[1] Teece D. J. Profiting from Technological Innovation:Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy[J]. Research Policy, 1986,15(6):285-305 [2] Christensen C. M. The Innovator's Dilemma:When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail[M]. Cambridge:Harvard Business School Press, 1997 [3] Gilbert C. G. Unbundling the Structure of Inertia:Resource Versus Routine Rigidity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005,48(5):741-763 [4] Helfat C. E., Raubitschek R. S. Dynamic and Integrative Capabilities for Profiting from Innovation in Digital Platform-Based Ecosystems[J]. Research Policy, 2018,47(8):1391-1399 [5] Roy R., Cohen S. K. Stock of Downstream Complementary Assets as a Catalyst for Product Innovation During Technological Change in the U.S. Machine Tool Industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2017,38(6):1253-1267 [6] Miao Y., Song J., Lee K., et al. Technological Catch-up by East Asian Firms:Trends, Issues, and Future Research Agenda[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2018,35(3):639-669 [7] 刘海兵,杨磊,许庆瑞. 后发企业技术创新能力路径如何演化?——基于华为公司1987-2018年的纵向案例研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2020,38(6):1096-1107 [8] Teece D. J. Profiting from Innovation in the Digital Economy:Enabling Technologies, Standards, and Licensing Models in the Wireless World[J]. Research Policy, 2018,47(8):1367-1387 [9] Wu B., Wan Z., Levinthal D. A. Complementary Assets as Pipes and Prisms:Innovation Incentives and Trajectory Choices[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2014,35(9):1257-1278 [10] Tripsas M. Unraveling the Process of Creative Destruction:Complementary Assets and Incumbent Survival in the Typesetter Industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997,18(Summer Special Issue):119-142 [11] Raffaelli R. Technology Reemergence:Creating New Value for Old Technologies in Swiss Mechanical Watchmaking, 1970-2008[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2019,64(3):576-618 [12] Vanacker T., Collewaert V., Zahra S. A. Slack Resources, Firm Performance, and the Institutional Context:Evidence from Privately Held European Firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2017,38(6):1305-1326 [13] Cozzolino A., Rothaermel F. T. Discontinuities, Competition, and Cooperation:Coopetitive Dynamics between Incumbents and Entrants[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2018,39(12):3053-3085 [14] Eggers J. P, Park K. F. Incumbent Adaptation to Technological Change:The Past, Present, and Future of Research on Heterogeneous Incumbent Response[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2018,12(1):357-389 [15] Gao X. A Latecomer's Strategy to Promote a Technology Standard:The Case of Datang and Td-Scdma[J]. Research Policy, 2014,43(3):597-607 [16] 吴先明,高厚宾,邵福泽. 当后发企业接近技术创新的前沿:国际化的"跳板作用"[J]. 管理评论, 2018,30(6):40-54 [17] Eisenhardt K. M., Graebner M. E. Theory Building from Cases:Opportunities and Challenges[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007,50(1):25-32 [18] 彭新敏,郑素丽,吴晓波,等. 后发企业如何从追赶到前沿?——双元性学习的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2017,(2):142-158 [19] Strauss A. L., Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research:Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques[M]. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage, 1990 [20] 彭新敏,吴晓波,吴东. 基于二次创新动态过程的企业网络与组织学习平衡模式演化——海天1971~2010年纵向案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2011,(4):138-149 [21] 吴晓波,余璐,雷李楠. 超越追赶:范式转变期的创新战略[J]. 管理工程学报, 2020,34(1):1-8 [22] 晏梦灵,董小英,胡燕妮. 组织从低端到高端的战略更新机理:基于间断平衡与双元能力理论的案例研究[J]. 管理评论, 2020,32(4):310-324 [23] 宋燕飞,邵鲁宁,尤建新. 互补性资产视角下的电动汽车企业生态位评价研究[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(9):108-119 [24] Cohen S. L., Tripsas M. Managing Technological Transitions by Building Bridges[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2018,61(6):2319-2342 [25] 欧阳桃花,王钧,胡京波. 基于互补性资产的软件企业云计算技术变革研究——以中标软件为案例[J]. 管理评论, 2018,30(6):251-264 [26] Dyer J. H., Singh H., Hesterly W. S. The Relational View Revisited:A Dynamic Perspective on Value Creation and Value Capture[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2018,39(12):3140-3162 [27] 彭新敏,张帆. 技术变革、次序双元与后发企业追赶[J]. 科学学研究, 2019,37(11):2016-2025 |