›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 90-109.

• 组织与战略管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

制度逻辑研究的文献计量分析

杨书燕1,2, 吴小节1, 汪秀琼3   

  1. 1. 广东工业大学管理学院, 广州 510520;
    2. 华南理工大学工商管理学院, 广州 510640;
    3. 华南理工大学经济与贸易学院, 广州 510006
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-25 出版日期:2017-03-28 发布日期:2017-03-30
  • 通讯作者: 吴小节,广东工业大学管理学院副教授,系主任,硕士生导师,博士
  • 作者简介:杨书燕,广东工业大学管理学院,硕士,华南理工大学工商管理学院博士研究生;汪秀琼,华南理工大学经济与贸易学院副教授,博士。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(15JZD020);国家自然科学基金项目(71102052;71402055);国家社会科学基金重点项目(15AGL003);教育部人文社会科学基金项目(14JCZH142;15YJAZH083);广东省高等学校优秀青年教师培养计划项目(YQ2015060);广东省教育厅人文社科项目(2012WYM_0010;2013WYXM0032)。

A Bibliometric Analysis of Institutional Logics Researches

Yang Shuyan1,2, Wu Xiaojie1, Wang Xiuqiong3   

  1. 1. School of Management, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520;
    2. School of Business Administration, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640;
    3. School of Economics and Commerce, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006
  • Received:2015-12-25 Online:2017-03-28 Published:2017-03-30

摘要: 以Web of Science数据库收录的制度逻辑文献为研究对象,采用文献计量方法对制度逻辑研究的文献外部特征和学科知识结构及其研究热点与趋势进行分析。研究发现:第一,制度逻辑研究领域的学科知识结构由6个部分构成:竞争逻辑、制度变迁与组织实践;制度与组织关系研究;多重制度环境、混合型组织和制度创业;多重制度逻辑、竞争逻辑与组织战略反应;制度化、制度理论与制度变迁;组织合法性、组织场域与战略反应。第二,制度逻辑研究热点趋势主要包括竞争逻辑下的组织战略反应、制度创业与合法性、新兴经济体国家的制度逻辑与组织战略反应以及不同层次政府制度逻辑对组织影响等4大主题类团。最后,提出制度逻辑可拓展的研究领域和研究方法,以期为制度逻辑学术研究和管理实践提供参考。

关键词: 制度逻辑, 制度理论, 制度复杂性, 战略反应, 制度创业, 组织场域, 合法性, 文献计量分析

Abstract: This paper uses bibliometric analysis method to investigate the external features, scientific knowledge structure, hotspots and trends of institutional logics field based on Web of Science database from its launch in 1998 to 2015, and obtains the following results: First, the scientific knowledge structure of institutional logics research field consists of six parts: competing logics, institutional change and organizational practice; the relationship between institutions and organizations; multiple institutional environments, hybrid organizations and institutional entrepreneurship; multiple institutional logics, competing logics and organizational strategic response; institutionalization, institutional theory and institutional change; organizational legitimacy, organizational field and strategic response. Second, the hotspots and trends of institutional logics researches are composed of four types of theme groups: organizational strategic response under competing logics; institutional entrepreneurship and legitimacy; institutional logics and organizational strategic response in emerging economies; influence of different levels of government institutional logics on organizations. Finally, some suggestions are put forward about the future academic research direction and management practice of institutional logics.

Key words: institutional logics, institutional theory, institutional complexity, strategic response, institutional entrepreneurship, organizational field, legitimacy, bibliometric analysis