大气污染协同治理能促进污染物减排吗?——基于城市的三重差分研究

›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 286-297.

大气污染协同治理能促进污染物减排吗?——基于城市的三重差分研究

赵志华¹, 吴建南^2,3

1. 西安交通大学公共政策与管理学院, 西安 710049;
2. 上海交通大学中国城市治理研究院, 上海 200030;
3. 上海交通大学国际与公共事务学院, 上海 200030

收稿日期:2018-07-17 出版日期:2020-01-28 发布日期:2020-01-19
通讯作者: 吴建南(通讯作者),上海交通大学国际与公共事务学院特聘教授,博士生导师,博士
作者简介:赵志华,西安交通大学公共政策与管理学院博士研究生;
基金资助:
教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目（17JZD025）；国家自然科学基金面上项目（71573176）。

Can Air Pollution Collaborative Governance Promote Pollutant Emission Reduction?——A Difference-in-Difference-in-Difference Estimation across Cities

Zhao Zhihua¹, Wu Jiannan^2,3

1. School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiao Tong University, Xi'an 710049;
2. China Institute for Urban Governance, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030;
3. School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030

Received:2018-07-17 Online:2020-01-28 Published:2020-01-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

大气污染具有流动性，跨区域特征明显，协同治理至关重要。基于2010-2015年275个城市的面板数据，运用三重差分法（DDD）研究了大气污染协同治理对污染物减排的影响。从全样本分析结果来看，大气污染协同治理降低了工业二氧化硫排放量和工业烟（粉）尘排放量，而此结果并没有通过显著性检验。从子样本分析结果来看，大气污染协同治理显著降低了工业二氧化硫排放量，但对工业烟（粉）尘排放量没有产生显著影响。城市在促进不同污染物减排时存在差异，减排难度较低的污染物往往被优先完成。从时间效应来看，大气污染协同治理对污染物减排的影响存在时滞性，而且这种时滞性在不同污染物减排之间存在差异。

关键词: 大气污染, 协同治理, 政策效果, 三重差分

Abstract:

Air pollution has fluidity, with obvious cross-regional characteristics. Therefore, cooperative governance for air pollution is very important. Based on the panel data of 275 cities in mainland China from 2010-2015, this paper uses Difference-in-Difference-in-Difference (DDD) method to explore the effect of air pollution collaborative governance on the reduction of pollutant emission. The results of the whole sample analysis show that air pollution collaborative governance is negatively related with the emission of industrial sulfur dioxide and indus-trial soot, and this result can not pass the significant test. From the result of subsample analysis, air pollution collaborative governance is significantly negatively related with the emission of industrial sulfur dioxide, but it is not significantly related with the emission of industrial soot. Cities have differences in promoting emission reduction of different pollutants, and the pollutants with lower emission reduction diffi-culty are often given priority to be completed. Seeing from time effect, there is time lag for the influence of air pollution collaborative gov-ernance on the reduction of pollutant emission, and the time lag is different among various pollutants reduction.

Key words: air pollution, collaborative governance, policy effect, Difference-in-Difference-in-Difference(DDD)

赵志华, 吴建南. 大气污染协同治理能促进污染物减排吗?——基于城市的三重差分研究[J]. , 2020, 32(1): 286-297.

Zhao Zhihua, Wu Jiannan. Can Air Pollution Collaborative Governance Promote Pollutant Emission Reduction?——A Difference-in-Difference-in-Difference Estimation across Cities[J]. , 2020, 32(1): 286-297.

