管理评论 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 19-30.

• 经济与金融管理 • 上一篇    

区域绿色发展水平的测度及其空间网络结构研究

苏屹1, 樊起铭2   

  1. 1. 哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院, 哈尔滨 150001;
    2. 东北林业大学经济管理学院, 哈尔滨 150040
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-06 发布日期:2025-03-06
  • 作者简介:苏屹,哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士;樊起铭(通讯作者),东北林业大学经济管理学院讲师,硕士生导师,博士。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目(21&ZD122);国家自然科学基金项目(7207405;72474058)。

Measurement of Regional Green Development and Exploration of Its Spatial Network

Su Yi1, Fan Qiming2   

  1. 1. School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001;
    2. College of Economics and Management, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040
  • Received:2021-05-06 Published:2025-03-06

摘要: 基于DPSIR模型构建绿色发展评价指标体系,在测度区域绿色发展水平的基础上,探究其空间网络结构。结果表明:(1)区域间绿色发展并不均衡。各区域绿色发展水平可分为四类:趋于成熟型、快速发展型、逐步推进型、早期成长型。经济发达区域更易通过“响应+驱动”转化为发展优势,而资源依赖型、传统产业密集型区域创新驱动不足,绿色发展受阻。(2)空间网络中,区域间的通达性较强且不存在严格的等级结构,有助于推动区域间合作互补,但网络稳定性较差,尚未形成高质量的区域协作格局。(3)位置因素而非能力因素是区域能否在空间网络中占有重要地位的关键。相较绿色发展水平高的区域,绿色发展水平较低的区域更容易产生溢出效应。研究结果为进一步推动中国高质量绿色发展提供思路:一方面,应注重DPSIR要素的协同发展,打通“政策—响应—驱动力”的转化渠道,挖掘从生产力向“减缓压力—改善状态—绿色福利”的驱动路径,因地制宜探索高质量发展道路;另一方面,打通区域屏障,发挥特定区域纽带作用,发挥绿色先行区域带动作用,加大绿色薄弱区域支持力度,构建绿色低碳高质量发展空间格局,推动区域协调发展。

关键词: 绿色发展, 空间网络, 熵值法, 社会网络分析

Abstract: This paper constructs a green development evaluation index system based on DPSIR model, and explores its spatial network structure on the basis of measuring regional green development level. The results are as follows. (1) Green development is not balanced among regions. The level of green development in each region can be divided into four categories: mature type, rapid development type, gradual promotion type and early growth type. Economically developed regions are more likely to generate development advantages through “response + drive”, while resource-dependent and traditional industry-intensive regions lag behind in green development due to lack of innovation. (2) In the space network, inter-regional connectivity is strong and there is no strict hierarchical structure, which is conducive to promoting inter-regional cooperation and complementarity. However, the stability of the network is weak, and a high-quality regional cooperation pattern has not yet been formed. (3) Location factors, rather than capacity factors, are the key to whether a region can occupy an important position in the space network. Compared with regions at high levels of green development, regions at low levels of green development are more likely to produce spillover effects. The research results provide ideas for further promoting high-quality green development in China. On the one hand, all regions should pay attention to the coordinated development of DPSIR elements, open up the transformation channel of “policy-response-driving force”, excavate the driving path from productivity to “pressure reduction-state improvement-green welfare”, and explore the high-quality development path according to local conditions. On the other hand, it is necessary to break the barriers between regions, give play to the role of specific regional ties, stimulate the leading role of green areas, increase support for weak green areas, build a spatial pattern of green, low-carbon and high-quality development, and promote coordinated regional development.

Key words: green development, spatial network, entropy method, social network analysis