基于资源依赖观的合作双元能力对联盟创新绩效的影响研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

随着知识经济时代全球化竞争的愈发加剧，越来越多的公司通过组建战略联盟来进行合作创新。基于双元理论，伙伴双方同等重视利用学习和探索学习对于联盟创新成功至关重要；而资源依赖观则认为，成员间以及外部资源供给的状况对于联盟创新成功非常关键。通过整合这两个理论视角，基于148家战略联盟样本，本文发现：战略联盟的关系资源依赖（资源互补）和外部资源依赖（政府支持和竞争强度）在伙伴间合作双元能力与联盟创新绩效之间扮演调节变量的角色。

关键词: 合作双元能力, 资源依赖, 创新绩效, 战略联盟

Abstract:

With global competition becoming more intense, an increasing number of firms have conducted their innovation activities through strategic alliances. One stream of literature, from the ambidexterity view, has underscored the key role of paying equal attention to exploitative competency and exploratory competency, whereas another one, from resource dependency perspective has concentrated on the essential role of resource availability. Our analysis of 148 equity-based strategic alliances demonstrates that, resource availability (i.e., partner resource complementarity, government support, and competitive intensity) plays a moderating effect on the direct effect of ambidexterity competency on alliance innovation performance.

Key words: cooperative ambidexterity competency, resource dependency, innovation performance, strategic alliance

孙彪. 基于资源依赖观的合作双元能力对联盟创新绩效的影响研究[J]. , 2017, 29(11): 98-105.

Sun Biao. The Effects of Cooperative Ambidexterity Competency on Alliance Innovation Performance: A Resource-dependency Perspective[J]. , 2017, 29(11): 98-105.

参考文献

[1] Fang E. The Effect of Strategic Alliance Knowledge Complementarity on New Product Innovativeness in China[J]. Organization Science, 2011,22(1):158-172
[2] March J. G. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning[J]. Organization Science, 1991,2(1):71-87
[3] 张建宇. 企业探索性创新与开发性创新的资源基础及其匹配性研究[J]. 管理评论, 2014,26(11):88-98
[4] Parmigiani A., Rivera-Santos M. Clearing a Path Through the Forest:A Meta-Review of Interorganizational Relationships[J]. Journal of Management, 2011,37(4):1108-1136
[5] Patel P., Terjesen S., Li D. Enhancing Effects of Manufacturing Flexibility through Operational Absorptive Capacity and Operational Ambidexterity[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2012,30(3):202-220
[6] Im G., Rai A. IT-enabled Coordination for Ambidextrous Interorganizational Relationships[J]. Information Systems Research, 2014,25(1):72-92
[7] Cao Q., Gedajlovic E., Zhang H. Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity:Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects[J].Organization Science, 2009,20(4):781-796
[8] Lin, Z., Peng M. W., Yang H., et al. How Do Networks and Learning Drive M&As? An Institutional Comparison Between China and the United States[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2009,30(1):1113-1132
[9] 马迎贤. 组织间关系:资源依赖视角的研究综述[J]. 管理评论, 2005,17(2):55-62
[10] Kraaijenbrink J., Spender J., Groen A. The Resource-Based View:A Review and Assessment of Its Critiques[J]. Journal of Management, 2010,36(1):349-372
[11] Xie E., Peng M W., Zhao W. Uncertainties, Resources, and Supplier Selection in An Emerging Economy[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2013,30(4):1219-1242
[12] Li Y., Su Z., Liu Y. Can Strategic Flexibility Help Firms Profit from Product Innovation[J]. Technovation, 2010,30(1):300-309
[13] Li Y., Huang J. Ambidexterity's Mediating Impact on Product Development Proficiency and New Product Performance[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2012,41(7):1125-1132
[14] He Z. L., Wong P. K. Exploration vs. Exploitation:An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis[J]. Organization Science, 2004,15(4):481-494
[15] Gupta A.K., Smith K. G., Shalley C. E. The Interplay between Exploration and Expoitation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006,49(4):693-706
[16] 纪雪洪,陈志祥,孙道银. 供应商参与、专用性投资与新产品开发绩效关系研究[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(3):96-104
[17] Lavie D., Rosenkopf L. Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006,49(4):797-818
[18] Lambe C. J., Spekman R. E., Hunt S. D. Alliance Competence, Resources, and Alliance Success:Conceptualization, Measurement, and Initial Test[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2002,30(2):141-158
[19] Fortune A., Mitchell W. Unpacking Firm Exit at the Firm and Industry Levels:The Aadaptation and Selection of Firm Capabilities[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2012,33(7):794-819
[20] Harrison J. S., Hitt M. A., Hoskisson R., et al. Resource Complementarity in Business Combination:Extending the Logic to Organizational Alliances[J]. Journal of Management, 2001,27:679-690
[21] Cai S., Jun M., Yang, Z. Implementing Supply Chain Information Integration in China:The Role of Institutional Forces and Trust[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2010,28(3):257-268
[22] Luk C., Yau O., Sin L., etc. The Effects of Social Capital and Organizational Innovativeness in Different Institutional Contexts[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2008,39(4):589-612
[23] Auh S., Menguc B. Balancing Exploration and Exploitation:The Moderating Role of Competitive Intensity[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2005,58(12):1652-1661
[24] Peng M. W. Institutional Transitions and Strategic Choices[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2003,28(2):275-286
[25] Pavlou P. A., El Sawy O A. Understanding The Elusive Black Box of Dynamic Capabilities[J]. Decision Sciences, 2011,42(1):239-273
[26] Aiken L. S., West S. G. Multiple Regression:Testing and Interpreting Interactions[M]. Newbury Park, CA:Sage, 1991
[27] 谢永平,孙永磊,张浩淼. 资源依赖、关系治理与技术创新网络企业核心影响力形成[J]. 管理评论, 2014,26(8):117-126