中国碳生产率减排目标分配机制研究——基于不同环境责任界定视角

›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 137-147.

• 投入占用产出技术及其应用 • 上一篇下一篇

中国碳生产率减排目标分配机制研究——基于不同环境责任界定视角

夏炎^1,3, 吴洁²

1. 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院, 北京 100190;
2. 上海财经大学统计与管理学院, 上海 200433;
3. 中国科学院大学公共政策与管理学院, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2016-04-29 出版日期:2018-05-28 发布日期:2018-05-29
作者简介:夏炎,中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院副研究员,中国科学院大学公共政策与管理学院副研究员,博士;吴洁,上海财经大学统计与管理学院助理研究员,博士。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划（2016YFA0602800）；国家自然科学基金项目（71573248；71704100）。

Provincial Carbon Productivity Target Allocation Plan in China:Producer and Consumer Responsibility

Xia Yan^1,3, Wu Jie²

1. Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
2. School of Statistics and Management, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433;
3. School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received:2016-04-29 Online:2018-05-28 Published:2018-05-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

全球化和区域经济一体化已经引起产业分工的深度和广度不断扩大,跨地区的中间产品贸易发展迅速,产品的生产和消费环节在地理位置上分离,因此生产和消费相关的碳排放可以根据产品贸易进行转移,这就意味着不同碳排放责任下的核算,以及基于此制定的省级减排目标(如碳强度和碳生产率目标)的分配将对各省产生不同成本效益和环境责任。本文采用投入产出方法,建立多区域间投入产出模型,分析我国国内贸易和国际贸易中的隐含碳,并与目标优化方法相结合,估计各省在不同环境责任下的减排成本和减排目标调整。结果表明,消费者责任核算能够兼顾效率和公平,将欠发达地区的生产排放责任适当的分配到最终消费的较发达的消费地区,有利于减少区域间碳泄漏,提高欠发达地区的经济竞争力。碳生产率目标强调在能源效率方面重新规划减排目标,并进一步改善欠发达地区的能源效率。政策制定者可以根据能源效率和单位减排成本来分配和增加投资,并随之提高减排效率。最后根据结论提出政策建议。

关键词: 碳生产率, 环境责任, 隐含碳, 投入产出

Abstract:

Globalization and regional economic integration has caused the expansion of depth and breadth in industrial division. Due to the rapid development of interregional intermediate products trade and the geographical separation of production and consumption, the production and consumption-related emissions can be transferred with products trade, which means that the accounting of carbon emis-sions under different responsibilities, as well as the provincial emission reduction targets based on it (such as targets of carbon intensity and carbon productivity) will have different impact of cost-effectiveness and environmental responsibility on provinces. Based on the in-put-output method, this paper develops a multi-regional input-output model to analyze the embodied carbon in domestic and international trade in China. Furthermore, combined with the objective optimization method, this paper estimates the provincial abatement costs and adjustment of provincial emission reduction targets under different environmental responsibilities. The results indicate that the accounting under consumer responsibility can reconcile efficiency and equity, and appropriately transfer the responsibility for production emissions in less developed regions to developed regions, thus reducing the interregional carbon leakage and improving the economic competitiveness in less developed regions. In addition, the carbon productivity target emphasizes the re-planning of emission reduction target according to energy efficiency, and to further improve the energy efficiency in less developed regions. Policy makers can allocate and increase invest-ment according to energy efficiency and unit abatement cost, improving the efficiency of emissions reduction. Finally, policy recommen-dations are proposed based on our conclusions.

Key words: carbon productivity, environmental responsibility, embodied carbon emissions, input output analysis

夏炎, 吴洁. 中国碳生产率减排目标分配机制研究——基于不同环境责任界定视角[J]. , 2018, 30(5): 137-147.

Xia Yan, Wu Jie. Provincial Carbon Productivity Target Allocation Plan in China:Producer and Consumer Responsibility[J]. , 2018, 30(5): 137-147.

