跨界流动：高管多变职业路径对企业创新投入的影响研究

管理评论 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 146-162.

跨界流动：高管多变职业路径对企业创新投入的影响研究

王晓燕^1,2, 金禹航¹, 张璐¹, 郭建鸾²

1. 内蒙古工业大学经济管理学院, 呼和浩特 010051;
2. 中央财经大学商学院, 北京 100080

收稿日期:2022-06-20 出版日期:2023-10-28 发布日期:2023-11-27
通讯作者: 张璐（通讯作者），内蒙古工业大学经济管理学院教授，博士生导师，博士。
作者简介:王晓燕，内蒙古工业大学经济管理学院讲师，中央财经大学商学院博士研究生；金禹航，内蒙古工业大学经济管理学院硕士研究生；郭建鸾，中央财经大学商学院教授，博士生导师，博士。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（71962027；72162028；72264028）；内蒙古自治区哲学社会科学规划项目（2023ZZA074）。

Cross-border Mobility: Research on the Influence of Executives’ Changeable Career Paths on Enterprise Innovation Investment

Wang Xiaoyan^1,2, Jin Yuhang¹, Zhang Lu¹, Guo Jianluan²

1. Economics and Management School, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot 010051;
2. Business School, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100080

Received:2022-06-20 Online:2023-10-28 Published:2023-11-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 跨界流动使得高管职业路径呈现多变性，有助于提升高管个人特质和职业胜任力，实现高管个人目标和职业成功，然而高管多变职业路径对组织创新有何影响，目前尚未明晰。本文以2007—2020年A股上市公司为样本，根据手工收集的高管职业跨界轨迹数据，区分了高管多变职业路径的“多变挑战型”和“多变平稳型”两种类型，研究高管多变职业路径对企业创新投入的影响。研究表明：与专一传统型职业路径相比，高管多变职业路径更能够促进企业创新投入，其中高管多变挑战型和多变平稳型职业路径与企业创新投入均存在正向关系。区分产权性质后发现，企业的国有属性会削弱高管多变职业路径尤其是“多变挑战型”职业路径对创新投入的促进作用。进一步研究发现，冒险精神与创业精神在高管多变职业路径与企业创新投入的正向关系中起到了中介作用。上述研究结论为高管多变职业路径对企业创新投入的影响提供了新证据，也为引导企业从职业发展角度培养创新型企业家及其创新特质提供了微观经验证据。

关键词: 企业创新投入, 高管多变职业路径, 多变挑战型职业路径, 多变平稳型职业路径

Abstract: Cross-border mobility promotes the diversity of senior executives’ career paths, which helps to enhance their personal characteristics and professional competence, and achieve their personal goals and career success. However, the impact of executive changeable career paths on organizational innovation investment is still unclear. Taking Chinese A-share listed companies from 2007 to 2020 as samples, this paper distinguishes executive changeable career paths into changeable-challenging type and changeable-stable type according to the manual data of executives’ cross-border career track, and investigates the impact of executive changeable career paths on innovation investment. The results show that, compared with the single-minded career path, the executive changeable career paths is more conducive to enterprise innovation investment, and both executives’ changeable-challenging career path and changeable-stable career path have a positive relationship with enterprise innovation investment. Seen from the viewpoint of ownership, state-ownship attribute weakens the promoting effect of executive changeable career paths, especially changeable-challenging career path, on innovation investment. Further research shows that risk-taking spirit and entrepreneurship play a mediating role in the relationship between senior executives’ changeable career paths and enterprise innovation investment. The above research conclusions provide new evidence for the impact of executives’ diversified career paths on enterprise innovation investment, and also provide micro-empirical evidence for guiding enterprises to cultivate innovative entrepreneurs and their innovative characteristics.

Key words: enterprise innovation investment, executive changeable career paths, changeable-challenging career path, changeable-stable career path

王晓燕, 金禹航, 张璐, 郭建鸾. 跨界流动：高管多变职业路径对企业创新投入的影响研究[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(10): 146-162.

Wang Xiaoyan, Jin Yuhang, Zhang Lu, Guo Jianluan. Cross-border Mobility: Research on the Influence of Executives’ Changeable Career Paths on Enterprise Innovation Investment[J]. Management Review, 2023, 35(10): 146-162.

