环境保护与企业发展真的不可兼得吗?

›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (8): 224-234.

环境保护与企业发展真的不可兼得吗?

唐鹏程^1,2, 杨树旺^1,2

1. 中国地质大学(武汉)经济管理学院, 武汉 430074;
2. 中国地质大学(武汉)资源环境经济研究中心, 武汉 430074

收稿日期:2016-05-10 出版日期:2018-08-28 发布日期:2018-08-31
作者简介:唐鹏程,中国地质大学(武汉)经济管理学院,资源环境经济研究中心博士研究生;杨树旺,中国地质大学(武汉)经济管理学院,资源环境经济研究中心教授,博士生导师。
基金资助:
教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目（12JZD034）；国家软科学研究计划项目（2013GXS4B067）；中国地质大学（武汉）湖北省生态文明研究中心基金（SWSZK2015Z11）。

Is There Really a Trade-off Between Environmental Protection and Corporate Development?

Tang Pengcheng^1,2, Yang Shuwang^1,2

1. Economics and Management College, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074;
2. Economics and Environment Research Center, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074

Received:2016-05-10 Online:2018-08-28 Published:2018-08-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

无论是区域行业层面的环境规制效应还是企业层面的环境责任与企业表现均得出模糊甚至矛盾的结论，其根源在于对企业的异质性、情境因素的复杂性及模式的等效性关注不足。本文选取2013-2014年中国204个重污染上市公司作为研究样本，使用模糊定性比较分析回答了环境保护与企业发展能否共赢的问题。研究发现：忽视情境因素的作用，单一的环境保护既不能提升企业价值也不能降低企业价值；利益相关者间交互组合是实现环境保护与企业发展共赢的最优选择，但受制于资源的有限性及利益相关者感知的门槛而不必追求完备性；无论是提升还是降低企业价值均不存在唯一的组合形式，模式具有等效性；但是在以环境保护为基础的各组合中，投资者关系管理应该处于核心位置，要理清其层次性；国有企业的上市过程一定程度上削弱了其社会性目标，其模式也逐步趋向市场化，但仍然不如民营企业模式多样。本文的结论对于实现环境保护与企业发展共赢具有较强的指导意义。

关键词: 环境保护, 企业发展, 重污染企业, 模糊定性比较分析

Abstract:

Ignoring the heterogeneity of firms, complexity of contingency factors and equivalence of the pattern often result in the conclusion of effects of environmental regulation from regional and industry level, or environment performance and corporate financial performance from firm level. This paper selects the data of 204 Chinese heavy pollution listed companies in 2013 to 2014 as research samples, by using fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis to answer the trade-off between environmental protection and corporate development. The study finds that investment in single environment protection cannot improve firm value effectively, while multidimensional combination is the optimal choice. But there is no need to pursue completeness due to the limited resources and threshold of the stakeholder perception. The pattern for enhancing or reducing the firm value is not unique and different patterns can result in the same effect. But among those patterns aimed at environmental protection, investor relationship management should be at the core position, and the level of stakeholders should be clarified. The listing process of state-owned enterprises has weakened social goals to some extent, but the patterns are not as diverse as non-state-owned enterprises. The conclusions of this paper have strong guiding significance for achieving a win-win situation for firms.

Key words: environmental protection, corporate development, heavy pollution firms, fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis

唐鹏程, 杨树旺. 环境保护与企业发展真的不可兼得吗?[J]. , 2018, 30(8): 224-234.

Tang Pengcheng, Yang Shuwang. Is There Really a Trade-off Between Environmental Protection and Corporate Development?[J]. , 2018, 30(8): 224-234.

