外部投资者参与创新合作视角下研发补贴的最优边界问题研究

管理评论 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11): 102-112,125.

外部投资者参与创新合作视角下研发补贴的最优边界问题研究

李军强¹, 任浩², 汪明月³

1. 上海财经大学上海发展研究院, 上海 200433;
2. 同济大学经济与管理学院, 上海 200092;
3. 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院, 北京 100190

收稿日期:2021-08-09 出版日期:2023-11-28 发布日期:2023-12-27
通讯作者: 汪明月(通讯作者),中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院副研究员,博士。
作者简介:李军强,上海财经大学上海发展研究院助理研究员,博士;任浩,同济大学经济与管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年基金项目（72204247）；中国博士后科学基金项目（2020M670470；2023M732169）。

The Optimal Boundary of R&D Subsidies for Promoting R&D Cooperation Involving External Investors

Li Junqiang¹, Ren Hao², Wang Mingyue³

1. School of Shanghai Development, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433;
2. School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092;
3. Institute of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190

Received:2021-08-09 Online:2023-11-28 Published:2023-12-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 创新驱动战略实施过程中，提高地方政府研发补贴政策的效力至关重要。本文基于研发补贴对企业产生的双重“认证效应”，构建了地方政府、研发企业和外部投资者之间的随机演化博弈模型。通过模型求解，得出了主体策略演化稳定时研发补贴的有效边界条件。以2019年我国12个省份的601家创业板上市公司数据为样本，选取北京市作为研发补贴政策标杆区域，对其他省份研发补贴的效力进行了横向比较。研究结果表明：地方政府发放的研发补贴对企业和投资者选择研发和投资策略不具有决定性作用，但研发补贴会显著影响两类主体策略选择概率的收敛速度和稳定性；以北京市作为标杆区域进行横向分析时，各省份均存在研发补贴的有效边界，且各省份研发补贴效力呈现方向性差异。三类区域具体如下：第一类如安徽省和四川省，研发补贴缺口大，仍可继续追加；第二类如广东省，其与北京市的研发补贴效力趋近；第三类如湖北省、山东省和河南省，存在研发补贴“冗余”现象。

关键词: 认证效应, 研发补贴, 随机演化博弈

Abstract: In the process of implementing the innovation-driven strategy, it is crucial to improve the effectiveness of R&D subsidies of local governments. Based on the dual "certification effect" of R&D subsidies on firms, this paper proposes a model of stochastic evolutionary game among three participants:local governments, R&D firms and investors. By solving the model, we derive the effective boundary conditions of R&D subsidies during the stable evolution of the participants' strategies. Drawing upon the data of 601 ChiNext listed companies in 12 regions in 2019 with Beijing as the benchmark area for R&D subsidy policies, this paper compares the effectiveness of R&D subsidies in other regions. The results show that:the R&D subsidies issued by the local governments do not play a decisive role in the choice of R&D and investment strategies by enterprises and investors, but will significantly affect the convergence speed and stability of their strategy selection probabilities. Benchmarked against Beijing, other regions show an effective boundary for R&D subsidies, and the effectiveness varies directionally from region to region. To be specific, R&D subsidies are insufficient in regions like Anhui and Sichuan, at the same level as Beijing in regions like Guangdong, and redundant in regions like Hubei, Shandong and Henan.

Key words: certification effect, R&D subsidies, stochastic evolutionary game

李军强, 任浩, 汪明月. 外部投资者参与创新合作视角下研发补贴的最优边界问题研究[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(11): 102-112,125.

Li Junqiang, Ren Hao, Wang Mingyue. The Optimal Boundary of R&D Subsidies for Promoting R&D Cooperation Involving External Investors[J]. Management Review, 2023, 35(11): 102-112,125.

