合作研发绩效的制度分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2011,32(10):165-172
[6] 丁云龙. 大学科技园的网络本质和战略选择[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2004,20(5):62-66
[7] 刘璇,李嘉,陈智高,等. 科研创新网络中知识扩散演化机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2015,36(7):19-27
[8] 高振明,庄新田,黄玮强. 社会网络视角下的并购企业文化整合研究[J]. 管理评论, 2016,28(9):218-227
[9] 林海芬,王涛. 惯例演化视角组织创新的实施机理研究——以天地华宇定日达创新为例[J]. 管理评论, 2017,29(1):250-264
[10] 袁康,汤超颖,李美智,等. 导师合著网络对博士生科研产出的影响[J]. 管理评论, 2016,28(9):228-237
[11] 晋琳琳. 高校科研团队知识管理系统要素研究——来自教育部创新团队的实证分析[J]. 管理评论, 2010,22(5):29-34
[12] 赵健宇,袭希,苏屹. 知识流动网络演化中小世界效应的仿真研究[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(5):70-81
[13] 宋晶,陈菊红,孙永磊. 网络能力与合作创新绩效的关系研究——文化异质性的作用[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(2):35-42
[14] Kuhn T. The Structure of Scientific Revolution[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1999
[15] 托马斯·库恩著, 金吾伦, 胡新和译. 科学革命的结构[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2012
[16] Hayek F. A. The Constitution of Liberty[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago, 1960
[17] 迈克尔·波兰尼著, 冯银江, 李雪茹译. 自由的逻辑[M]. 长春:吉林人民出版社, 2002
[18] 张钊. 哈耶克自生自发秩序的演化博弈论解释[D]. 西北大学硕士学位论文, 2009
[19] Witt U. The Hayekian Puzzle:Spontaneous Order and the Business Cycle[J]. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 2010,44(1):44-58
[20] Nolan M. C. Paul Sakmann's and Albert Schatz's Mandeville Studies:Their Link to Hayek's "Spontaneous Order" Theory[J]. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2016,38(4):485-506
[21] 王雅静. 秩序·自由·信仰——波兰尼论自发秩序[D]. 华东师范大学硕士学位论文, 2006
[22] Crane D. Social Structure in a Group of Scientists:A Test of the "Invisible College" Hypothesis[J]. American Sociological Review, 1969,34(3):335-352
[23] Crane D. Invisible Colleges:Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1973
[24] 丁云龙. 国外学术共同体学术研究体例述评[J]. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 2002,4(4):238-240
[25] Tuckman B. W. Developmental Sequence in Small Groups[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1965,63(63):384-399
[26] Katzenbach J. R., Smith D. K. The Wisdom of Teams:Creating the High-Performance Organization[M]. Boston:Harvard Business Press, 1993
[27] Greiner L. E. Evolution and Revolution as Organizations Grow[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1998,76(3):55-68
[28] Jida T. A Case Study of the Suitable Leadership Style According to the Project Team Life Cycle[J]. Journal of the Society of Project Management, 2006,8(6):23-28
[29] Oshri I., Kotlarsky J., Willcocks L. P. Before, During, and After Face-to-face Meetings:Lifecycle of Social Ties in Globally Distributed Teams[C]. International Conference on Information Systems, 2005
[30] 孙崇正,张亚红. 大学科研创新团队成长演化模型研究[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2011,11(1):78-82
[31] 危怀安,胡艳辉. 自主创新能力演化中的科研团队作用机理——基于SKL科研团队生命周期的视角[J]. 科学学研究, 2012,30(1):94-101
[32] 国家自然科学基金委员会计划局. 创新研究群体科学基金实施效果分析与发展战略研究研究报告[R]. 国家自然科学基金委, 2014
[33] D·普赖斯. 宋剑耕, 戴振飞译. 大科学小科学[M]. 北京:世界科学出版社, 1982
[34] Price D. J., Beaver D. Collaboration in an Invisible College[J]. American Psychologist, 1966,21(11):1011-1018
[35] Gherardini A., Nucciotti A. Yesterday's Giants and Invisible Colleges of Today:A Study on the "Knowledge Transfer" Scientific Domain[J]. Scientometrics, 2017,112(4):1-17
[36] Hotson H. Highways of Light to the Invisible College:Linking Data on Seventeenth-century Intellectual Diasporas[J]. Intellectual History Review, 2016,26(1):71-80
[37] 国家自然科学基金委. 国家自然科学基金2015年度绩效报告[R]. 国家自然科学基金委, 2016
[38] Eisenhardt K. M. Building Theories from Case Study Research[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1989,14(4):532-550
[39] Chen C. CiteSpace Ⅱ:Detecting and Visualizing Emerging Trends and Transient Patterns in Scientific Literature[J]. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 2006,57(3):359-377
[40] 李杰,陈超美. Citespace:科技文本挖掘及可视化[M]. 北京:首都经济贸易大学出版社, 2016
[41] 杨卫,郑永和,董超. 如何评审具有颠覆性创新的基础研究[J]. 中国科学基金, 2017,31(4):313-315