“多元共治”社区治理中的网络结构、关系质量与治理效果——以深圳市龙岗区为例

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

社区“多元共治”是国家治理体系与治理能力现代化的重要基层体现，是社区多元力量的有机整合而非机械限定与简单叠加，其本质是多治理主体间互动有序、合作充分的集体行动网络的构建。因此，如何配置结构适当、关系良好的社区多元共治网络就成为了当前社区治理创新的关键。通过构建包含网络结构、关系质量两个维度的社区多元共治效果影响因素框架，探讨三者间的联合作用机制而非一对一的二元相关，以期回应当前相关研究的碎片化与结论不稳定问题，并为有效社区多元共治网络的构建提供系统指导。研究发现：关系质量是网络结构与治理效果间的重要中介。决定社区多元治理主体联结形态的网络结构应当是动态发展的，只有与具体关系质量状况相适配的网络结构才是能带来良好社区多元共治效果的“优质结构”，而社区治理的具体情境将对二者间的适配性产生重要影响。

关键词: 社区治理, 多元共治, 网络结构, 关系质量, 治理效果

Abstract:

Community multi-governance is an important embodiment of modernization of national governance system and capacity in basic level, which means the organic integration of community multi-forces rather than restricting and jointing them mechanically. Its essence is the construction of collective action network, which has orderly interaction and sufficient cooperation among multi-subjects. Therefore, how to configure the community multi-governance network with appropriate structure and well relationship has become the key to community governance innovation. Through building an influencing factors framework of governance effectiveness in community multiple-governance network, which includes two aspects:network structure and relationship quality, we explore the combined mechanism among above three factors, rather than one-to-one binary correlation, in response to the fragmentation and conclusion instability in current researches and provide systematic suggestions for constructing the effective community multi-governance network. The result suggests that relationship quality is an important intermediary between network structure and governance effectiveness. It means that the network structure, which decides multi-actors' relative position and relational form should be dynamic. Only the network structure that matches the specific situation of relationship quality is the "excellent structure", which will bring the great effectiveness of community multi-governance. In addition, the specific community situation may have important impacts on the adaptation between relationship quality and network structure.

Key words: community governance, multi-governance, network structure, relationship quality, governance effectiveness

刘波, 方奕华, 彭瑾. “多元共治”社区治理中的网络结构、关系质量与治理效果——以深圳市龙岗区为例[J]. , 2019, 31(9): 278-290.

Liu Bo, Fang Yihua, Peng Jin. Network Structure, Relationship Quality and Governance Effectiveness in Community Multiple-governance——A Case Study in Longgang District of Shenzhen[J]. , 2019, 31(9): 278-290.

