有意义的创新:概念维度、结构测量与绩效影响

管理评论 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (7): 86-95.

有意义的创新:概念维度、结构测量与绩效影响

曲冠楠¹, 接园², 陈劲^2,3, 王璐瑶^2,3, Juan Rogers⁴

1. 中国科学院大学公共政策与管理学院, 北京 100049;
2. 清华大学经济管理学院, 北京 100084;
3. 清华大学技术创新研究中心, 北京 100084;
4. 佐治亚理工大学公共政策学院, 亚特兰大 30332

收稿日期:2021-01-11 出版日期:2023-07-28 发布日期:2023-08-24
通讯作者: 陈劲(通讯作者),清华大学经济管理学院教授,博士生导师
作者简介:曲冠楠，中国科学院大学公共政策与管理学院助理研究员；接园，清华大学经济管理学院博士研究生；王璐瑶，清华大学经济管理学院博士后；Juan Rogers，佐治亚理工大学公共政策学院教授。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点国际合作研究项目(71810107004);国家自然科学基金专项项目(L1924081);北京市哲学社会科学基金重大项目(21LLGLA002);中国博士后科学基金项目(2021M691791)。

Meaningful Innovation: Conceptual Dimensions, Measurement and Innovation Performance

Qu Guannan¹, Jie Yuan², Chen Jin^2,3, Wang Luyao^2,3, Juan Rogers⁴

1. School of Public Policy and Management, UCAS, Beijing 100049;
2. School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084;
3. Research Center for Technological Innovation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084;
4. School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta 30332

Received:2021-01-11 Online:2023-07-28 Published:2023-08-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 有意义的创新(meaningful innovation,MI)作为新时代引领企业积极回应社会需求,助力其提升可持续竞争优势并实现系统性超越的全新范式开始获得关注。然而,相关研究体系尚未完善,尤其缺乏对相关概念的可靠测度以及与之相关的实证检验。本研究基于文献采集,对有意义的创新的理论基础进行系统性回顾,归纳与识别其基本框架与核心概念。进而,运用访谈法与问卷调查法,针对内涵结构的5大核心维度实施"意义导向"(meaning orientation)的量表开发与信效度检验,形成可靠的有意义的创新的测量模型,并进一步验证有意义的创新过程对创新绩效显著的正向影响。

关键词: 有意义的创新, 意义导向的创新, 意义导向量表, 量表开发, 创新绩效

Abstract: Meaningful Innovation (MI), as a new paradigm that leads enterprises to actively respond to social demands in the new era and helps them comprehensively improve their sustainable competitive advantages and achieve systematic transcendence, starts to get attention. However, the relevant studies are still to be mature, especially evidenced by the lack of reliable measurement of the key concepts of the MI and the empirical test of the core framework. Based on the existing literature, this study systematically reviews the theoretical basis of the MI, summarizes and identifies its basic framework and core concepts. Furthermore, interview and questionnaire are used to conduct scale development, and reliability and validity test aiming at the five core dimensions of meaningful innovation, and further verify the significant positive influence of meaning orientation (MO) on innovation performance. On this basis, a reliable measurement model of the MI is built in order to provide implications for the further development of this paradigm.

Key words: meaningful innovation, meaning-orientation, MO-Scale, scale development, innovation performance

曲冠楠, 接园, 陈劲, 王璐瑶, Juan Rogers. 有意义的创新:概念维度、结构测量与绩效影响[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(7): 86-95.

Qu Guannan, Jie Yuan, Chen Jin, Wang Luyao, Juan Rogers. Meaningful Innovation: Conceptual Dimensions, Measurement and Innovation Performance[J]. Management Review, 2023, 35(7): 86-95.

