营商环境生态驱动数绿协同创新发展的动态组态效应研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 数绿协同创新是发展新质生产力的核心要素。如何通过优化营商环境生态以驱动数绿协同创新发展是亟须回答的热点议题。本文明确了数绿协同创新的概念内涵和评价方式，并结合制度组态理论与生态系统耦合观，以2011—2021年724家高科技上市企业为样本，采用混合方法探究实现高水平数绿协同创新发展的多元营商环境生态组态路径、演变规律及影响效应。研究发现：①单个营商环境生态要素不是数绿协同创新发展的必要条件。②存在4条驱动数绿协同创新发展的组态路径，即政府赋能-社会主导下的非耦合型（H1）、社会主导下的非耦合型（H2）、政府-社会双元主导下的非耦合型（H3）和政府-市场-社会协同下的松散耦合型（H4），其中，人力资源和创新环境发挥着较为普适的作用。③时间维度上，组态H1、H3和H4呈现明显的平行波动下降趋势。从分布上看，部分高科技企业实现高水平数绿协同创新发展的路径并不唯一。④高水平组态驱动效应显著，且在民营及管理层年轻化的高科技企业中更为明显。本文结果对揭示高水平数绿协同创新发展的营商环境生态路径提供了重要的理论依据和实践参考。

关键词: 数绿协同创新, 营商环境生态, 制度组态, 生态系统耦合观, 混合方法

Abstract: Digital-green synergistic innovation is a core element in the development of new quality productive forces. How to optimize the doing business ecosystems to drive the development of digital-green synergistic innovation is an urgent issue. This paper clarifies the concept and evaluation approach of digital-green synergistic innovation, and integrates institutional configuration theory with the ecological system coupling perspective. Using a sample of 724 listed high-tech companies from 2011 to 2021, this paper employs a mixed-method approach to explore the diverse doing business ecological configuration paths, evolution patterns, and impact effects that drive high-level digital-green synergistic innovation. The findings are as follows: (1) Individual doing business ecological factors do not constitute a necessary condition for the development of digital-green synergistic innovation. (2) Four configuration paths driving digital-green synergistic innovation are identified: government-empowered, socially-led non-coupling (H1), socially-led non-coupling (H2), government-social dual-led non-coupling (H3), and government-market-social collaborative loose coupling (H4), with human resources and innovation environment playing a relatively universal role. (3) From a temporal perspective, configurations H1, H3, and H4 exhibit a clear parallel downward fluctuation trend. Geographically, some high-tech companies achieve high-level digital-green synergistic innovation development through non-unique paths. (4) The driving effects of high-level configurations are significant, particularly in private companies and high-tech companies run by a young management team. The results of this study provide important theoretical foundations and practical references for revealing the doing business ecological paths that drive high-level digital-green synergistic innovation.

Key words: digital-green synergistic innovation, doing business ecosystems, institutional configuration, ecological system coupling perspective, mixed-method approach

田庆锋, 沈伟康, 李瑶. 营商环境生态驱动数绿协同创新发展的动态组态效应研究[J]. 管理评论, 2025, 37(11): 232-244.

Tian Qingfeng, Shen Weikang, Li Yao. Research on Dynamic Configurational Effects of Doing Business Ecosystems Driving Digital-Green Synergistic Innovation[J]. Management Review, 2025, 37(11): 232-244.

