Core Safety Risk Management in Urban Underground Engineering:Structure Optimization and Alliance Strategies

Abstract

Abstract:

The major safety accidents within the construction of urban underground engineering great have brought losses to the social and economic development. It is urgent to effectively control the core security risks of major safety accidents in urban underground engineering. The structure of the collaborative governance of the core safety risks in urban underground engineering has the characteristics of social network. Therefore, this paper uses the social network analysis method to illustrate the structure of the collaborative governance. The results show that the owner, the contractor, the insurer and the third party risk management institution are the core stakeholders in the social network, but it is hard to govern them synergistically. Furthermore, the optimization of network structure is carried out, and the results show that the contractor-contractor-insurer alliance forms a relatively optimal collaborative governance structure. The research has important value for reducing the governance risk of stakeholders, and improving the success rate of core security risk coordination governance.

Key words: urban underground engineering, core safety risks, risk governance, social network analysis (SNA), structure optimization

Xu Shusheng, Chen Wenqiang, Deng Jiaojiao. Core Safety Risk Management in Urban Underground Engineering:Structure Optimization and Alliance Strategies[J]. , 2017, 29(11): 240-250,260.

References

[1] 李微, 陈志龙, 郭东军. 国外城市地下空间规划借鉴——以赫尔辛基为例[J]. 国际城市规划, 2016,31(3):119-124
[2] Zhang L. M., Skibniewski M. J., Wu X. J., et al. A Probabilistic Approach for Safety Risk Analysis in Metro Construction[J]. Safety Science, 2014,63:8-17
[3] Gao J. P., Xu Z. S., Liu D. L., et al. Application of the Model Based on Fuzzy Consistent Matrix and AHP in the Assessment of Fire Risk of Subway Tunnel[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2014,71:591-596
[4] Pryke S. D. Analysing Construction Project Coalitions:Exploring the Application of Social Network Analysis[J]. Construction Management & Economics, 2004,22(8):787-797
[5] 盛昭瀚,丁峰. 大型工程综合集成管理:苏通大桥工程管理理论的探索与思考[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2009
[6] Sousa R. L., Einstein H. H. Risk Analysis During Tunnel Construction Using Bayesian Networks:Porto Metro Case Study[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2012,27:86-100
[7] Ding L. Y., Zhang L. M., Wu. X. G., et al. Safety Management in Tunnel Construction:Case Study of Wuhan Metro Construction in China[J]. Safety Science, 2014,62:8-15
[8] Alfredo D. C., M. Pilar D. L. C. Integrated Methodology for Project Risk Management[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2002,128(6):473-485
[9] Loosemore M. Construction Crises as Periods of Social Adjustment[J]. Journal of Management in Engineering, 1997,13(4):30-37
[10] Pryke S. D. Towards a Social Network Theory of Project Governance[J]. Construction Management & Economics, 2005,23(9):927-939
[11] Chinowsky P., Diekmann J., Galotti V. Social Network Model of Construction[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 2008,134(10):53-70
[12] Ning Y. Quantitative Effects of Drivers and Barriers on Networking Strategies in Public Construction Projects[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2014,32(2):286-297
[13] 丁荣贵,刘芳,孙涛等. 基于社会网络分析的项目治理研究——以大型建设监理项目为例[J]. 中国软科学, 2010,(6):132-140
[14] 李永奎,乐云,何清华,等. 大型复杂项目组织网络模型及实证分析[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2011,39(6):930-934
[15] 乐云,张兵,关贤军,等. 基于SNA视角的政府投资项目合谋关系研究[J]. 公共管理学报, 2013, 10(3):29-40
[16] 侯俊东,肖仁彬. 地质灾害防治项目治理的社会网络结构优化及策略[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(2):252-252
[17] Rousseau D. M., Sitkin S. B., Burt R S, et al. Not So Different After All:A Cross-Discipline View of Trust[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1998,23(3):393-404
[18] 李淼. 生产企业与中间商关系强度对出口绩效影响的实证研究[D]. 中南大学硕士学位论文, 2008
[19] 陆晓春. 基于项目治理的代建项目成功因素研究[D]. 天津大学博士学位论文, 2008
[20] 陈帆. 基于契约关系的PPP项目治理机制研究[D]. 中南大学博士学位论文, 2010
[21] 王润稼. 论诸利益相关者的优先性排序[J]. 郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015,48(2):37-40
[22] 魏纪泳. 多元利益主体共同治理机制研究[D]. 中国科学技术大学博士学位论文, 2006
[23] Fynes B., Voss C., Burca S. The Impact of Supply Chain Relationship Quality on Quality Performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 2005,96(3):339-354
[24] 潘松挺,蔡宁. 企业创新网络中关系强度的测量研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2010,(5):108-115
[25] 潘松挺,蔡宁. 网络关系强度与组织学习:环境动态性的调节作用[J]. 科学决策, 2010,(4):48-54
[26] 任树本,包锡盛,刘世虎. 工程保险建设项目的风险保障——英国工程保险制度借鉴[J]. 中国投资, 2002,(7):78-80
[27] 秦玉芳,彭鹏举,刘新社. 我国建筑市场发展工程保险经纪人初探[J]. 建筑经济, 1999,(3):14-16
[28] 李纲,任佳佳,毛进,等. 专利权人合作网络的社群结构分析——以燃料电池电动汽车专利为例[J]. 情报学报, 2014,33(3):267-276
[29] 段运峰,李永奎,乐云,等. 复杂重大工程共同体的社会结构、网络关系及治理研究评述[J]. 建筑经济, 2012,(10):79-82
[30] Lehtiranta L. Collaborative Risk Management Processes:A Constructive Case Study[J]. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 2013,3(4):198-212
[31] Loosemore M, Cheung E. Implementing Systems Thinking to Manage Risk in Public Private Partnership Projects[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2015,33(6):1325-1334