参考文献

[1] 陈劲,曲冠楠.有意义的创新:引领新时代哲学与人文精神复兴的创新范式[J].技术经济, 2018,37(7):4-12
[2] 陈劲,曲冠楠,王璐瑶.有意义的创新:源起、内涵辨析与启示[J].科学学研究, 2019,37(11):261-270
[3] 曲冠楠,陈劲,梅亮.有意义的创新:基于复杂系统视角的交互耦合框架[J].科学学研究, 2020,38(11):187-196
[4] 曲冠楠,陈劲,王璐瑶,等.创新意义资产:理论基础、战略价值与企业实践[J].科学学研究, 2021,39(6):162-170
[5] 陈劲,朱子钦,梅亮.意义导向的科技创新管理模式探究[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2019,40(12):3-18
[6] Kuhn T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1962
[7] Schumpeter J. A. Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung[M]. Leipzig:Duncker&Humblot, 1912
[8] Schumpeter J. A. The Theory of Economic Development:An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle[M]. Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press, 1934
[9] Ettlie J. E., Bridges W. P., O'keefe R. D. Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical versus Incremental Innovation[J]. Management Science, 1984,30(6):682-695
[10] Von Hippel E. Lead Users:A Source of Novel Product Concepts[J]. Management Science, 1986,32(7):791-805
[11] Henderson R. M., Clark K. B. Architectural Innovation:The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990,35(1):9-30
[12] Christensen C. M. The Innovator's Dilemma:When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail[M]. Boston:Harvard Business School Press, 1997
[13] Chesbrough H. Open Innovation:The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology[M]. Boston:Harvard Business Press, 2003
[14] Bianchi B., Bartolotti F. On the Concept of Formal Innovation. European Regional Science Association[C]. 36th European Congress. ETH, Zurich, 1996
[15] Cappetta R., Cillo P., Ponti A. Convergent Designs in Fine Fashion:An Evolutionary Model for Stylistic Innovation[J]. Research Policy, 2006,35(9):1273-1290
[16] Verganti R. Design-driven Innovation:Changing the Rules of Competition By Radically Innovating What Things Mean[M]. Boston:Harvard Business Press, 2009
[17] Stoneman P. Soft Innovation:Economics, Product Aesthetics, and the Creative Industries[M]. New York:Oxford University Press, 2010
[18] Mumford M. D. Social Innovation:Ten Cases from Benjamin Franklin[J]. Creativity Research Journal, 2002,14(2):253-266
[19] Nicholls A., Murdock A. Social innovation:Blurring Boundaries to Reconfigure Markets[M]. New York, USA:Palgrave Macmillan, 2012
[20] Owen R., Macnaghten P., Stilgoe J. Responsible Research and Innovation:From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society[J]. Science&Public Policy, 2012,39(6):751-760
[21] Stilgoe J., Owen R., Macnaghten P. Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation[J]. Research Policy, 2013,42(9):1568-1580
[22] Swann G. P. Common Innovation:How We Create the Wealth of Nations[M]. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014
[23] Duchesneau T. D., Cohn S. F., Dutton J. E. A Study of Innovation in Manufacturing:Determinants, Processes, and Methodological Issues[R]. Orono:The Social Science Research Institute, University of Maine, 1979
[24] Daft R. L., Becker S. W. Innovation in Organizations[M]. New York:Elsevier, 1978
[25] Damanpour F. Organizational Innovation:A Meta-analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1991,34(3):555-590
[26] Polanyi M. Personal Knowledge:Towards a Post Critical Philosophy[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1958
[27] Polanyi M. The Tacit Dimension[M]. London:Routledge&Kegan Paul Ltd, 1967
[28] Phillips W., Lee H., Ghobadian A., et al. Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship:A Systematic Review[J]. Group and Organization Management, 2015,40(3):428-461
[29] Bowen H. R., Johnson F. E. Social Responsibility of the Businessman[M]. New York:Harper, 1953
[30] Mulgan G. The Process of Social Innovation[J]. Innovations:Technology, Governance, Globalization, 2006,1(2):145-162
[31] Maccallum D. Social Innovation and Territorial Development[M]. Farham:Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2009
[32] Moulaert F. Social Innovation:Institutionally Embedded, Territorially (re) Produced, Social Innovation and Territorial Development[M]. London:Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2016
[33] 梅亮,陈劲.责任式创新:源起、归因解析与理论框架[J].管理世界, 2015,(8):39-57
[34] Verganti R. Design as Brokering of Languages:Innovation Strategies in Italian Firms[J]. Design Management Journal, 2003,14(3):34-42
[35] Verganti R. Overcrowded:Designing Meaningful Products in a World Awash with Ideas[M]. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 2016
[36] Kline R. B. Assumptions in Structural Equation Modeling[M]//Hoyle R. H.(Ed.). Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling. New York:The Guilford Press, 2012
[37] Kline R. B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling[M]. New York:Guilford Publications, 2015
[38] Vrieze S. I. Model Selection and Psychological Theory:A Discussion of the Differences between the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC)[J]. Psychological Methods, 2012,17(2):228-243
[39] Nunnally J. C. The Assessment of Reliability[J]. Psychometric Theory, 1994,3:248-292
[40] Hair J., Black W., Babin B., et al. Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Edition)[M]. Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall, 2009
[41] Fornell C., Larcker D. F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1981,18(1):39-50
[42] Welbourne T. M., Johnson D. E., Erez A. The Role-based Performance Scale:Validity Analysis of a Theory-based Measure[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1998,41(5):540-555