参考文献

[1] Banerjee T., Siebert R. Dynamic Impact of Uncertainty on R&D Cooperation Formation and Research Performance:Evidence from the Bio-pharmaceutical Industry[J]. Research Policy, 2017,46(7):1255-1271
[2] Lu J. W., Beamish P. W. The Internationalization and Performance of SMEs[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001,22(6-7):565-586
[3] 胡善成,靳来群. 政府研发补贴促进了策略创新还是实质创新?——理论模型与实证检验[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2021,33(3):109-120
[4] 张笑,赵明辉,张路蓬. 政府创新补贴、高管关系嵌入与研发决策——WSR方法论视角下制造业上市公司的实证研究[J]. 管理评论, 2021,33(5):194-207
[5] 黎文靖,郑曼妮. 实质性创新还是策略性创新?——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2016,51(4):60-73
[6] Hsu D. H. Venture Capitalists and Cooperative Start-up Commercialization Strategy[J]. Management Science, 2006,52(2):204-219
[7] Heeley M. B., Matusik S. F., Jain N. Innovation, Appropriability, and the Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007,50(1):209-225
[8] Chen J., Heng C. S., Tan B. C. Y., et al. The Distinct Signaling Effects of R&D Subsidy and Non-R&D Subsidy on IPO Performance of IT Entrepreneurial Firms in China[J]. Research Policy, 2018,47(1):108-120
[9] Wu A. The Signal Effect of Government R&D Subsidies in China:Does Ownership Matter?[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017,117:339-345
[10] Encarnação S., Santos F. P., Santos F. C., et al. Paths to the Adoption of Electric Vehicles:An Evolutionary Game Theoretical Approach[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2018,113:24-33
[11] Yang Z., Shi Y., Li Y. Analysis of Intellectual Property Cooperation Behavior and Its Simulation under Two Types of Scenarios Using Evolutionary Game Theory[J]. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2018,125:739-750
[12] Xie H., Wang W., Zhang X. Evolutionary Game and Simulation of Management Strategies of Fallow Cultivated Land:A Case Study in Hunan Province, China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018,71:86-97
[13] Xu Y., Yu B., Wang Y., et al. A Stochastic Evolutionary Game Perspective on the Stability of Strategic Alliances against External Opportunism[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2015,28(4):978-996
[14] 李军强,任浩,甄杰. 基于随机演化博弈的企业研发操纵多重监管路径研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021,29(10):191-201
[15] 张国兴,张绪涛,汪应洛,等. 节能减排政府补贴的最优边界问题研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2014,11(17):129-138
[16] Meuleman M., De Maeseneire W. Do R&D Subsidies Affect SMEs' Access to External Financing?[J]. Research Policy, 2012,41(3):580-591
[17] Feldman M. P., Kelley M. R. The Ex Ante Assessment of Knowledge Spillovers:Government R&D Policy, Economic Incentives and Private Firm Behavior[J]. Research Policy, 2006,35(10):1509-1521
[18] Cumming D. Government Policy towards Entrepreneurial Finance:Innovation Investment Funds[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2007,22(2):193-235
[19] Li J., Lee R. P., Wan J. Indirect Effects of Direct Subsidies:An Examination of Signaling Effects[J]. Industry and Innovation, 2020,27(9):1040-1061
[20] Dai X., Li Y., Chen K. Direct Demand-pull and Indirect Certification Effects of Public Procurement for Innovation[J]. Technovation, 2021,101(18):102198
[21] Silva F., Carreira C. Financial Constraints:Do They Matter to Allocate R&D Subsidies?[J]. B E Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 2017,17(4):1-26
[22] Chan L. K. C., Lakonishok J., Sougiannis T. The Stock Market Valuation of Research and Development Expenditures[J]. Journal of Finance, 2001,56(6):2431-2456
[23] Martínez-Noya A., Narula R. What More can We Learn from R&D Alliances? A Review and Research Agenda[J]. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 2018,21(3):195-212
[24] Nicholson S., Danzon P. M., McCullough J. Biotech-pharmaceutical Alliances as a Signal of Asset and Firm Quality[J]. Journal of Business, 2005,78(4):1433-1464
[25] Anand B. N., Khanna T. Do Firms Learn to Create Value? The Case of Alliances[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000,21(3):295-315
[26] Hoenig D., Henkel J. Quality Signals? The Role of Patents, Alliances, and Team Experience in Venture Capital Financing[J]. Research Policy, 2015,44(5):1049-1064
[27] Chou T., Ou C., Tsai S. Value of Strategic Alliances:Evidence from the Bond Market[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2014,42(1):42-59
[28] Stuart T. E. Network Positions and Propensities to Collaborate:An Investigation of Strategic Alliance Formation in a High-technology Industry[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1998,43(3):668-698
[29] Boeing P. The Allocation and Effectiveness of China's R&D Subsidies:Evidence from Listed Firms[J]. Research Policy, 2016,45(9):1774-1789
[30] David P. A., Hall B. H., Toole A. A. Is Public R&D a Complement or Substitute for Private R&D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence[J]. Research Policy, 2000,29(4-5):497-529
[31] Dimos C., Pugh G. The Effectiveness of R&D Subsidies:A Meta-regression Analysis of the Evaluation Literature[J]. Research Policy, 2016,45(4):797-815
[32] Görg H., Strobl E. The Effect of R&D Subsidies on Private R&D[J]. Economica, 2007,74(294):215-234
[33] Guellec D., Potterie B. V. P. D. La. The Impact of Public R&D Expenditure on Business R&D[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2003,12(3):225-243
[34] 吴伟伟,张天一. 非研发补贴与研发补贴对新创企业创新产出的非对称影响研究[J]. 管理世界, 2021,37(3):137-159
[35] 伍健,田志龙,龙晓枫,等. 战略性新兴产业中政府补贴对企业创新的影响[J]. 科学学研究, 2018,36(1):158-166
[36] Bird R. B., Smith E. A. Signaling Theory, Strategic Interaction, and Symbolic Capital[J]. Current Anthropology, 2005,46(2):221-248
[37] Takalo T., Tanayama T. Adverse Selection and Financing of Innovation:Is There a Need for R&D Subsidies?[J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2010,35(1):16-41
[38] 马文聪,叶阳平,李小转,等. 政府科技资助对企业研发产出的影响——基于我国大中型工业企业的实证研究[J]. 管理评论, 2019,31(11):94-107
[39] Szücs F. Do Research Subsidies Crowd out Private R&D of Large Firms? Evidence from European Framework Programmes[J]. Research Policy, 2020,49(3):103923
[40] 章元,程郁,佘国满. 政府补贴能否促进高新技术企业的自主创新?——来自中关村的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018,(10):123-140
[41] 白旭云,王砚羽,苏欣. 研发补贴还是税收激励——政府干预对企业创新绩效和创新质量的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2021,40(6):9-18
[42] Okamuro H., Kato M., Honjo Y. Determinants of R&D Cooperation in Japanese Start-ups[J]. Research Policy, 2011,40(5):728-738
[43] 孙华丽,王循庆,薛耀锋. 基于不同情景的群体性突发事件随机演化博弈模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2016,25(4):23-30
[44] 徐岩,胡斌,钱任. 基于随机演化博弈的战略联盟稳定性分析和仿真[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2011,31(5):920-926
[45] Xu X., Liang Y., Song S. What Drives Mergers & acquisitions Waves of Listed Companies of the ChiNext Market? IPO Over-financing or Stock Overvaluation[J]. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 2018,24(4):1499-1532
[46] Alam A., Uddin M., Yazdifar H. Financing Behaviour of R&D Investment in the Emerging Markets:The Role of Alliance and Financial System[J]. R&D Management, 2019,49(1):21-32