管理评论 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 124-135.

• 技术与创新管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

冗余资源对绿色创新模式选择的影响:环境规制的整合视角

曹翠珍1, 冯娇龙2   

  1. 1. 山西财经大学工商管理学院, 太原 030031;
    2. 北京沃尔玛百货有限公司, 北京 100000
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-17 出版日期:2022-05-28 发布日期:2022-06-17
  • 作者简介:曹翠珍,山西财经大学工商管理学院教授,博士;冯娇龙,北京沃尔玛百货有限公司宣武门分店主管,硕士。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(17YJA630004);国家自然科学基金项目(71774105)。

The Influence of Slack Resources on the Choice of Green Innovation Mode: An Integrated View of Environmental Regulations

Cao Cuizhen1, Feng Jiaolong2   

  1. 1. Faculty of Business Administration, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030031;
    2. Beijing Wal-Mart Stores Company Limited, Beijing 100000
  • Received:2020-06-17 Online:2022-05-28 Published:2022-06-17

摘要: 冗余资源为企业绿色创新带来积极影响的同时也会产生消极作用,但鲜有研究同时聚焦于二者。本文分析了不同类型的冗余资源对绿色创新模式选择的双重影响机制,并从命令控制型和市场激励型规制两个层次,进一步论证了环境规制对于冗余资源和绿色创新之间关系的调节作用。来自中国制造企业调查数据的实证检验发现:(1)已吸收冗余资源对于两种绿色创新都具有消极影响,而未吸收冗余资源对于企业绿色协同式创新具有积极作用,但对于绿色平衡式创新具有消极作用。(2)过于严苛的命令型环境规制会强化冗余资源与绿色创新的负相关关系;相反,市场激励型环境规制会逆转未吸收冗余资源对于绿色平衡式创新的负向影响。(3)市场激励型环境规制也会明显弱化已吸收冗余资源对于绿色协同式创新的负向影响,在高市场激励型规制下,虽然正向效应不明显,但是已经大大削弱了消极负面的影响。(4)两类环境规制在未吸收冗余资源和绿色协同式创新之间的正向关系中都具有强化的调节效应。

关键词: 冗余资源, 绿色平衡式创新, 绿色协同式创新, 环境规制

Abstract: Slack resources have both positive and negative effects on green innovation, but few studies focus on both of them. This paper first analyzes the mechanism of how different types of resources exert dual influence on green innovation ambidexterity, and further demonstrates the moderating effect of environmental regulation on the relationship between slack resources and green innovation ambidexterity at the two levels of command-and-control regulation and market incentive regulation. And then this paper performs an empirical test with the survey data from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. The main findings are as follows:(1) The absorbed slack has a negative effect on green innovation ambidexterity, while unabsorbed slack has a positive effect on green collaborative innovation, but has a negative impact on green balanced innovation. (2) Strict command-based environmental regulations will intensify the negative impact of slack resources on green innovation ambidexterity, while market-based incentive environmental regulation will reverse the negative relationship between unabsorbed slack and green balance innovation. (3) Although absorbed slack will not have a positive effect on green collaborative innovation with the context of high market-based incentive environmental regulation, market-based incentive environmental regulation will significantly weaken the negative relationship between the absorbed slack and green collaborative innovation. (4) Both of the two types of environmental regulations have positive moderating effect between unabsorbed slack and green collaborative innovation. The stronger the environmental regulations become, the stronger the positive relationship between unabsorbed slack and green collaborative innovation becomes.

Key words: slack resources, green balanced innovation, green collaborative innovation, environmental regulations