养老保障政策价值传导及其影响机制研究——基于湖北省民营企业的证据

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在对湖北省15家民营企业调查的基础上，构建了养老保障政策价值的内部传导及对养老生活支持感的影响机制模型，深入探讨了养老保障政策对养老生活的支持作用。实证分析结果表明，一方面养老保障政策的不同价值特性对养老生活支持感的作用不同，其中适当性与充分性和回应性正向关联，共享性对效益性和充分性、公平性和回应性均有积极作用。表明养老公平、缴费合理、服务同质是政府、企业和个人三方的共同责任，同时也需要公平公正、可持续发展的养老保障制度确保其有效实现。另一方面养老保障政策的充分性、公平性和回应性对民营企业职工的养老生活支持感具有显著的积极作用，在提高民营企业职工的养老生活支持感上，充分性比效益性作用更显著，公平性与回应性作用差异不大。表明养老保障在兼顾政策内容全面性的基础上，应重点突出政策目标和关键内容，满足职工主要养老诉求，充分发挥政策价值的保障作用，着力提升企业职工的养老生活水平。

关键词: 养老保障, 政策价值, 民营企业, 传导机制, 生活支持感

Abstract: How to effectively develop the value of pension security policy on the retirement life support has received great attention in a long time. Based on the survey from 15 private firms in Hubei province, a model of the transmission and impact of pension security policy values on the retirement life support is presented. Their impacts are also empirically compared. The results show that the appropriateness of pension security policy is positively correlated with sufficiency and responsiveness. The sharing of pension security policy has positive impact on benefit, sufficiency, fairness and responsiveness. This suggests reasonable basic pension security systems are the premise of pension treatment, pension fairness and service homogeneity, which are the common responsibilities of the government, firms and individuals as well. In addition, the sufficiency, fairness and responsiveness of pension security policy have positive impact on retirement life support perceived by employees in private firms. However, the sufficiency of pension security policy plays a more important role than benefit in the retirement life support perceived by employees in private firms, whereas the fairness and responsiveness are perceived to have similar effects. Not only should pension security give consideration to the comprehensiveness, but also focus on the targets and key points, in order to satisfy the requirements of employees, effectively develop the values of pension security policy and ensure the high level of retirement life of employees in private firms.

Key words: pension security, policy value, internal transmission, private firm, perceived life support

李素利, 白延涛. 养老保障政策价值传导及其影响机制研究——基于湖北省民营企业的证据[J]. , 2017, 29(3): 207-218.

Li Suli, Bai Yantao. The Transmission and Impact of Pension Security Policy Values——Evidence from Private Firms in Hubei Province[J]. , 2017, 29(3): 207-218.

