管理评论 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (12): 60-71.

• 数据要素管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

数据守门人:作用职能、系统框架及未来展望

肖玉贤1, 索成1, 张少彤1, 孟庆国1,2,3   

  1. 1. 清华大学公共管理学院, 北京 100084;
    2. 清华大学国家治理研究院, 北京 100084;
    3. 清华大学计算社会科学与国家治理实验室, 北京 100084
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-16 出版日期:2024-12-28 发布日期:2025-01-02
  • 作者简介:肖玉贤,清华大学公共管理学院博士后;索成,清华大学公共管理学院博士研究生;张少彤,清华大学公共管理学院高级工程师;孟庆国,清华大学公共管理学院教授。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(72293571);云南省重大专项(202402AD080003)。

Data Gatekeepers: Functional Role, System Framework and Future Prospects

Xiao Yuxian1, Suo Cheng1, Zhang Shaotong1, Meng Qingguo1,2,3   

  1. 1. School of Public Policy & Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084;
    2. Institute for Governance Studies, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084;
    3. Laboratory of Computational Social Science and State Governance, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084
  • Received:2023-08-16 Online:2024-12-28 Published:2025-01-02

摘要: 数据如何安全高效地流通交易备受各界关注,使得数据守门人成为数据安全管理的新兴参与主体。文章通过回顾传统守门人(gatekeepers)作用职责,结合数据要素属性特征与数据要素化治理经验,明确了数据守门人的职责,主要是在数据资源化、数据产品化、数据流通交易等过程中提供把关服务。借鉴计算机领域微内核构建理念,进一步研究发现:数据守门人类型、职能的多元化带来差异化的服务目标。在内核的核心模块,面向多方权益保护、数据规模化开发、数据市场激活等目标提供专业性把关服务,促进数据增值增益;在内核的周边模块,面向数据有序流转提供共性把关服务,强化数据全生命周期管理。同时,应不断健全服务保障能力,助力由数据守门人互补共创所构成的微内核健康发展,以支撑数据守门人作用充分发挥。我国可进一步推动数据守门人国际化标准构建、清单化管理制度建设、价值共创方案设计、守门绩效循证评估等工作。

关键词: 守门人, 数据商, 第三方专业服务, 系统框架, 数据要素市场生态

Abstract: The issue of how to safely and efficiently circulate and trade data has attracted so much attention that data gatekeepers have become a new type of participants in data security management. The paper systematically reviews the roles and responsibilities of traditional gatekeepers, and based on the combination of data element attributes and data element governance experience, clarifies that data gatekeepers’s main responsibility is to provide gatekeeping services in the processes of data resource utilization, data productization, data circulation and transactions. A further study that draws inspiration from the microkernel construction concept in the field of computer science finds that due to the diverse functions and types of data gatekeepers, they have different service objectives. To be specific, professional gatekeeping services are provided in the core modules of the kernel to protect multi-party rights, realize large scale data development and activate data market vitality, so that higher value and return can be gained from data; common gatekeeping services are provided in the peripheral modules of the kernel to ensure the orderly flow of data, so that data lifecycle management can be strengthened. At the same time, in order to empower the microkernel’s healthy development, service delivery capabilities should be improved in such a manner as to allow full play to data gatekeepers’ working together inter-complementally. At the national level, it is advised to further promote the construction of international certification standards for data gatekeepers, develop inventory management systems, design value co-creation schemes, and implement evidence-based evaluations of gatekeeper performance.

Key words: gatekeeper, data vendor, third party professional service, system framework, data element market ecology