我国工业化与城镇化的环境经济集聚双门槛效应分析

›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (10): 21-33.

我国工业化与城镇化的环境经济集聚双门槛效应分析

刘满凤¹, 谢晗进²

1. 江西财经大学协同创新中心, 南昌 330013;
2. 华东交通大学经济管理学院, 南昌 330013

收稿日期:2017-02-20 出版日期:2017-10-28 发布日期:2017-11-01
作者简介:刘满凤,江西财经大学信息管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士;谢晗进,华东交通大学经济管理学院助教,博士
基金资助:
国家社科基金重大招标项目（15ZDC021）；国家自然科学基金项目（71263020）；江西省科技落地计划项目（KJLD12064）；江西省高校哲学社会科学重大招标项目（ZDGG201305）。

Analysis of the Double Threshold Effect of Industrialization and Urbanization in the Proceed of Environment Economic Aggregation

Liu Manfeng¹, Xie Hanjin²

1. Collaborative Innovation Center, Jiangxi University of Finance & Economics, Nanchang 330013;
2. School of Economics and Management, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013

Received:2017-02-20 Online:2017-10-28 Published:2017-11-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文通过建立工业化与城镇化双门槛效应模型，以及对环境经济集聚的空间效应分析，验证了经济集聚与污染集聚之间表现为"N型"环境库兹涅茨曲线，且工业化与城镇化存在双门槛效应。当工业化率介于41.76%与44.89%之间或城镇化率高于88.50%，经济集聚产生的负面效应最小，EKC曲线中改善的"拐点"值最小，恶化的"拐点"值最大，即经济发展可以迅速跨过越发展越污染的拐点，进入再发展少污染的轨道，并推迟下一个拐点的到来。在分析"十二五"时期各省市工业化与城镇化发展现状和"拐点"特征基础上，提出"十三五"时期各省市经济与环境协调发展的对策建议，即优先推进江浙沪的协同发展；以北京和天津为引领推动京津冀一体化发展；在泛珠三角区域合作大背景下推进广东与福建的协同发展，深化闽粤经济合作；依托环渤海与京津冀经济圈的区位优势实现山东与辽宁的协调发展，以此重点突破东北困境。

关键词: 城镇化水平, 工业化水平, 门槛效应, 空间效应

Abstract:

In this paper, through establishing the threshold effect model of industrialization and urbanization and analyzing the spatial effect of environment economic aggregating, the "N-shaped" Environment Kuznets Curve between economic agglomeration and pollution agglomeration is verified, and the double threshold effect existing between industrialization and urbanization is also found. When the industrialization rate is between 41.67% and 44.89% or urbanization rate is above 88.50%, the economic agglomeration causes the lowest negative effect, the improving "turning point" is smaller and the deteriorating "turning point" is bigger in Environment Kuznets Curve. It means that economic development can quickly step over the "turning point" of the stage where faster development produces more pollution and step into a stage where faster development produces less pollution, thus putting off the arrival of next "turning point". By analyzing each province's current situation, future trend and characteristics of "turning point" between industrialization and urbanization in the "12th Five-year Plan" period, this paper offers some corresponding suggestions for each province to harmonize economic development and environmental pollution in the "13th Five-year Plan" period. To be specific, it is advised to prioritize the coordinated development of Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shanghai, take the regional advantage of Beijing and Tianjin to drive the integrative development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei economic zone, promote the collaborative development of Guangdong and Fujian and deepen their cooperation as a part of the broader cooperation in Pan-Pearl River Delta region, and rely on the location advantage of Circum-Bohai Sea economic zone and Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei economic zone to realize the harmonious development of Shandong and Liaoning and break through the development bottleneck of Northeastern China.

Key words: industrialization, urbanization, threshold effect, spatial effect

刘满凤, 谢晗进. 我国工业化与城镇化的环境经济集聚双门槛效应分析[J]. , 2017, 29(10): 21-33.

Liu Manfeng, Xie Hanjin. Analysis of the Double Threshold Effect of Industrialization and Urbanization in the Proceed of Environment Economic Aggregation[J]. , 2017, 29(10): 21-33.