参考文献

[1] 郑功成. 中国社会保障改革与发展战略:理念,目标与行动方案[M]. 北京:人民出版社, 2008
[2] Gustman A. L., Steinmeier T. L. Policy Effects in Hyperbolic vs Exponential Models of Consumption and Retirement[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2012,96(5):465-473
[3] Bozeman B., Sarewitz D. Public Value Mapping and Science Policy Evaluation[J]. Minerva, 2011,49(1):1-23
[4] González Alegre J. An Evaluation of EU Regional Policy:Do Structural Actions Crowd out Public Spending?[J]. Public Choice, 2011:1-21
[5] Selden M. L. The Reform of Social Welfare in China[J]. World Development, 1997,25(10):1657-1668
[6] Taylor-Gooby P. The Silver Age of the Welfare State:Perspectives on Resilience[J]. Journal of Social Policy, 2002,31(4):597-621
[7] DiNapoli T. P. Retirement Security for Americans and the Role of Defined-Benefit Pension Plans[J]. Public Administration Review, 2012,21(6):166-181
[8] Béland D.,Yu K. M. A Long Financial March: Pension Reform in China[J]. Journal of Social Policy, 2004,33(2):267-288
[9] Dolan P., White M. P. How Can Measures of Subjective Well-being be Used to Inform Public Policy?[J]. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2007,2(1):71-85
[10] Soares J. Social Security Evaluation: A Critique[J]. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 2005,9(1):57-97
[11] Lee R., Mason A. The Price of Maturity:Aging Populations Mean Countries Have to Find New Ways to Support Their Elderly[J]. Finance & Developmen, 2011,48(2):6-16
[12] Kim E. H. Public Support, Family Support,and Life Satisfaction of the Elderly: Evidence from a New Government Old-Age Pension in Korea[M]. Durham, Carolina: Duke University Press, 2012
[13] Golden J., Conroy R. M., Bruce I., et al. Loneliness, Social Support Networks, Mood and Wellbeing in Community-dwelling Elderly[J]. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2009,24(7):694-700
[14] Bozo Ö., Toksabay N. E., Kürüm O. Activities of Daily Living,Depression,and Social Support Among Elderly Turkish People[J]. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 2009,143(2):193-206
[15] Shi S. J. Left to Market and Family-again? Ideas and the Development of the Rural Pension Policy in China[J]. Social Policy & Administration, 2006,40(7):791-806
[16] Leung A. S. M., Cheung Y. H., Liu X. The Relations between Life Domain Satisfaction and Subjective Well -being[J]. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2011,26(2):155-169
[17] Dunn W. N. Public Policy Analysis: An introduction[M]. Beijing:The Chinese People's Publishing Press, 2003
[18] Mesa-Lago C. Social Security in Latin America: Pension and Health Care Reforms in the Last Quarter Century[Z]. JSTOR, 2007,42(2):181-201
[19] Wentworth D. N., Neaton J. D., Rasmussen W. L. An Evaluation of the Social Security Administration Master Beneficiary Record File and the National Death Index in the Ascertainment of Vital Status.[J]. American Journal of Public Health, 1983,73(11):1270-1274
[20] 貟杰,杨诚虎. 公共政策评估:理论与方法[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社, 2006
[21] Chalise H. N., Saito T., Takahashi M., et al. Relationship Specialization Amongst Sources and Receivers of Social Support and its Correlations with Loneliness and Subjective Well-being: A Cross Sectional Study of Nepalese Older Adults[J]. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 2007,44(3):299-314
[22] 陈功. 我国养老方式硏究[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2003
[23] Miklos-Thal J., Zhang J. J. Marketing to Manage Consumer Quality Inferences[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2013,50(1):55-69
[24] Cai F., Giles J., O'Keefe P., et al. The Elderly and Old Age Support in Rural China[M]. Washington,World Bank Publications, 2012
[25] Laffin M. A New Politica of Governance or an Old Politics of Central Local Relations? Labour's Reform of Social Housing Tenancies in England [J]. Public Administration,2013,91(1SI):195-210
[26] Lee S., Whitford A. B. Assessing the Effects of Organizational Resources on Public Agency Performance: Evidence from the US Federal Government[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research And Theory, 2013,23(3):687-712
[27] Steiner B. H. Policy Organization in American Security Affairs:An assesment[J]. Public Administration Review, 1977,37(4):357-371
[28] Andr M. Institutional Choice and the Diffusion of Policy Paradigms: Brazil and the Second Wave of Pension Reform[J]. International Political Science Review, 2004,25(3):320-341
[29] Arza C. The Politics of Counter-reform in the Argentine Pension System: Actors, Political Discourse, and Policy Performance[J]. International Journal of Social Welfare, 2012,21(s1):77-82
[30] Lavertu S., Moynihan D. P. Agency Political Ideology and Reform Implementation: Performance Management in the Bush Administration[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research And Theory, 2013,23(3):521-549
[31] Emms P. Lifetime Investment and Consumption Using a Defined-contribution Pension Scheme[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2012,36(9):1303-1321
[32] Nielsen I., Smyth R., Liu Y. The Moderating Effects of Demographic Factors and Hukou Status on the Job Satisfaction-subjective Well-being Relationship in Urban China[J]. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2011,22(6):1333-1350
[33] Wills-Herrera E., Islam G., Hamilton M. Subjective Well-being in Cities: A Multidimensional Concept of Individual, Social and Cultural Variables[J]. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2009,4(2):201-221
[34] Dolan P., Metcalfe R. Valuing Health A Brief Report on Subjective Well-being Versus Preferences[J]. Medical Decision Making, 2012,32(4):578-582
[35] Gomez V., Allemand M., Grob A. Neuroticism, Extraversion, Goals, and Subjective Well-being: Exploring the Relations in Young, Middle-aged, and Older Adults[J]. Journal of Research in Personality, 2012,46(3):317-325
[36] Gannon N., Ranzijn R. Does Emotional Intelligence Predict Unique Variance in Life Satisfaction Beyond IQ and Personality?[J]. Personality and Individual Differences, 2005,38(6):1353-1364
[37] Bartels K. P. R., Cozzi G., Mantovan N. "The Big Society," Public Expenditure, and Volunteering[J]. Public Administration Review, 2013,73(2):340-351
[38] Lindell M. K., Whitney D. J. Accounting for Common Method Variance in Cross-sectional Research Designs[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001,86(1):114-120
[39] Malhotra N. K., Kim S. S., Patil A. Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research[J]. Management Science, 2006,52(12):1865-1883
[40] Birkland T. A. An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories,Concepts,and Models of Public Policy Making[M]. New York: ME Sharpe, 2010
[41] Jupe R. Evolutionary Change? An Evaluation of the McNulty Report on Rail[J]. Public Money & Management, 2012,32(3):177-184
[42] Meneguello R. Government Popularity and Public Attitudes to Social Security Reform in Brazil[J]. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2005,17(2):173-189
[43] Quadagno J., Pederson J. E. Has Support for Social Security Declined? Attitudes toward the Public Pension Scheme in the USA, 2000 and 2010[J]. International Journal of Social Welfare, 2012,21(S1):88-100
[44] Van Vliet O., Been J., Caminada K., et al. Pension Reform and Income Inequality among Older People in 15 European Countries[J]. International Journal of Social Welfare, 2012,21(S1):8-29
[45] Zimet G. D., Dahlem N. W., Zimet S. G., et al. The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support[J]. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1988,52(1):30-41
[46] Petter S., Straub D., Rai A. Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2007,31(4):623-656
[47] Chin W. W. The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling[J]. Modern Methods for Business Research, 1998,16(2):74-81
[48] Gefen D., Straub D. A Practical Guide to Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and Annotated Example[J]. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2005,16(1):109-114
[49] 杜澄. 关于当前我国开展政策评价的总体思考与建设[J]. 管理评论, 2004,16(10):5-57
[50] 吴迪,高鹏,董纪昌. 保障性住房违规出租问题的博弈分析和治理研究[J]. 管理评论, 2011,23(2):3-10
[51] 李素利,张金隆,刘汕. 多维多层视角下我国社会保障政策执行效果测度研究[J].管理评论, 2015,27(3):24-38
[52] 李素利,白延涛. 政府农村养老保障服务能力对服务质量的影响研究[J]. 公共管理学报, 2016,13(4):65-76