管理评论 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 304-317.

• 公共管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国地方环境分权与制度变迁——多级分权度测算与污染治理效应评估

马本, 胡天贶, 赵康   

  1. 中国人民大学环境学院, 北京 100872
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-24 出版日期:2022-05-28 发布日期:2022-06-17
  • 通讯作者: 胡天贶(通讯作者),中国人民大学环境学院硕士研究生;赵康,中国人民大学环境学院硕士研究生。
  • 作者简介:马本,中国人民大学环境学院副教授,博士
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目(16CJY021)。

Environmental Decentralization and Institutional Change of Local Governments in China: Measurement of Multi-level Decentralization and Assessment of Pollution Abatement Effect

Ma Ben, Hu Tiankuang, Zhao Kang   

  1. School of Environment and Natural Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872
  • Received:2020-09-24 Online:2022-05-28 Published:2022-06-17

摘要: 环境权力在多层级政府间的合理配置是构建现代环境治理体系的基石。本文基于成本收益分析建立了环境分权理论框架,聚焦中国多层级地方政府,基于环保系统人员数测算了省、市、县环境分权及其动态变化,对省级以下环境分权定量研究进行了深化拓展;利用1992—2015年面板数据的多种工具变量回归,定量评估了多层级环境分权的污染治理效果。研究发现,中国环境管理向县分权和向中央集权并存,省级、市级管理力量被相对削弱;环境权力下放至县属于“过度分权”,加剧了工业污染;扩大市级环境权、特别是监测权有助于工业污染减排;环保目标责任制的强力协调“中和”了县级增污和市级减排效应。环境分权的治污效果因不同管理职能、污染物和区域迥异,其政策启示是,应探索按管理要素划分的,与区域特征、污染物类型相契合的灵活性的纵向环境权力格局。

关键词: 环境分权, 污染治理, 垂直化改革, 环境管理制度

Abstract: A rational assignment of environmental power among multi-level governments is perceived as a footstone to establish modernized environmental governance system in China. This paper establishes a theoretical framework for environmental decentralization (ED) based on cost-benefit analysis. Focusing on China's multi-level local governments, this paper calculates the degree and evolution of ED for provincial, prefecture-level, and county-level divisions based on staff number of environmental management system. To the authors' knowledge, this paper fills a research gap by examining China's multi-local ED quantitatively. We then evaluate the effect of each ED for the first time on industrial pollution abatement by employing panel datasets from 1992 to 2015 based on several instrumental variables methods. Empirical results indicate that China's environmental management is characterized by both decentralization toward counties and centralization toward the central, and environmental power of provincial and prefectural-level is weakened relatively. In China's decentralization system, environmental management by counties increases industrial pollution, indicating that there exists excessive decentralization. Enlarging prefectural-level power, especially environmental monitoring power, will facilitate the reduction of industrial pollution. The strong coordination by environmental target-oriented responsibility system can partially neutralize the opposite effects of ED on pollution at county and prefectural levels. The abatement effect varies significantly due to the difference in management function, region and pollutant, suggesting that there is a need to explore a more feasible system that best fits the features of specific function, region and pollutant.

Key words: environmental decentralization, pollution abatement, centralized reform, environmental management system