参考文献

[1] 赵孟营.城市社区治理现代化:关系论的视角[J].中国特色社会主义研究, 2017,23(2):80-86
[2] 陈文玲,原珂.基于社区应急救援视角下的共同体意识重塑与弹性社区培育——以F市C社区为例[J].管理评论, 2016,28(8):215-224
[3] 邹劲松.公共租赁住房社区治理机制研究[J].管理评论, 2017,29(3):231-241
[4] 赵岩,孙涛.国内社区治理研究知识图谱分析:基于CSSCI论文(2005-2015)[J].中国行政管理, 2016,32(5):32-37
[5] 林磊.我国社区治理研究范式的演进与转换——基于近十年来相关文献的回顾与述评[J].学习与实践, 2017,34(7):80-87
[6] 张雷.构建基于社区治理理念的居民自治新体系[J].政治学研究, 2018,34(1):99-102
[7] 张文龙.城市社区治理模式选择:谁的治理,何种法治化——基于深圳南山社区治理创新的考察[J].河北法学, 2018,36(9):3-22
[8] 骆小平.多主体社区治理及其思考——以北京、广州、杭州三地调研为基础[J].华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2018,33(3):98-107
[9] Boons F., Berends M. Stretching the Boundary:The Possibilities of Flexibility as an Organizational Capability in Industrial Ecology[J]. Business Strategy&the Environment, 2010,10(2):115-124
[10] 马捷,锁利铭.区域水资源共享冲突的网络治理模式创新[J].公共管理学报, 2010,7(2):107-114
[11] Siddiki S., Kim J., Leach W. D. Diversity, Trust, and Social Learning in Collaborative Governance[J]. Public Administration Review, 2017,77(2):863-874
[12] Shrestha M. K. Self-Organizing Network Capital and the Success of Collaborative Public Programs[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2013,23(2):307-329
[13] Elke S., Carolin D., Frank L. I. Networks of Clusters:A Governance Perspective[J]. Industry and Innovation, 2013,20(4):357-377
[14] Goldsmith S., Eggers W. D. Governing by Network:The New Shape of the Public Sector[M]. New York:Brookings Institution Press, 2004
[15] 唐杰,王红扬."项目指导型"社区治理机制及效应——以南京市景明佳园社区为例[J].城市问题, 2018,37(2):84-89
[16] 王木森.社区治理:理论渊源、发展特征与创新走向——基于我国社区治理研究文献的分析[J].理论月刊, 2017,39(9):151-157
[17] Jorg S., Arnold W. Organizing and Evaluating Interfirm Netwroks:A Structurationist Perspective on Network Process and Effectiveness[J]. Organization Science, 1998,9(3):265-284
[18] Geringer J. M., Hebert L. Measuring Performance of International Joint Ventures[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 1991,22(2):249-263
[19] Provan K. G., Milward H. B. Do Networks Really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public-Sector Organizational Networks[J]. Public Administration Review, 2001,61(4):414-423
[20] 王江伟.中国社区治理创新的特征、动因与绩效——基于"中国社区治理创新成果"的多案例分析[J].求实, 2017,59(12):61-73
[21] Provan K. G., Milward H. B. A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness:A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1995,40(1):1-33
[22] Le R. K., Carr J. B. Prospects for Centralizing Services in an Urban County:Evidence from Eight Self-organized Networks of Local Public Services[J]. Journal of Urban Affairs, 2010,32(4):449-470
[23] Wang W. Exploring the Determinants of Network Effectiveness:The Case of Neighborhood Governance Networks in Beijing[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research Theory, 2016,26(2):17-47
[24] Lemay E. P., Venaglia R. B. Relationship Expectations and Relationship Quality[J]. Review of General Psychology, 2016,20(1):57-70
[25] Park H. H., Rethemeyer R. K. The Politics of Connections:Assessing the Determinants of Social Structure in Policy Networks[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2014,24(2):1-6
[26] Klijn E. H., Sierra V., Ysa T., et al. The Influence of Trust on Network Performance in Taiwan, Spain, and the Netherlands:A Cross-Country Comparison[J]. International Public Management Journal, 2016,19(1):111-139
[27] Alexander J. A., Comfort M. E., Weiner B. J. Governance in Public-Private Community Health Partnerships:A Survey of the Community Care Network Demonstration Sites[J]. Nonprofit Management&Leadership, 1998,8(4):311-332
[28] Pope J., Lewis J. M. Improving Partnership Governance:Using a Network Approach to Evaluate Partnerships in Victoria[J]. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 2010,67(4):443-456
[29] Parag Y., Hamilton J., White V., et al. Network Approach for Local and Community Governance of Energy:The Case of Oxford Shire[J]. Energy Policy, 2013,62(5):1064-1077
[30] Granovetter M. S. The Strength of Weak Ties[J]. American Journal of Sociology,1973(78):1360-1380
[31] Vidovich L., Currie J. Governance Networks:Interlocking Directorships of Corporate and Nonprofit Boards[J]. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 2012(22):7-23
[32] Provan K. G., Kenis P. Modes of Network Governance:Structure Management and Effectiveness[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research Theory, 2008,18(2):229-252
[33] 邓娇娇,严玲,吴绍艳.中国情境下公共项目关系治理的研究:内涵、结构与量表[J].管理评论, 2015,27(8):213-222
[34] Hu Q., Khosa S., Kapucu N. The Intellectual Structure of Empirical Network Research in Public Administration[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research&Theory, 2015,26(4):481-503
[35] Burt R. S. Structural Holes:The Social Structure of Competition[M]. Cambridge M A:Harvard University Press, 1992
[36] Burt R. S., Hogarth R. M., Michaud C. The Social Capital of French and American Managers[J]. Organization Science, 2000,11(2):123-147
[37] Inkpen A. C., Tsang E. W. K. Social Capital Networks and Knowledge Transfer[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2005,30(1):146-165
[38] Anderson J. C., Narus J. A., Van R. W. Customer Value Propositions in Business Markets[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2006,84(3):90-99
[39] Zaheer A., Venkatraman N. Relational Governance as an Interorganizational Strategy:An Empirical Test of the Role of Trust in Economic Exchange[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1995,16(5):373-392
[40] Mohr J., Spekman R. Characteristics of Partnership Success:Partnership Attributes, Communication Behavior and Conflict Resolution Technique[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1994,15(2):135-152
[41] Barclay S. The Effects of Organizational Differences and Trust on the Effectiveness of Selling Partner Relationships[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1997,61(1):3-21
[42] Zaheer A., Mcevily B., Perrone V. Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effects of Interorganizational and Interpersonal Trust on Performance[J]. Organization Science, 1998,9(2):141-159
[43] Tsai W., Ghoshal S. Social Capital and Value Creation:The Role of Intrafirm Networks[J]. Academy of Management, 1998,23(6):162-170
[44] Powell W. W., Koput K. W., Smith D. L. Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation:Networks of Learning in Biotechnology[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996,41(1):116-145
[45] Hardy C., Phillips N., Lawrence T. B. Resources Knowledge and Influence:The Organization Effects of Interorganizational Collaboration[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2003,40(2):321-347
[46] Simon H. A. The Architecture of Complexity[J]. IEEE Control Systems, 1962,106(6):467-482
[47] Weick K. E. Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1976,21(1):178-201
[48] Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R. The External Control of Organizations:A Resource Dependence Perspective[M]. Stanford CA:Stanford University Press, 1978
[49] Provan K. G., Huang K., Milward H. B. The Evolution of Structural Embeddedness and Organizational Social Outcomes in a Centrally Governed Health and Human Services Network[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2009,19(4):873-893
[50] Zeng F., Chen Y., Dong M. C., et al. Understanding Distributor Opportunism in a Horizontal Network[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2015,46(3):171-182