参考文献

[1] Zhao L., Li C., Huang R., et al. Harmonizing Model with Transfer Tax on Water Pollution across Regional Boundaries in a China's Lake Basin[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2013,225(2):377-382
[2] 李雪松,孙博文.大气污染治理的经济属性及政策演进:一个分析框架[J].改革, 2014,(4):17-25
[3] Ansell C., Gash A. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2008,18(4):543-571
[4] Emerson K., Nabatchi T., Balogh S. An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2012,22(1):1-29
[5] Biddle J. C., Koontz T. M. Goal Specificity:A Proxy Measure for Improvements in Environmental Outcomes in Collaborative Gov-ernance[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2014,145(12):268-276
[6] Scott T. Does Collaboration Make Any Difference?Linking Collaborative Governance to Environmental Outcomes[J]. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2015,34(3):537-566
[7] Wang H., Zhao L., Xie Y., et al. "APEC blue"——The Effects and Implications of Joint Pollution Prevention and Control Pro-gram[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2016,553:429-438
[8] 杜雯翠,夏永妹.京津冀区域雾霾协同治理措施奏效了吗?——基于双重差分模型的分析[J].当代经济管理, 2018,40(9):53-59
[9] 张国兴,李佳雪,胡毅,等.节能减排科技政策的演变及协同有效性——基于211条节能减排科技政策的研究[J].管理评论, 2017,29(12):72-83
[10] 姜玲,叶选挺,张伟.差异与协同:京津冀及周边地区大气污染治理政策量化研究[J].中国行政管理, 2017,(8):126-132
[11] Kim S. J., Wang R. J. H., Malthouse E. C. The Effects of Adopting and Using a Brand's Mobile Application on Customers' Subsequent Purchase Behavior[J]. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2015,31:28-41
[12] 付明卫,叶静怡,孟俣希,等.国产化率保护对自主创新的影响——来自中国风电制造业的证据[J].经济研究, 2015,50(2):118-131
[13] 张攀.环境约束性目标设置的影响因素与效果评估研究[D].西安交通大学博士学位论文, 2016
[14] Liang J., Langbein L. Performance Management, High-Powered Incentives, and Environmental Policies in China[J]. Interna-tional Public Management Journal, 2015,18(3):346-385
[15] 周志忍,徐艳晴.绩效评估中的博弈行为及其致因研究:国际文献综述[J].中国行政管理, 2014,(11):109-114
[16] Li J. The Paradox of Performance Regimes:Strategic Responses to Target Regimes in Chinese Local Government[J]. Public Ad-ministration, 2015,93(4):1152-1167
[17] O'Toole Jr. L. J., Meier K. J. Public Management, Context, and Performance:In Quest of a More General Theory[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2014,25(1):237-256
[18] Kelman S., Friedman J. N. Performance Improvement and Performance Dysfunction:An Empirical Examination of Distortionary Impacts of the Emergency Room Wait-Time Target in the English National Health Service[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2009,19(4):917-946
[19] Bevan G., Hood C. What's Measured is What Matters:Targets and Gaming in the English Public Health Care System[J]. Pub-lic Administration, 2006,84(3):517-538
[20] Kalgin A. Implementation of Performance Management in Regional Government in Russia:Evidence of Data Manipulation[J]. Public Management Review, 2016,18(1):110-138
[21] 李永亮."新常态"视阈下府际协同治理雾霾的困境与出路[J].中国行政管理, 2015,(9):32-36
[22] Bohte J., Meier K. J. Goal Displacement:Assessing the Motivation for Organizational Cheating[J]. Public Administration Re-view, 2000,60(2):173-182
[23] Hamidullah M. F., Wilkins V. M., Meier K. J. Looking for Their Dick Vermeil:How Prior Performance Influences the Selection Decision[J]. Public Organization Review, 2009,9(1):1-14
[24] Van Dooren W., Bouckaert G., Halligan J. Performance Management in the Public Sector[M]. London:Routledge, 2015
[25] Zhang P., Wu J. Performance-Based or Politic-Related Decomposition of Environmental Targets:A Multilevel Analysis in China[J]. Sustainability, 2018,10(10):3410
[26] Latham G. P., Borgogni L., Petitta L. Goal Setting and Performance Management in the Public Sector[J]. International Public Management Journal, 2008,11(4):385-403
[27] 吴建南,杨宇谦,阎波.政府绩效评价:指标设计与模式构建[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2007,(5):79-85
[28] Ma L. Performance Feedback, Government Goal-setting and Aspiration Level Adaptation:Evidence from Chinese Provinces[J]. Public Administration, 2016,94(2):452-471
[29] 阎波,吴建南.问责、组织政治知觉与印象管理:目标责任考核情境下的实证研究[J].管理评论, 2013,25(11):74-84
[30] Heberer T., Trappel R. Evaluation Processes, Local Cadres'Behavior and Local Development Processes[J]. Journal of Contem-porary China, 2013,22(84):1048-1066
[31] Rothstein B. The Chinese Paradox of High Growth and Low Quality of Government:The Cadre Organization Meets Max Weber[J]. Governance, 2015,28(4):533-548
[32] Jing Y., Cui Y., Li D. The Politics of Performance Measurement in China[J]. Policy and Society, 2015,34(1):49-61
[33] Wu J., Xu M., Zhang P. The Impacts of Governmental Performance Assessment Policy and Citizen Participation on Improving Environmental Performance across Chinese Provinces[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018,184:227-238
[34] Zhang P., Wu J. Impact of Mandatory Targets on PM2.5 Concentration Control in Chinese Cities[J]. Journal of Cleaner Produc-tion, 2018,197:323-331
[35] 夏炎,吴洁.中国碳生产率减排目标分配机制研究——基于不同环境责任界定视角[J].管理评论, 2018,30(5):137-147
[36] Gao J. Performance Measurement and Management in the Public Sector:Some Lessons from Research Evidence[J]. Public Ad-ministration and Development, 2015,35(2):86-96