参考文献

[1] Mckerlie K., Knight N., Thorpe B. Advancing Extended Producer Responsibility in Canada[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2006,14(6-7):616-628
[2] Eder P., Narodoslawsky M. What Environmental Pressures Are a Region's Industries Responsible For? A Method of Analysis with Descriptive Indices and Input-output Models 1[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999,29(3):359-374
[3] 何建坤,苏明山. 应对全球气候变化下的碳生产率分析[J]. 中国软科学, 2009,(10):42-47
[4] 潘家华. 怎样发展中国的低碳经济[J]. 中国市场, 2010,(11):61-65
[5] 潘家华,张丽峰. 我国碳生产率区域差异性研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2011,(5):47-57
[6] IPCC. Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories[R]. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1996
[7] Xia Y., Fan Y., Yang C. Assessing The Impact of Foreign Content in China's Exports on The Carbon Outsourcing Hypothesis[J]. Applied Energy, 2015,150(10):296-307
[8] 闫云凤,赵忠秀. 中国对外贸易隐含碳的测度研究——基于碳排放责任界定的视角[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2012,(1):131-142
[9] Lenzen M., Murray J., Sack F., et al. Shared Producer and Consumer Responsibility——Theory and Practice[J]. Ecological Economics, 2007,61(1):27-42
[10] Peters G. P. From Production-based to Consumption-based National Emission Inventories[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008,65(1):13-23
[11] Choi T. Understanding Environmental Responsibility of Cities and Emissions Embodied in Trade[J]. Economic Systems Research, 2015,27(2):133-153
[12] Wiedmann T. A Review of Recent Multi-region Input-Output Models Used for Consumption-based Emission and Resource Ac-counting[J]. Ecological Economics, 2009,69(2):211-222
[13] Chen H. M. The Energy and Environment Impacts of China's International Trade[M]. Shanghai:Fudan University, 2009
[14] Dietzenbacher E., Pei J., Yang C. Trade, Production Fragmentation, and China's Carbon Dioxide Emissions[J]. Journal of En-vironmental Economics & Management, 2012,64(1):88-101
[15] Davis S. J., Caldeira K. Consumption-based Accounting of CO₂ Emissions[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010,107(12):5687-5692
[16] Bin S., Ang B. W. Input-output Analysis of CO₂, Emissions Embodied in Trade:A Multi-region Model for China[J]. Applied Energy, 2014,114(24):377-384
[17] IPCC. The Mitigation of Climate Change, Fifth Assessment Report[R]. UNFCCC, Geneva, Paris, 2014
[18] Davis S. J., Peters G. P., Caldeira K. The Supply Chain of CO₂ Emissions[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011,108(45):18554-18559
[19] Peters G. P., Andrew R., Lennox J. Constructing an Environmentally-extended Multi-regional Input-output Table Using GTAP Database[J]. Economic Systems Research, 2011,23(2):131-152
[20] 何建武,李善同. 二氧化碳减排与区域经济发展[J]. 管理评论, 2010,22(6):9-16
[21] 李娜,石敏俊,王飞. 区域差异和区域联系对中国区域政策效果的作用:基于中国八区域CGE模型[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2009,29(10):35-44
[22] 李娜,石敏俊,袁永娜. 低碳经济政策对区域发展格局演进的影响——基于动态多区域CGE模型的模拟分析[J]. 地理学报, 2010,65(12):1569-1580

中国碳生产率减排目标分配机制研究——基于不同环境责任界定视角

Provincial Carbon Productivity Target Allocation Plan in China:Producer and Consumer Responsibility

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	徐然, 高翔, 杨翠红. 电子元器件进口价格的传导效应——基于改进的投入产出价格模型[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(12): 53-62.
[2]	赵炎, 齐念念. 中心性、技术影响力与企业持续性创新——环境责任和企业韧性的调节作用[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(10): 105-117.
[3]	潘晨, 李善同, 何建武, 周鹏, 周德群. 考虑省际贸易结构的中国碳排放变化的驱动因素分析[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(1): 3-15.
[4]	张红霞, 石敏俊. 电力价格市场化的成本影响分析——基于考虑价格异质性的投入产出价格模型[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(1): 17-25.
[5]	刘红光, 张子孟, 郭杰. 中国区域间价值链中隐含的碳排放转移研究[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(9): 58-64.
[6]	张弛, 张兆国, 包莉丽. 企业环境责任与财务绩效的交互跨期影响及其作用机理研究[J]. , 2020, 32(2): 76-89.
[7]	孙天阳, 肖皓, 孟渤, 许和连. 制造业全球价值链网络的拓扑特征及影响因素——基于WWZ方法和社会网络的研究[J]. , 2018, 30(9): 49-60.
[8]	高军, 索玮岚. 科研机构科技资源投入与产出的多阶段时滞效应研究[J]. , 2018, 30(8): 69-78.
[9]	刘遵义. 投入产出分析的拓展研究探讨[J]. , 2018, 30(5): 3-8.
[10]	李善同, 何建武, 刘云中. 全球价值链视角下中国国内价值链分工测算研究[J]. , 2018, 30(5): 9-18.
[11]	张红霞, 夏明. 分工和技术进步对增加值率的影响——基于投入产出技术的分析[J]. , 2018, 30(5): 29-38,46.
[12]	陈全润. 广义平均传播长度指标及在全球生产链分析中的应用[J]. , 2018, 30(5): 39-46.
[13]	赵忠秀, 闫云凤, 裴建锁. 生产分割、区域间贸易与CO₂排放:基于IRIO模型的研究[J]. , 2018, 30(5): 47-57.
[14]	蒋雪梅, 刘轶芳. 全球价值链视角下的中、美高新技术产业出口效益及环境效应分析[J]. , 2018, 30(5): 58-63.
[15]	金继红, 居乂義. 中日贸易隐含碳排放责任分配研究[J]. , 2018, 30(5): 64-75.