参考文献

[1] Nambisan S., Lyytinen K., Majchrzak A., et al. Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2017,41(1):223-238
[2] Yin S., Yu Y. An Adoption-Implementation Framework of Digital Green Knowledge to Improve the Performance of Digital Green Innovation Practices for Industry 5.0[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022,363:132608
[3] Tian Q., Shen W., Wang Y., et al. Mechanism and Evolution Trend of Digital Green Fusion in China’s Regional Advanced Manufacturing Industry[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023,427:139264
[4] 杜运周,刘秋辰,程建青. 什么样的营商环境生态产生城市高创业活跃度?——基于制度组态的分析[J]. 管理世界, 2020,36(9):141-155 Du Y. Z., Liu Q. C., Cheng J. Q. What Kind of Ecosystem for Doing Business will Contribute to City-level High Entrepreneurial Activity? A Research Based on Institutional Configurations[J]. Journal of Management World, 2020,36(9):141-155
[5] 贾建锋,刘伟鹏,杜运周,等. 制度组态视角下绿色技术创新效率提升的多元路径[J]. 南开管理评论, 2024,27(2):51-61 Jia J. F., Liu W. P., Du Y. Z., et al. Multiple Paths for Improving Green Technology Innovation Efficiency from the Perspective of Institutional Configuration[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2024,27(2):51-61
[6] 杜运周,孙宁,刘秋辰. 运用混合方法发展和分析复杂中介模型——以营商环境促进创新活力，协同新质生产力和“就业优先”为例[J]. 管理世界, 2024,40(6):217-237 Du Y. Z., Sun N., Liu Q. C. Developing and Analyzing Complex Mediation Models Using Mixed Methods: An Illustration of Doing Business Promoting Innovation Vitality, Synergizing New Quality Productive Forces and Employment-First[J]. Journal of Management World, 2024,40(6):217-237
[7] “中国城市营商环境评价研究”课题组,李志军,张世国,等. 中国城市营商环境评价的理论逻辑、比较分析及对策建议[J]. 管理世界, 2021,37(5):98-112“Research on Evaluation of Doing Business in Chinese Cities” Research Group, Li Z. J., Zhang S. G., et al. Theoretical Logic, Comparative Analysis, and the Countermeasures of Doing Business Assessment in Chinese Cities[J]. Journal of Management World, 2021,37(5):98-112
[8] 刘家国,武娟娟,吴志鹏. “一带一路”沿线中国港口城市营商环境评价及对策研究[J]. 管理评论, 2024,36(11):26-37 Liu J. G., Wu J. J., Wu Z. P. Evaluation of the Business Environment and Countermeasures Research—Evidence from China’s Port Cities along the Belt and Road[J]. Management Review, 2024,36(11):26-37
[9] 步晓宁,郝月,张垣浩,等. 绿色供应链管理的绿色创新效应研究[J]. 经济学动态, 2025,(7):174-191 Bu X. N., Hao Y., Zhang Y. H., et al. The Green Innovation Effects of Green Supply Chain Management[J]. Economic Perspectives, 2025,(7):174-191
[10] 刘姝伶,苏涛永,张鹏. 知识搜索及其双元性对专精特新“小巨人”企业数字创新的影响研究[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2025，37（4）：36-48 Liu S. L., Su T. Y., Zhang P. The Impact of Knowledge Search and Its Ambidexterity on “Little Giant” Firms’ Digital Innovation[J]. R&D Management, 2025，37（4）：36-48
[11] 吾买尔江·艾山,秦洋,彭朝辉. 共同富裕视角下企业数字化与绿色化的协同关系研究[J/OL]. 软科学, 2024：1-10. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/51.1268.g3.20240506.1923.004.html Wu M. J. A., Qin Y., Peng C. H. Synergistic Relationship between Enterprise Digitalization and Greening from the Common Prosperity Perspective[J/OL]. Soft Science, 2024:1-10. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/51.1268.g3.20240506.1923.004.html
[12] 赵佳丽,张晓雅. 中部地区城市数字化与绿色化协同发展演化与驱动因素分析[J]. 科学决策, 2024,(6):32-50 Zhao J. L., Zhang X. Y. Research on the Evolutionary Characteristics and Influencing Factors of the Coordinated Development of Digitalization and Greening in the Central Region of China[J]. Scientific Decision Making, 2024,(6):32-50
[13] 杜运周,刘秋辰,陈凯薇,等. 营商环境生态、全要素生产率与城市高质量发展的多元模式——基于复杂系统观的组态分析[J]. 管理世界, 2022,38(9):127-145 Du Y. Z., Liu Q. C., Chen K. W., et al. Ecosystem of Doing Business, Total Factor Productivity and Multiple Patterns of High-quality Development of Chinese Cities: A Configuration Analysis Based on Complex Systems View[J]. Journal of Management World, 2022,38(9):127-145
