›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (10): 9-20.

• 经济与金融管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

存款保险限额研究——银行风险承担视角

赵尚梅, 刘娜, 贺江, 常一鸣   

  1. 北京航空航天大学经济管理学院, 北京 100191
  • 收稿日期:2015-10-07 出版日期:2017-10-28 发布日期:2017-11-01
  • 通讯作者: 常一鸣(通讯作者),北京航空航天大学经济管理学院博士研究生
  • 作者简介:赵尚梅,北京航空航天大学经济管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士;刘娜,北京航空航天大学经济管理学院博士研究生;贺江,北京航空航天大学经济管理学院博士研究生
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金面上项目(71373017;70973007)。

Study on Deposit Insurance Coverage Limit for Bank Risk-taking Minimization

Zhao Shangmei, Liu Na, He Jiang, Chang Yiming   

  1. School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing 100191
  • Received:2015-10-07 Online:2017-10-28 Published:2017-11-01

摘要:

本文基于银行风险承担最小化视角,研究了显性存款保险限额的确定。结果表明,样本国家的银行风险承担与显性存款保险限额之间呈现出U型关系;当居民储蓄率较高或者银行存贷利差较低时,这种关系更加明显。进一步分析发现,实际存款保险限额偏离银行风险承担最小的保险限额越大,银行风险承担越高。中国已经实施的50万元人民币存款保险限额,高于银行风险承担最小时模型估计的29万元人民币保险限额,会增加银行的风险承担激励。

关键词: 存款保险限额, 银行风险承担, 居民储蓄率, 存贷利差

Abstract:

From the perspective of minimizing bank risk-taking, this paper studies the determination of explicit deposit insurance coverage limits. The results show that there is a U-shaped relationship between bank risk-taking and coverage limit and the relationship will be more pronounced in countries with higher household saving rate or lower interest spreads. Further analysis shows that the bank risk-taking is higher when the deviation between actual coverage limits and bank risk-minimizing ones is higher. China has a RMB 500,000 limit which is higher than the RMB 290,000 limit that the model predicts and is bad for the bank risk-taking.

Key words: coverage limit, bank risk-taking, household saving rate, interest spreads