参考文献

[1] 何雄浪,李国平. 专业化产业集聚、空间成本与区域工业化[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2007,6(4):1021-1040
[2] 曾煜,陈方亮. 论产业聚集与我国城镇化建设[J]. 江西社会科学, 2004,24(7):106-110
[3] Grossman G. M., Krueger A. B. Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 1992,8(2):223-250
[4] Panayotou T. Empirical Tests and Policy Analysis of Environmental Degradation at Different Stages of Economic Development[A]. Geneva, Switzerland:International Labor Office, 1993
[5] Holtz-Eakin, Douglas & Selden, Thomas M. Stoking the Fires? CO₂ Emissions and Economic Growth[J]. Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, 1995,57(1):85-101
[6] Dinda S., Coondoo D., Pal M. Air Quality and Economic Growth:An Empirical Study[J]. Ecological Economics, 2000,34(3):409-423
[7] Firiedl B., Getzner M. Determinants of CO₂ Emissions in a Small Open Economy[J]. Ecological Economics, 2003,45(1):133-148
[8] 邢秀凤,刘颖宇. 山东省经济发展与环境保护关系的计量分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2006,16(1):58-61
[9] Arrow et al. Economic Growth Carrying Capacity and the Environment[J]. Science, 1995,268(5210):520-521
[10] 蒋萍,余厚强. EKC拐点类型、形成过程及影响因素[J]. 财经问题研究, 2010,319(6):3-9
[11] 周国富,李时兴. 偏好、技术与环境质量——环境库兹涅茨曲线的形成机制与实证检验[J]. 南方经济, 2012,30(6):85-95
[12] 林伯强,蒋竺均. 中国二氧化碳的环境库兹涅茨曲线预测及影响因素分析[J]. 管理世界, 2009,(4):27-36
[13] 邓晓兰,鄢哲明,武永义. 碳排放与经济发展服从倒U型曲线关系吗——对环境库兹涅茨曲线假说的重新解读[J]. 财贸经济, 2014,387(2):19-29
[14] 王铭利. 基于联立方程与状态空间模型对中国经济增长与环境污染关系的研究[J]. 管理评论, 2016,28(7):75-84
[15] 范丹. 中国二氧化碳EKC曲线扩展模型的空间计量分析[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2014,186(5):83-91
[16] Hansen B. E. Threshold Effects in Non-dynamic Panels:Estimation, Testing, and Inference[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1999,93(2):345-368
[17] 鲁钊阳,廖杉杉. FDI技术溢出与区域创新能力差异的双门槛效应[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2012,29(5):75-88
[18] 李梅,柳士昌. 对外直接投资逆向技术溢出的地区差异和门槛效应——基于中国省际面板数据的门槛回归分析[J]. 管理世界, 2012,(1):21-32
[19] 李子豪,刘辉煌. 外商直接投资的环境门槛效应研究——中国省级数据的检验[J]. 管理评论, 2013,25(9):108-116
[20] 谢杰. 工业化、城镇化在农业现代化进程中的门槛效应研究[J]. 农业经济问题, 2012,388(4):84-90
[21] 黄庆华,姜松. 城镇化、门槛效应与房地产价格变动[J]. 财经问题研究, 2014,372(11):99-106
[22] 曹孜,陈洪波. 城市化和能源消费的门槛效应分析与预测[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015,25(11):59-68
[23] 李佳佳,罗能生. 城镇化进程对城市土地利用效率影响的双门槛效应分析[J]. 经济地理, 2015,35(7):156-162
[24] 李力,唐登莉,孔英,等. FDI对城市雾霾污染影响的空间计量研究——以珠三角地区为例[J]. 管理评论, 2016,28(6):11-24
[25] 赵增耀,夏斌. 市场潜能、地理溢出与工业集聚——基于非线性空间门槛效应的经验分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2012,296(11):71-83
[26] Lesage J. P., Pace R. K. Introduction to Spatial Econometrics[M]. Boca Raton:Taylor & Francis, 2009
[27] 叶明确,方莹. 出口与我国全要素生产率增长的关系——基于空间杜宾模型[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2013,365(5):19-31
[28] 李秋萍,李长建,肖小勇,等. 中国农业碳排放的空间效应研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2015,29(4):30-35
[29] 刘满凤,谢晗进. 中国省域经济集聚性与污染集聚性趋同研究[J]. 经济地理, 2014,34(4):25-32
[30] 张军,吴桂英,张吉鹏. 中国生机物质资本存量估算:1952-2000[J]. 经济研究, 2004,39(10):35-44
[31] 陶长琪,齐亚伟. 中国全要素生产率的空间差异及其成因分析[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2010,27(1):19-32