管理评论 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 181-196.

• 会计与财务管理 • 上一篇    

相对业绩评价、行业成长与企业风险承担

廖冠民, 王家晶   

  1. 中国人民大学商学院, 北京 100872
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-14 发布日期:2025-05-06
  • 作者简介:廖冠民,中国人民大学商学院教授,博士生导师,博士;王家晶,中国人民大学商学院博士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(71972180;72472150)。

Relative Performance Evaluation, Industry Growth and Risk Taking

Liao Guanmin, Wang Jiajing   

  1. Business School, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872
  • Received:2022-11-14 Published:2025-05-06

摘要: 本文研究行业成长性如何影响相对业绩评价的风险承担激励效应。中国上市公司实施股权激励需披露其行权业绩考核方式,据此可以获得公司是否采用相对业绩评价的显性度量。基于该独特数据,本文实证发现,当行业成长速度较快时,股权激励契约采用相对业绩评价对企业风险承担的促进作用更加显著。该结果对于更换风险承担的度量方法、采用工具变量估计都是稳健的。机制分析表明,行业成长性通过提高相对业绩评价的考核标准,促使管理者承担更高风险以完成考核目标。进一步分析显示,行业成长性较高时,相对业绩评价促进风险承担有助于企业增加研发投入、提升业绩,而对债务融资成本与财务困境风险没有显著影响。本文研究结果表明,行业环境会影响业绩评价方式的激励效应。

关键词: 相对业绩评价, 风险承担, 行业成长, 股权激励

Abstract: This paper mainly studies how industry growth influences the incentive effect of relative performance evaluation on risk-taking. Based on whether the equity incentive plan of listed companies adopts relative performance evaluation, the explicit measure of relative performance evaluation can be obtained. With this unique data, this paper finds that when the industry growth rate is high, the relative performance evaluation of equity incentive contracts has a more significant role in promoting corporate risk-taking. The results are robust for alternative measures of risk-taking and instrumental variable estimation. Mechanism analysis shows that industry growth increases the incentive for managers to take risks to achieve assessment goals by increasing the assessment standards of relative performance evaluation. Further analysis shows that under the conditions of rapid industry growth, the relative performance evaluation promotes risk-taking, which helps enterprises increase R&D investment and improve performance, but has no significant impact on the costs of debt financing and the probability of financial distress. The results of this paper show that the economic environment will affect the incentive effect of performance evaluation methods.

Key words: relative performance evaluation, risk taking, industry growth, equity incentive