[14] 陶锋,翟少轩,王峤. 数字经济政策与传统企业跨界数字创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2025,(2):118-136 Tao F., Zhai S. X., Wang Q. Digital Economy Policies and Cross-boundary Digital Innovation of Traditional Enterprises[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2025,(2):118-136
[15] 陈雨露,蓝焕琪,马勇. 金融创新、金融结构与企业创新[J]. 经济研究, 2025,60(3):38-53 Chen Y. L., Lan H. Q., Ma Y. Financial Innovation, Financial Structure and Corporate Innovation[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2025,60(3):38-53
[16] 蒋伟杰,单亦轲. 市场可达性对企业异地合作创新的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2025,46(2):139-148 Jiang W. J., Shan Y. K. Impact of Market Accessibility on the Inter-Regional Collaborative Innovation of Enterprises[J]. Science Research Management, 2025,46(2):139-148
[17] 杜运周,李佳馨,刘秋辰,等. 复杂动态视角下的组态理论与QCA方法:研究进展与未来方向[J]. 管理世界, 2021,37(3):180-197 Du Y. Z., Li J. X., Liu Q. C., et al. Configurational Theory and QCA Method from a Complex Dynamic Perspective: Research Progress and Future Directions[J]. Journal of Management World, 2021,37(3):180-197
[18] 李佳雪,王伟楠,王毅,等. 实现区域技术市场发展的多元营商环境组态研究——基于31个省份的定性比较分析[J]. 管理评论, 2024,36(6):133-145 Li J. X., Wang W. N., Wang Y., et al. Research on Diversified Business Environment Configuration for Technology Market Development: Based on Qualitative Comparative Analysis of 31 Provinces[J]. Management Review, 2024,36(6):133-145
[19] 邢青松,任阳阳,邓富民. 最小出货量保证下绿色产品协同创新收益分配决策[J]. 管理评论, 2024,36(2):80-91 Xing Q. S., Ren Y. Y., Deng F. M. Profit Distribution Decision for Collaborative Innovation of Green Product under the Guarantee of Minimum Shipment[J]. Management Review, 2024,36(2):80-91
[20] Yuan S., Pan X. Inherent Mechanism of Digital Technology Application Empowered Corporate Green Innovation: Based on Resource Allocation Perspective[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2023,345:118841
[21] 肖静,曾萍. 数字化能否实现企业绿色创新的“提质增量”?——基于资源视角[J]. 科学学研究, 2023,41(5):925-935 Xiao J., Zeng P. Does Digitalization Improve the Quality and Quantity of Enterprise Green Innovation?—Based on Resource Perspective[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2023,41(5):925-935
[22] 刘畅,潘慧峰,李珮,等. 数字化转型对制造业企业绿色创新效率的影响和机制研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2023,(4):121-129 Liu C., Pan H. F., Li P., et al. Impact and Mechanism of Digital Transformation on the Green Innovation Efficiency of Manufacturing Enterprises in China[J]. China Soft Science, 2023,(4):121-129
[23] 宋华,韩梦玮,于亢亢,等. 数字技术如何助力供应链碳减排——基于国网浙江电力的案例研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2024,27(1):27-41 Song H., Han M. W., Yu K. K., et al. How does Digital Technology Promote Supply Chain Carbon Emission Reduction? A Case Study Based on State Grid Zhejiang Electric Power Co., Ltd.[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2024,27(1):27-41
[24] Chen W. Can Low-carbon Development Force Enterprises to Make Digital Transformation?[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2023,32(4):1292-1307
[25] Zhao S., Zhang L., An H., et al. Has China’s Low-carbon Strategy Pushed Forward the Digital Transformation of Manufacturing Enterprises? Evidence from the Low-carbon City Pilot Policy[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2023,102:107184
[26] Qu Z., He Z. Carbon Information Disclosure as a Driving Force for Corporate Digital Transformation: A Textual Analysis from China[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2025,27(9):21567-21592
[27] 李晓娣,原媛. 营商环境生态驱动制造业智能化的组态路径研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2024,42(4):746-756 Li X. D., Yuan Y. Research on the Configuration Path of Manufacturing Intelligentization Driven by Ecosystem of Doing Business[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2024,42(4):746-756