参考文献

[1] Wang P., Dai H. C., Ren S. Y., et al. Achieving Copenhagen Target through Carbon Emission Trading:Economic Impacts Assessment in Guangdong Province of China[J]. Energy, 2015,79:212-227
[2] 沈洪涛,廖菁华. 会计与生态文明制度建设[J]. 会计研究, 2014,(7):12-17
[3] 贾明,童立,张喆. 高管激励影响公司环境污染行为吗?[J]. 管理评论, 2016,28(2):149-165
[4] 李大元,孙妍,杨广. 企业环境效益、能源效率与经济绩效关系研究[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(5):29-37
[5] 唐鹏程,杨树旺. 企业社会责任投资模式研究:基于价值的判断标准[J]. 中国工业经济, 2016,(7):109-126
[6] Sen S. Corporate Governance, Environmental Regulations, and Technological Change[J]. European Economic Review, 2015,80:36-61
[7] Freeman R. E. Managing for Stakeholders:Trade-offs or Value Creation[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2011,96(1):7-9
[8] Garcia-Castro R., Francoeur C. When More is not Better:Complementarities, Costs and Contingencies in Stakeholder Management[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2016,37(2):406-424
[9] 夏鑫,何建民,刘嘉毅. 定性比较分析的研究逻辑-兼论其对经济管理学研究的启示[J]. 财经研究, 2014,40(10):97-107
[10] Popp D., Newell R. Where does Energy R&D Come from? Examining Crowding out from Energy R&D[J]. Energy Economics, 2012,34(4):980-991
[11] 涂红星,肖序. 环境管制对自主创新影响的实证研究——基于负二项分布模型[J]. 管理评论, 2014,26(1):57-65
[12] 李树,陈刚. 环境管制与生产率增长——以APPCL2000的修订为例[J]. 经济研究, 2013,48(1):17-31
[13] 黄志基,贺灿飞,杨帆,等. 中国环境规制、地理区位与企业生产率增长[J]. 地理学报, 2015,70(10):1581-1591
[14] 权小锋,吴世农,尹洪英. 企业社会责任与股价崩盘风险:"价值利器"或"自利工具"?[J]. 经济研究, 2015,50(11):49-64
[15] Dixon-Fowler H. R., Slater D. J., Johnson J. L., et al. Beyond "Does it Pay to Be Green?" A Meta-analysis of Moderators of the CEP-CFP Relationship[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2013,112(2):353-366
[16] Trumpp C., Guenther T. Too Little or Too Much? Exploring U-shaped Relationships between Corporate Environmental Performance and Corporate Financial Performance[J]. Business Strategy & the Environment, 2015,35(6):1269-1274
[17] 刘运国,刘梦宁. 雾霾影响了重污染企业的盈余管理吗?——基于政治成本假说的考察[J]. 会计研究, 2015,(3):26-33
[18] Wang Q., Dou J., Jia S. A Meta-analytic Review of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance:The Moderating Effect of Contextual Factors[J]. Business & Society, 2016,55(8):1083-1121
[19] Su W., Tsang E. W. K. Product Diversification and Financial Performance:The Moderating Role of Secondary Stakeholders[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2015,58(4):1128-1148
[20] Clarkson M. B. E. A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1995,20(1):92-117
[21] Gao Y., Hafsi T. Government Intervention, Peers' Giving and Corporate Philanthropy:Evidence from Chinese Private SMEs[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2015,132(2):433-447
[22] Chen S., Sun Z., Tang S., et al. Government Intervention and Investment Efficiency:Evidence From China[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2011,17(2):259-271
[23] 姜付秀,朱冰,王运通. 国有企业的经理激励契约更不看重绩效吗?[J]. 管理世界, 2014,(9):143-159
[24] 侯青川,靳庆鲁,陈明端. 经济发展、政府偏袒与公司发展-基于政府代理问题与公司代理问题的分析[J]. 经济研究, 2015,50(1):140-152
[25] 贾兴平,刘益. 外部环境、内部资源与企业社会责任[J]. 南开管理评论, 2014,17(6):13-18
[26] 付书科,杨树旺,唐鹏程,等. 我国有色金属行业社会责任评价——来自上市企业数据[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2014,(4):18-26
[27] Tang Z., Tang J. Stakeholder-firm Power Difference, Stakeholders' CSR Orientation, and SMEs' Environmental Performance in China[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2012,27(4):436-455