“减持迷雾”下的员工持股计划——基于股权激励的对比分析

›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10): 164-177.

• 组织行为与人力资源管理 • 上一篇下一篇

“减持迷雾”下的员工持股计划——基于股权激励的对比分析

郝永亮¹, 金昕², 张永冀³

1. 中央财经大学商学院, 北京 100081;
2. 中央财经大学统计与数学学院, 北京 100081;
3. 北京理工大学管理与经济学院, 北京 100081

收稿日期:2018-12-10 出版日期:2019-10-28 发布日期:2019-11-05
通讯作者: 张永冀(通讯作者),北京理工大学管理与经济学院副教授,硕士生导师,博士
作者简介:郝永亮,中央财经大学商学院博士研究生;金昕,中央财经大学统计与数学学院博士研究生。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年项目（71102110）

ESOP Confusion on Major Shareholder's Share Selling: Based on Comparative Analysis between the Equity Incentives and Employee Stock Ownership Plans

Hao Yongliang¹, Jin Xin², Zhang Yongji³

1. Business School, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081;
2. School of Statistics and Mathematics, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081;
3. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081

Received:2018-12-10 Online:2019-10-28 Published:2019-11-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

员工持股计划的重新引入是我国证券市场近年来一项重要的制度探索，但其过去四年多笼罩在"浮亏"与"减持"的争议之中。本文首先将员工持股计划与实施经验较丰富的股权激励在机制设计上相比较，利用双重差分与PSM方法实证对比两种方案的激励效果及探究背后原因。实证结果发现，开展员工持股计划的公司业绩的动态变化情况不如实施股权激励的公司；限售股解禁对未来上市公司实施员工持股计划有显著的正向影响；投资者可以从员工持股计划的股票来源识别出大股东的减持动机，相较于非减持动机的员工持股计划或股权激励，裹挟着大股东自利动机的员工持股计划存在显著偏低的短期市场反应。文中研究结论对未来员工持股计划的制度设计与完善提供了经验证据，同时对大股东的"另类减持"监管提供了参考，丰富了权益薪酬契约相关领域的研究。

关键词: 员工持股计划, 股权激励, 股东减持, 大股东自利

Abstract:

Re-introduction of Employee Stock Ownership Plan is a new institutional exploration in Chinese stock market. However, in last 4 years, ESOP has been mired in controversies because of the floating loss and controlling shareholder's share selling. This paper first compares ESOP with proven equity incentives and then uses difference-in-difference matching estimators to compare different effects between the two incentive approaches and find out the underlying reasons. The results show that, firstly, firms implementing ESOPs have less improvement in financial performance compared with these employing equity incentives. Secondly, the unlocking of restricted stock has significant positive effect on the implementation of ESOP in the future. Thirdly, investors could distinguish ESOPs containing self-interest motivation of major shareholder from common ESOPs by stock resources, so such ESOPs might have a significantly downward market reaction in short term. These findings provide empirical evidences for the further improvement of ESOP's policy design and the supervision on major shareholders' uncommon selling approaches. These findings could enrich the studies of equity compensation contract as well.

Key words: employee stock ownership plans(ESOP), equity incentives(EI), shareholders' share selling, major shareholders' self-interest

郝永亮, 金昕, 张永冀. “减持迷雾”下的员工持股计划——基于股权激励的对比分析[J]. , 2019, 31(10): 164-177.

Hao Yongliang, Jin Xin, Zhang Yongji. ESOP Confusion on Major Shareholder's Share Selling: Based on Comparative Analysis between the Equity Incentives and Employee Stock Ownership Plans[J]. , 2019, 31(10): 164-177.

