中国创业板企业上市后业绩两极分化的原因探析

›› 2016, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 145-154.

中国创业板企业上市后业绩两极分化的原因探析

邢周凌¹, 张一弛², 王一鸣³

1. 北京大学金融创新与发展研究中心, 北京 100871;
2. 北京大学光华管理学院, 北京 100871;
3. 北京大学经济学院, 北京 100871

收稿日期:2014-03-12 出版日期:2016-04-28 发布日期:2016-05-16
作者简介:邢周凌,北京大学金融创新与发展研究中心研究员,硕士生导师,博士;张一弛,北京大学光华管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士;王一鸣,北京大学经济学院教授,博士生导师,博士。

The Reason Analysis of Performance Polarization of Chinese GEM (Growth Enterprise Market) Listed Companies after the Listing

Xing Zhouling¹, Zhang Yichi², Wang Yiming³

1. Research Center of Financial Innovation and Development of Peking University, Beijing 100871;
2. Guanghua Management School of Peking University, Beijing 100871;
3. Economics School of Peking University, Beijing 100871

Received:2014-03-12 Online:2016-04-28 Published:2016-05-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文以130家创业板上市企业为样本,探索了创业板企业上市后业绩两极分化之谜。研究发现:现阶段创业板上市企业中授权与激励机制是导致其上市后业绩两极分化的主要因素之一,当企业外部环境变化较快,在生产技术较复杂、技能要求较高的条件下,授权与激励机制越能激发员工的潜能与工作热情,从而促进企业绩效的提升。而当企业外部环境变化不快时,生产技术不复杂、需要技能不高时,授权与激励机制会增加企业的成本,从而会影响企业绩效下降。因此,当创业板上市企业金融资源达到一定程度时,要科学合理地进行资源配置和不断创新,才能保持高额利润。研究提出:企业有效地进行资源配置要求人力资源管理的目标指向不仅要与企业发展战略和系统间相契合,还要与企业外部的动态环境相契合,并形成一定的关系模式才能提高企业绩效。

关键词: 高绩效人力资源管理系统, 自主创新能力, 环境动态性, 企业绩效

Abstract:

This paper explores the mystery of performance polarization of 130 companies listed on GEM and finds that the polarization is caused mainly by authorization and incentives. When external environment changes rapidly, production technologies are complex and high skills are required, authorization and incentives can stimulate the potential and enthusiasm of staff, leading to a good corporate performance. When external environment does not change rapidly, production technologies are not complex and high skills are not required, authorization and incentives will increase enterprises' costs, leading to a poor corporate performance. Therefore, when the financial resources of GEM listed companies get to a certain level, they must allocate resources in a scientific and rational way and keep innovating in order to maintain high profits. To allocate effectively resources requires that human resource management should aim not only to keep development strategy in line with inter-enterprise systems, but also to match dynamic environment outside, forming a certain relationship model.

Key words: high-performance human resource management system, capacity of independent innovation, environment dynamic, enterprise performance

邢周凌, 张一弛, 王一鸣. 中国创业板企业上市后业绩两极分化的原因探析[J]. , 2016, 28(4): 145-154.

Xing Zhouling, Zhang Yichi, Wang Yiming. The Reason Analysis of Performance Polarization of Chinese GEM (Growth Enterprise Market) Listed Companies after the Listing[J]. , 2016, 28(4): 145-154.

参考文献

[1] 郎咸平,杨瑞辉,资本主义精神和社会主义改革[M]. 北京:东方出版社,2012
[2] Datta D. K., Guthrie J. P., Wright. P. M. HRM and Labor Productivity:Does Industry Matter?[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005,48(1):135-145
[3] Michael A. Sheppeck and Jack Militello. Strategic Configurational Performance[J]. Human Resource Management, Spring 2000,39(1):5-16
[4] 邢周凌. 高绩效人力资源管理系统与企业绩效研究[J]. 管理评论, 2012,24(7):91-98
[5] Combs J. A., Liu Y. M., Hall A. N., Ketchen D. A. How Much Do High-performance Work Practices Matter? A Meta-analysis of Their Effects on Organizational Performance[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2006,59(3):501-528
[6] Huselid M. A. The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity and Corporate Financial Performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1995,38(3):635-672
[7] Ichniowski C., Shaw K., Prennushi G. The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity:A Study of Steel Finishing Lines[J]. American Economic Review, 1997,87(3):291-313
[8] Takeuchi R., Lepak D. P., Wang H., Takeuchi K. An Empirical Examination of The Mechanisms Mediating Between High-performance Work Systems and the Performance of Japanese Organizations[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007,92(5):1069-1083
[9] 张正堂.战略人力资源管理研究——创造企业持续竞争优势[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,2012
[10] Wrihgt P. M., Gardner T. M., Moynihan L. M. The Impact of HR Practices on the Performance of Business Units[J]. Human Resource Management Joural, 2003,13(3):21-36
[11] Wright P. M., McCormick B., Sherman W. S. The Role of Human Resource Practices in Petro-chemical Refinery Performance[J]. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1999,10(3):551-571
[12] Youndt M. A., Snell S. A., Dean J. W. Human Resource Management, Manufacturing Strategy, and Firm Performance[J]. Academy of Management Jounral, 1996,39(4):836-866
[13] Chuang Chin-Hsun, Liao H., Strategic Human Resource Management in Service Context:Taking Care of Business by Taking Care of Employees and Customers[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2010,63(3):53-196
[14] Sanghamitra P., Sanyal K. C. Managing Human Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value:Role of HR Options[J]. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2011,22(3):1918-1941
[15] Phapruke U. Influences of Knowledge Acquisition and Information Richness on Firm Performance Via Technology Acceptance As a Moderator:Evidence from That E-Commerce Businesses[J]. Journal of Academy of Business and Economic, 2012,12(1):33-42
[16] Mohd R., Rosman M. Moderating Effects of Human Resource Management Practices and Entrepreneur Training on Innovation and Small-Medium Firm Performance[J]. Journal of Management and Strategy, 2013,4(2):60-69
[17] 邢周凌.中国创业板上市公司高绩效人力资源管理系统实证研究[J].管理评论, 2012,14(11):106-113
[18] Justin J. P. J., Frans A. J., Van D., Bosch H. W. V. Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Performance:Effcets of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators[J]. Management Science, 2006,52(11):1661-1674
[19] MacDuffie J. P. Human Resource Bundles and Manufact Uring Performance:Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry[J]. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1995,48(3)197-221
[20] Delaney J. T., Huselid M. A. The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Perceptions of Performance in Forprofit and Nonprofit Organizations[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996,39(3):949-969
[21] Bae J., Lawler J. Organizational and HRM Strategies in Korea:Impact on Firm Performance in an Emerging Economy[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2000,43(3):502-517
[22] 温忠麟.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J]. 心理学报,2005,37(2):268-274
[23] 邢周凌,王一鸣,李灵璐,邢周兰,吴新辉,沈伊默.影响中国创业板上市公司业绩因素分析——基于多案例研究[J]. 管理评论, 2014,26(1):66-77
[24] 李灵璐.企业绩效实证研究:来自中国创业板上市公司的数据分析[J]. 北京劳动保障职业学院学报,2014,8(1):26-31