参考文献

[1] 张栋,胡文龙,毛新述.研发背景高管权力与公司创新[J].中国工业经济, 2021,(4):156-174
[2] 胡元木,纪端.董事技术专长、创新效率与企业绩效[J].南开管理评论, 2017,20(3):40-52
[3] 姜付秀,张晓亮,蔡文婧. CEO的财务经历有利于缓解企业融资约束吗[J].经济理论与经济管理, 2018,(7):74-87
[4] Filatotchev I., Liu X., Buck T., et al. The Export Orientation and Export Performance of High-technology SMEs in Emerging Markets:The Effects of Knowledge Transfer by Returnee Entrepreneurs[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2009,40(6):1005-1021
[5] Tilcsik A. Imprint-environment Fit and Performance:How Organizational Munificence at the Time of Hire Affects Subsequent Job Performance[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2014,59(4):639-668
[6] Schoar A., Zuo L. Shaped by Booms and Busts:How the Economy Impacts CEO Careers and Management Styles[J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2017,30(5):1425-1456
[7] 曾春影,茅宁,易志高. CEO的知青经历与企业并购溢价——基于烙印理论的实证研究[J].外国经济与管理, 2019,41(11):3-14
[8] 虞义华,赵奇锋,鞠晓生.发明家高管与企业创新[J].中国工业经济, 2018,(3):136-154
[9] 鲁桂华,潘柳芸.高管学术经历影响股价崩盘风险吗?[J].管理评论, 2021,33(4):259-270
[10] 姜付秀,张晓亮,郑晓佳.学者型CEO更富有社会责任感吗——基于企业慈善捐赠的研究[J].经济理论与经济管理, 2019,(4):35-51
[11] 刘凤朝,默佳鑫,马荣康.高管团队海外背景对企业创新绩效的影响研究[J].管理评论, 2017,29(7):135-147
[12] 权小锋,醋卫华,尹洪英.高管从军经历、管理风格与公司创新[J].南开管理评论, 2019,22(6):140-151
[13] 沈维涛,幸晓雨. CEO早期生活经历与企业投资行为——基于CEO早期经历三年困难时期的研究[J].经济管理, 2014,36(12):72-82
[14] 许年行,李哲.高管贫困经历与企业慈善捐赠[J].经济研究, 2016,51(12):133-146
[15] 吴文锋,吴冲锋,刘晓薇.中国民营上市公司高管的政府背景与公司价值[J].经济研究, 2008,43(7):130-141
[16] 张笑,赵明辉,张路蓬.政府创新补贴、高管关系嵌入与研发决策——WSR方法论视角下制造业上市公司的实证研究[J].管理评论, 2021,33(5):194-207
[17] 袁建国,后青松,程晨.企业政治资源的诅咒效应——基于政治关联与企业技术创新的考察[J].管理世界, 2015,(1):139-155
[18] Custódio C., Ferreira M. A., Matos P. Generalists versus Specialists:Lifetime Work Experience and Chief Executive Officer Pay[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2013,108(2):471-492
[19] Crossland C., Zyung J., Hiller N. J., et al. CEO Career Variety:Effects on Firm-level Strategic and Social Novelty[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2014,57(3):652-674
[20] 赵子夜,杨庆,陈坚波.通才还是专才:CEO的能力结构和公司创新[J].管理世界, 2018,34(2):123-143
[21] 何瑛,于文蕾,戴逸驰,等.高管职业经历与企业创新[J].管理世界, 2019,35(11):174-192
[22] Shartle C. L. Occupational Information, Its Development and Application[M]. Upper Saddle River:Prentice-Hall, 1952
[23] 乔坤,张昭.上市公司高管人员的职业生涯模式研究——应用最佳匹配分析方法[J].管理评论, 2015, 27(12):141-150
[24] Veiga J. F. Plateaued versus Nonplateaued Managers:Career Patterns, Attitudes, and Path Potential[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1981,24(3):566-578
[25] Walker J. W. Let's Get Realistic about Career Paths[J]. Human Resource Management, 1976,15(3):1-7
[26] Ference T. P., Stoner J. A. F., Warren E. K. Managing the Career Plateau[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1977,2(4):602-612
[27] Hall D. T. Careers in Organizations[M]. Santa Monica, California:Goodyear Publishing Company, 1976
[28] Arthur M. B., Rousseau D. M. A Career Lexicon for the 21st Century[J]. Academy of Management Perspectives, 1996,10(4):28-39
[29] Simon J. K. When Organizational Performance Matters for Personnel Decisions:Executives'Career Patterns in a Conglomerate[J]. Management Accounting Research, 2020,49(3):1-16