参考文献

[1] Kelso L. O., Hetter P. How to Turn Eighty Million Workers into Capitalists on Borrowed Money, and Other Proposals[M]. New York:Random House, 1967
[2] Oliver E. W. Markets and Hierarchies:Analysis and Antitrust Implications[M]. New York:The Free Press, 1975
[3] Weitzman M. L. The Share Economy:Conquering Stagflation[M]. Cambridge:Harvard University Press, 1984
[4] Freeman R. E. Strategic Management:A Stakeholder Approach[M]. New York:Pitman, 1984
[5] Ellerman D. P. Property and Contract in Economics:the Case for Economic Democracy[M]. Cambridge MA:Blackwell, 1992
[6] 蒋一苇. 经济民主论[J]. 中国社会科学, 1989,(1):9-22
[7] 张孝梅. 混合所有制改革背景的员工持股境况[J]. 改革, 2016,(1):121-129
[8] 王晋斌. 为什么中国上市公司的内部职工持股计划不成功[J]. 金融研究, 2005,(10):101-113
[9] 顾斌,周立烨. 我国上市公司股权激励实施效果的研究[J]. 会计研究, 2007,(2):79-84
[10] Smith A. J. Corporate Ownership Structure and Performance:The Case of Management Buyouts[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2004,27(1):143-164
[11] 陈艳艳. 员工股权激励的实施动机与经济后果研究[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(9):163-176
[12] Sharma V. Independent Directors and the Propensity to Pay Dividends[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2011,17(4):1001-1015
[13] 韩慧博,吕长江,李然. 非效率定价、管理层股权激励与公司股票股利[J]. 财经研究, 2012,38(10):47-56
[14] 陈艳艳. 我国股权激励市场反应的实证检验——降低代理成本抑或管理层寻租[J]. 投资研究, 2013,32(7):108-125
[15] Agrawal A., Mandelker G. N. Managerial Incentives and Corporate Investment and Financing Decisions[J]. Journal of Finance, 1987,42(4):823-837
[16] 汝毅,郭晨曦,吕萍. 高管股权激励、约束机制与对外直接投资速率[J]. 财经研究, 2016,42(3):4-15
[17] 吕长江,张海平. 股权激励计划对公司投资行为的影响[J]. 管理世界, 2011,(11):118-126
[18] 田轩,孟清扬. 股权激励计划能促进企业创新吗[J]. 南开管理评论, 2018,22(3):176-190
[19] 胡国强,盖地. 高管股权激励与银行信贷决策——基于我国民营上市公司的经验证据[J]. 会计研究, 2014,(4):58-65
[20] 王兴亮. 员工持股计划变形记[N]. 中国证券报, 2017-08-04(A3)
[21] Core J. E., Guay W. R. Stock Option Plans for Non-Executive Employees[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2001,61(2):253-287
[22] Aboody D., Johnson N. B., Kasznik R. Employee Stock Options and Future Firm Performance:Evidence from Option Repricings[J]. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 2010,50(1):74-92
[23] 黄群慧,余菁,王欣,等. 新时期中国员工持股制度研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2014,(7):5-16
[24] 吕长江,郑慧莲,严明珠,等. 上市公司股权激励制度设计:是激励还是福利?[J]. 管理世界, 2009,(9):133-147
[25] Ittner C. D., Lambert R. A., Larcker D. F. The Structure and Performance Consequences of Equity Grants to Employees of New Economy Firms[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2002,34(1):89-127
[26] Oyera P., Schaeferb S. Why Do Some Firms Give Stock Options to All Employees?:An Empirical Examination of Alternative Theories[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2005,76(1):99-133
[27] Bergmana N. K. Jenter D. Employee Sentiment and Stock Option Compensation[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2007,84(3):667-712
[28] Chang X., Fu K., Low A. et al. Non-Executive Employee Stock Options and Corporate Innovation[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2011,115(1):168-188
[29] Alchian A. A., Demsetz H. Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization[J]. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 1972,62(5):777-795
[30] Meulbroek L. K. The Efficiency of Equity-Linked Compensation:Understanding the Full Cost of Awarding Executive Stock Options[J]. Financial Management, 2001,30(2):5-44
