管理评论 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (10): 172-184.

• 组织与战略管理 • 上一篇    

中国电子烟的行业自律行为是否影响了政府政策?

徐艳梅1, 王自强1, 李想2, 宋夏1, 张亚楠1, 白振立1   

  1. 1. 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院, 北京 100190;
    2. 辽宁大学商学院, 辽宁 110136
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-09 发布日期:2024-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 王自强,中国科学院大学经济与管理学院博士研究生。
  • 作者简介:徐艳梅,中国科学院大学经济与管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士;李想,辽宁大学商学院讲师,博士;宋夏,中国科学院大学经济与管理学院博士研究生;张亚楠,中国科学院大学经济与管理学院博士研究生;白振立,中国科学院大学经济与管理学院硕士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重大项目(72192843)。

Has China’s E-cigarette Industry’s Self-regulation Influenced Government Policy?

Xu Yanmei1, Wang Ziqiang1, Li Xiang2, Song Xia1, Zhang Yanan1, Bai Zhenli1   

  1. 1. School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
    2. School of Business, Liaoning University, Liaoning 110136
  • Received:2022-05-09 Published:2024-11-15

摘要: 技术创新在催生了新技术和新产品的同时,也催生出了新的行业,形成了新的企业生态,给政府管理带来新的挑战。电子烟行业是一个鲜为人知的新兴行业,中国在国际上占据优势地位,并经历着类似互联网的“无序发展”的困扰。为了取得更好的生存环境,电子烟行业的企业成员根据行业特质及外部环境,实施并表现出了非同寻常的自律行为,如:自发成立中国电子烟行业委员会,自发将行业委员会挂靠至中国电子商会进行沟通,自发制定行业标准,自发组织与其他国家行业协会联合发表《世界电子烟公共健康安全宣言》,自发开展未成年人保护行动,自发抗疫救灾、捐资捐物等。这种“自下而上”的行业自律,是否影响了政府政策的制定?本文从博弈分析的角度,探讨行业自律对政策规制的影响,并以开放市场、保持竞争、促进技术创新和经济发展、同时行业自律为目标,寻求企业行为决策及政府规制出台策略的优化组合。

关键词: 电子烟行业, 新兴行业, 合法性理论, 行业自律

Abstract: Technological innovation gives birth not only to new technologies and new products, but also to new industries, all of which combine into a new enterprise ecology that is challenging for the government to manage. As a little-known emerging industry, the e-cigarette industry is experiencing “disorderly development” in China, a world leader, just as the Internet once did. In order to achieve a better living environment, enterprises in China’s e-cigarette industry adapt themselves to the industry characteristics and the external environment by implementing and demonstrating extraordinary self-discipline. For example, they spontaneously established China E-cigarette Industry Committee, affiliated the committee to China Electronic Chamber of Commerce for communication, formulated industry standards, worked with industry associations of other countries to issue the Declaration on World E-cigarette Public Health and Safety, take actions to protect minors, and participated in the anti-epidemic initiative by providing relief and donating money and goods. Has this “bottom-up” self-regulation behavior in China’s e-cigarette industry influenced government policy making? From the perspective of game analysis, this paper discusses the influence of industry self-discipline on policy regulation, and seeks an optimal solution for both enterprises’ decision-making and government policy making in order to open the market, maintain competition, promote technological innovation and economic development, and promote industry self-discipline.

Key words: e-cigarette industry, emerging industry, legitimacy theory, industry self-discipline