[30] Arthur M. B., Khapova S. N., Wilderom C. P. M. Career Success in a Boundaryless Career World[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior:The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 2005,26(2):177-202
[31] 王晓燕,郭建鸾,张璐,等."专一"还是"多变":高管职业路径如何影响企业创新?[J].经济管理, 2023,45(1):144-168
[32] Hambrick D. C., Mason P. A. Upper Echelons:The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1984,9(2):193-206
[33] Hambrick D. C. Upper Echelons Theory:An Update[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007,32(2):334-343
[34] Bandura A. Social Cognitive Theory:An Agentic Perspective[J]. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1999,2(1):21-41
[35] 何瑛,于文蕾,杨棉之. CEO复合型职业经历、企业风险承担与企业价值[J].中国工业经济, 2019,(9):155-173
[36] 德鲁克.创新与企业家精神[M].北京:机械工业出版社, 2007
[37] Parsons F. Choosing a Vocation[M]. Boston:Houghton Mifflin Company, 1909
[38] Holland J. L. Vocational Guidance for Everyone[J]. Educational Researcher, 1974,3(1):9-15
[39] Schein E. H. How Career Anchors Hold Executives to Their Career Paths[J]. Personnel, 1975,52(3):11-24
[40] Crant J. M., Bateman T. S. Charismatic Leadership Viewed from above:The Impact of Proactive Personality[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2000,21(1):63-75
[41] Uy M. A., Chan K. Y., Sam Y. L., et al. Proactivity, Adaptability and Boundaryless Career Attitudes:The Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Alertness[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2015,86(1):115-123
[42] DeFillippi R. J., Arthur M. B. The Boundaryless Career:A Competency Based Perspective[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1994,15(4):307-324
[43] 李后建,张宗益.地方官员任期、腐败与企业研发投入[J].科学学研究, 2014,32(5):744-757
[44] 金宇超,靳庆鲁,宣扬."不作为"或"急于表现":企业投资中的政治动机[J].经济研究, 2016,51(10):126-139
[45] 蒲文燕,张洪辉.基于融资风险的现金持有与企业技术创新投入的关系研究[J].中国管理科学, 2016,24(5):38-45
[46] 侯二秀,石晶.企业协同创新的动力机制研究综述[J].中国管理科学, 2015,23(S1):711-717
[47] Linda K., Stroh. A Decade of Change:Managers'Attachment to Their Organizations and Their Jobs[J]. Human Resource Management, 1994,33(4):531-548
[48] Koch M., Park S., Zahra S. A. Career Patterns in Self-employment and Career Success[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2019,62(4):1-18
[49] Briscoe J. P., Hall D. T., DeMuth R. L. F. Protean and Boundaryless Careers:An Empirical Exploration[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2006,69(1):30-47
[50] Hall D. T. The Protean Career:A Quarter-century Journey[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2004,65(1):1-13
[51] Kickul J., Gundry L. Prospecting for Strategic Advantage:The Proactive Entrepreneurial Personality and Small Firm Innovation[J]. Journal of Small Business Management, 2002,40(2):85-97
[52] 袁菲菲,谢永珍.企业家冒险倾向、区域冒险精神与企业创新——一个有调节的中介模型[J].科技进步与对策, 2022,39(9):83-93
[53] 龚光明,曾照存.公司特有风险、管理者风险特质与企业投资效率——来自中国上市公司的经验数据[J].经济与管理研究, 2013,(11):67-75
[54] 黎常,朱玥,王永跃.创业激情对创业坚持行为的影响机制研究[J].科研管理, 2018,39(9):134-142
[55] 温忠麟,刘红云,侯杰泰.调节效应和中介效应分析[M].北京:教育科学出版社, 2012
[56] 陈修德,栗辉杨,马文聪,等.董事会失败容忍会影响企业创新吗?[J].管理评论, 2021,33(8):90-103