[31] Jones D. C., Kalmi P., Mäkinen M. The Productivity Effects of Stock Option Schemes:Evidence from Finnish Panel Data[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2010,33(1):67-80
[32] 沈红波,华凌昊,许基集. 国有企业实施员工持股计划的经营绩效:激励相容还是激励不足[J]. 管理世界, 2018,34(11):121-133
[33] Porta R. L., Lopezdesilanes F., Shleifer A. et al. Law and Finance[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1998,106(6):1113-1155
[34] Heron R. A., Lie E. Does Backdating Explain the Stock Price Pattern around Executive Stock Option Grants?[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2007,83(2):271-295
[35] Bebchuk L. A., Fried J. M. Executive Compensation as an Agency Problem[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2003,17(3):71-92
[36] 孔东民. 中国股市噪音成分及影响因素检验[J]. 南方经济, 2007,(1):39-52
[37] 黄建欢,尹筑嘉,粟瑞. 中国股市限售股解禁的减持效应研究[J]. 管理科学, 2009,22(4):97-106
[38] 郦金梁,廖理,沈红波. 股权分置改革与股票需求价格弹性——基于供给需求的理论框架和经验证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2010,(2):36-46
[39] 陈其安,张红真. 限售股减持对我国股票市场影响的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014,22(S1):318-323
[40] 章晟,景辛辛,苏姣. 规范大股东减持能有效抑制股价波动吗?——基于《减持新规》[9号文]的自然实验[J]. 证券市场导报, 2019,(3):13-23
[41] Shefrin H., Statman M. The Disposition to Sell Winners Too Early and Ride Losers Too Long:Theory and Evidence[J]. Journal of Finance, 1985,40(3):777-790
[42] Piotroski J. D., Roulstone D. T. Do Insider Trades Reflect Both Contrarian Beliefs and Superior Knowledge About Future Cash Flow Realizations?[J]. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 2005,39(1):55-81
[43] 张程睿,王华,梁斯宁. 首发限售股原股东的减持行为及动因研究[J]. 经济管理, 2016,38(6):111-124
[44] 吴育辉,吴世农. 股票减持过程中的大股东掏空行为研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2010,(5):121-130
[45] 鲁桂华,张静,刘保良. 中国上市公司自愿性积极业绩预告:利公还是利私——基于大股东减持的经验证据[J]. 南开管理评论, 2017,20(2):133-143
[46] 蔡宁,魏明海. "大小非"减持中的盈余管理[J]. 审计研究, 2009,(2):40-49
[47] 张利红,刘国常. 大股东控制与外部审计治理——股票全流通时代的经验证据[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2014,36(9):113-124
[48] 陈灿. 大股东减持与机构投资者交易行为研究[J]. 金融经济学研究, 2016,31(4):92-100
[49] 谢德仁,崔宸瑜,廖珂. 上市公司"高送转"与内部人股票减持:"谋定后动"还是"顺水推舟"?[J]. 金融研究, 2016, (11):158-173
[50] Johnson S., Porta R. L., Shleifer A. Tunneling[J]. American Economic Review, 2000,90(2):22-27
[51] 蒋运冰,苏亮瑜. 员工持股计划的股东财富效应研究——基于我国上市公司员工持股计划的合约要素视角[J]. 证券市场导报, 2016,(11):13-22
[52] 王砾,代昀昊,孔东民. 激励相容:上市公司员工持股计划的公告效应[J]. 经济学动态, 2017,(2):37-50
[53] 王小鲁,樊纲,余静文. 中国分省份市场化指数报告2016[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2017
[54] 王小鲁,樊纲,马光荣. 中国分省企业经营环境指数2017年报告[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2017
[55] 贾明,张喆,万迪昉. 股改方案、代理成本与大股东解禁股出售[J]. 管理世界, 2009,(9):148-165
[56] 陈冬华,陈富生,沈永建,等. 高管继任、职工薪酬与隐性契约——基于中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 经济研究, 2011,46(S2):100-111
[57] Fama E. F., French K. R. Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1993, 33(1):3-56
[58] 官平. 员工持股计划:"安全垫"不安全[N]. 中国证券报, 2017-02-09(A1)

“减持迷雾”下的员工持股计划——基于股权激励的对比分析

ESOP Confusion on Major Shareholder's Share Selling: Based on Comparative Analysis between the Equity Incentives and Employee Stock Ownership Plans

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	于震, 张行. “效率契约”还是“管理权力”？——公司治理对CEO股权激励的影响研究[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(10): 259-275.
[2]	刘井建, 赵革新, 王健. 高管股权激励合约特征与公司现金持有——基于PSM?DID的识别策略[J]. , 2018, 30(7): 231-244.
[3]	聂常虹, 武香婷. 股权激励促进科技成果转化——基于中国科学院研究所案例分析[J]. , 2017, 29(4): 264-272.
[4]	陈效东, 周嘉南. 非激励型高管股权激励、企业投资方式与控制人收益[J]. , 2016, 28(5): 161-174.
[5]	陈艳艳. 员工股权激励的实施动机与经济后果研究[J]. , 2015, 27(9): 163-176.
[6]	梁彤缨1 雷鹏1 陈修德2. 管理层激励对企业研发效率的影响研究 ——来自中国工业上市公司的经验证据[J]. , 2015, 27(5): 145-.