[28] 宋清,刘奕惠. 市场竞争程度、研发投入和中小科技企业创新产出——基于风险投资调节的条件过程分析[J]. 中国软科学, 2021,(10):182-192 Song Q., Liu Y. H. Market Competition, R&D Investment and Innovation Output of Technology-Based SMEs: Conditional Process Analysis Based on the Moderating Effect of Venture Capital Investments[J]. China Soft Science, 2021,(10):182-192
[29] 代中强,孙全刚. 知识产权保护的区域合作及其创新激励效应[J]. 经济管理, 2025,47(1):87-107 Dai Z. Q., Sun Q. G. The Regional Cooperation in Intellectual Property Protection and Its Innovative Incentive Effects[J]. Business and Management Journal, 2025,47(1):87-107
[30] 曾宪聚,严江兵,周南. 深圳优化营商环境的实践经验和理论启示:制度逻辑与制度融贯性的视角[J]. 经济体制改革, 2019,(2):5-12 Zeng X. J., Yan J. B., Zhou N. Practical Experience and Theoretical Enlightenment of Optimizing Business Environment in Shenzhen: The Perspective of Institutional Logic and Institutional Coherence[J]. Reform of Economic System, 2019,(2):5-12
[31] 裴秋亚,范黎波. 什么样的制度环境更利于数字经济产业发展?——基于多元制度逻辑的组态分析[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2022,43(10):38-52 Pei Q. Y., Fan L. B. What Kind of Institutional Environment Is More Conducive to Development of Digital Economy Industry?—Configuration Analysis Based on Pluralistic Institutional Logic[J]. Research on Economics and Management, 2022,43(10):38-52
[32] 杜运周,尤树洋. 制度逻辑与制度多元性研究前沿探析与未来研究展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2013,35(12):2-10 Du Y. Z., You S. Y. Analysis of the Frontier of Institutional Logic and Institutional Pluralism Research and Prospects for Further Research[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2013,35(12):2-10
[33] 张吉昌,龙静,王泽民. 制度组态视角下数字生态激发创业活跃度的多元路径——基于NCA与fsQCA的研究[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2024,36(2):113-124 Zhang J. C., Long J., Wang Z. M. Multiple Paths for Improving Entrepreneurial Activity in Digital Ecology from the Perspective of Institutional Configuration—A Study Based on NCA and fsQCA[J]. R&D Management, 2024,36(2):113-124
[34] 徐君,陈圣武,朱微笑. 新型工业化与新质生产力耦合协调度:分布特征、空间差异及演进预测[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2025,46(9):76-92 Xu J., Chen S. W., Zhu W. X. Distribution Characteristics, Spatial Differences and Evolution Prediction of Coupling Coordination Degree of New Industrialization and New Quality Productivity[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 2025,46(9):76-92
[35] 张三保,张志学,黄敏学. 中国城市营商环境数据库2023[DB/OL]. http://jszy.whu.edu.cn/zhang/zh_CN/zzcg/416874/content/6027.htm#zzcg, 2023 Zhang S. B., Zhang Z. X., Huang M. X. China Urban Business Environment Database 2023[DB/OL]. http://jszy.whu.edu.cn/zhang/zh_CN/zzcg/416874/content/6027.htm#zzcg, 2023
[36] 杨兴哲,周翔翼. 治理效应抑或融资效应?股票流动性对上市公司避税行为的影响[J]. 会计研究, 2020,(9):120-133 Yang X. Z., Zhou X. Y. Easing the Financial Constraints or Strengthening Governance? The Impact of Stock Liquidity on Corporate Tax Avoidance[J]. Accounting Research, 2020,(9):120-133
[37] Castro R. G., Ariño M. A. A General Approach to Panel Data Set-Theoretic Research[J]. Journal of Advances in Management Sciences & Information Systems, 2016,2:63-76
[38] 张放. 影响地方政府信息公开的因素——基于省域面板数据的动态QCA分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2023,42(1):133-141 Zhang F. Determinants of Local Governments’ Information Disclosure: A Dynamic QCA Analysis Based on Provincial Panel Data[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2023,42(1):133-141
[39] Du Y., Liu Q., Kim P. H., et al. Riding the Waves of Change: Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis to Analyze Complex Growth Patterns in Entrepreneurship[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2025,49(1):312-353
[40] Du Y., Liu Q., Kim P. H., et al. Studying Complex Causal Processes in Technological Innovation and Entrepreneurship with Set-Theoretic Mediation Models[J]. Technovation, 2024,134:103015