管理评论 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 202-215.

• 会计与财务管理 • 上一篇    

交易所审核问询与定价效率

郑登津1, 张明天1, 张巍2   

  1. 1. 中央财经大学会计学院, 北京 100081;
    2. 中央财经大学信息学院, 北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-17 发布日期:2026-07-08
  • 作者简介:郑登津,中央财经大学会计学院教授,博士生导师,博士;张明天,中央财经大学会计学院博士研究生;张巍(通讯作者),中央财经大学信息学院教授,博士生导师,博士。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(71874215;72472169);北京市自然科学基金面上项目(9232020);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(24YJAZH228);中央高校基本科研业务费。

Exchange Regulatory Inquiries and Pricing Efficiency

Zheng Dengjin1, Zhang Mingtian1, Zhang Wei2   

  1. 1. School of Accountancy, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081;
    2. School of Information, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081
  • Received:2024-12-17 Published:2026-07-08

摘要: 审核问询函是交易所在注册制下监管拟上市公司信息披露质量的重要工具,但对IPO审核问询函的回复质量缺乏深度探讨。本文基于LDA主题模型,量化了拟上市公司在IPO审核问询中“答非所问”的程度,并探讨其对IPO定价效率的影响。研究结果表明:第一,审核问询中“答非所问”现象越严重,IPO定价效率越低。第二,“答非所问”现象分别通过影响一级市场机构投资者和二级市场投资者的定价行为降低定价效率。第三,“答非所问”对定价效率的作用会受到承销商声誉和要素市场发育程度的影响。第四,“答非所问”现象的加剧,导致信息不对称扩大和投资者投机性交易增加;同时,“答非所问”严重的公司,在上市后财务重述概率和经营风险显著提高、研发密度显著降低。文章从审核问询函回复质量的角度,检验了企业IPO阶段问询回复中“答非所问”行为的负面后果,为注册制背景下交易所优化问询监管框架提供了经验证据。

关键词: 审核问询, IPO抑价, 答非所问, LDA主题模型

Abstract: Regulatory inquiry letters serve as an essential tool for exchanges to regulate the quality of information disclosure by companies under the registration-based IPO system. This paper employs a LDA topic model to quantify the extent of “irrelevant responses” in IPO regulatory inquiries and explores their impact on IPO pricing efficiency. The findings are as follows: First, the more severe the phenomenon of “irrelevant responses” in regulatory inquiry letters, the lower the IPO pricing efficiency. Second, “irrelevant responses” reduce pricing efficiency by influencing the pricing behavior of institutional investors in the primary market and investors in the secondary market. Third, the effect of “irrelevant responses” on pricing efficiency is moderated by the underwriter’s reputation and the development of factor markets. Fourth, the intensification of the “irrelevant responses” phenomenon leads to the expansion of information asymmetry and an increase in investors’ speculative transactions. Concurrently, companies with severe “irrelevant responses” issues exhibit significantly higher probabilities of financial restatements and elevated operational risks post-IPO, while demonstrating reduced R&D intensity. This paper, from the perspective of the quality of responses to regulatory inquiries, demonstrates that “irrelevant responses” during the IPO stage carry valuable market information. This finding offers a theoretical foundation for optimizing the inquiry supervision framework employed by exchanges under the registration-based IPO system.

Key words: IPO regulatory inquiries, IPO underpricing, irrelevant responses, LDA topic model