管理评论

›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (8): 90-101.

• 技术与创新管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于跨层级视角的网络惯例治理机理研究

肖瑶1, 党兴华2   

  1. 1. 浙江工商大学工商管理学院, 杭州 310018;
    2. 西安理工大学经济与管理学院, 西安 710054
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-11 出版日期:2018-08-28 发布日期:2018-08-31
  • 通讯作者: 肖瑶(通讯作者),浙江工商大学工商管理学院讲师,博士
  • 作者简介:党兴华,西安理工大学经济与管理学院教授,博士生导师。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目（71372171；71402137）；陕西省重点学科建设基金项目（105-7075x1301）。

Study on Network Routine of Governance Mechanisms Based on Cross-Level

Xiao Yao1, Dang Xinghua2   

  1. 1. School of Management, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018;
    2. School of Economics and Management, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710054
  • Received:2015-12-11 Online:2018-08-28 Published:2018-08-31

PDF (PC)

448

摘要：

技术创新网络惯例是维持网络稳定及促进网络中知识信息流畅运行的核心问题，但现有文献在研究其与治理机制间相互作用的治理机理方面相对缺乏。文章基于治理机制中核心要素并从跨层级视角出发，将创新网络分为网络层级、二元层级及企业层级，并运用HLM分析方法研究位于不同层级惯例与结构机制、关系机制、学习机制自上而下的影响作用。结果表明，网络结构机制中宏观文化在网络层惯例与互惠规范间中介作用更强，伙伴声誉在网络层惯例与共同信任间中介作用更强；同时，二元关系机制在二元惯例与二元学习机制间也存在类似的中介作用。通过本文的研究，有助于网络成员利用不同的治理机制与惯例组合通过更有效的治理路径促进治理目标的实现，为创新网络中存在于不同层级的治理方式选择，提升企业持续创新能力及竞争优势的获得提供理论支持。

关键词: 跨层级视角, 网络惯例, 治理机理, HLM分析方法

Abstract:

Technology innovation network routine is a key factor to keep network stabile. Meanwhile it was the core issue to promote network knowledge information acquirement. However, we know from the existing researches on network governance mechanism based on the network governance mechanism literatures, few of them pay attention to the interaction between the different governance mechanisms. Based on the core elements of governance mechanism from network level, dual level and enterprise level and using HLM analysis research methods at different levels in practice and structure mechanism, the authors try to find the relationship between structure mechanisms, learning mechanisms from top-level to bottom-level. Our finding are as follows:macro cultural practices of the network structure mechanism play a stronger intermediary role in the relationship of network layer and reciprocal standard; partner reputation plays a stronger intermediary role in the relationship of network-level routine and mutual trust; binary relation mechanism plays a similar mediating role in the relationship of working practices and binary learning mechanism. From the cross-level perspective, we find support for the members of technology network to choose different governance mechanisms at different level to make the network aim come true. Also the study would provide theoretical support to promote enterprise's sustainable innovation ability and competitive advantage.

Key words: across-level, network routine, governance mechanism, HLM analysis method