组织募捐方式对员工捐赠数额的影响研究——面子倾向和权力距离的调节作用

›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 114-127.

• 组织行为与人力资源管理 • 上一篇下一篇

组织募捐方式对员工捐赠数额的影响研究——面子倾向和权力距离的调节作用

赵芬芬¹, 杜兰英², 侯俊东³

1. 湖北工业大学经济与管理学院, 武汉 430068;
2. 华中科技大学管理学院, 武汉 430074;
3. 中国地质大学(武汉)经济管理学院, 武汉 430074

收稿日期:2016-01-04 出版日期:2018-03-28 发布日期:2018-03-26
通讯作者: 赵芬芬(通讯作者),湖北工业大学经济与管理学院讲师,博士
作者简介:杜兰英,华中科技大学管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士;侯俊东,中国地质大学(武汉)经济管理学院副教授,博士
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（71704049；71472070；71572185）；湖北省教育厅人文社会科学项目（17Q066）。

The Influence of Organization Fundraising Techniques on Employees' Donation Amount: The Moderating Effect of Face Orientation and Power Distance

Zhao Fenfen¹, Du Lanying², Hou Jundong³

1. School of Economics and Management, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068;
2. School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074;
3. School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074

Received:2016-01-04 Online:2018-03-28 Published:2018-03-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用情境式问卷调查的方法探讨组织募捐方式对员工捐赠数额的影响，考察人口统计特征、面子倾向和权力距离的调节作用。共回收有效问卷601份，通过方差分析、多元线性回归分析对理论模型和研究假设进行检验，结果表明：组织募捐方式对员工捐赠数额有显著的影响；年收入、职位以及单位性质在组织募捐方式和员工捐赠数额间关系中具有调节作用；面子倾向中赢面子倾向调节作用显著，对于赢面子倾向比较高的员工，公开捐赠名单和数额他们捐赠的更多，而怕丢面子倾向调节作用不显著；权力距离调节作用不显著，但进一步分析表明，对于高权力距离感知的员工，组织者是上级时员工捐赠的更多。

关键词: 组织募捐方式, 员工捐赠数额, 面子倾向, 权力距离

Abstract:

A situational questionnaire survey is adopted to explore the influence of organization fundraising techniques on employees' donation amount. The moderating effects of demographic characteristics, face orientation and power distance are also examined. 601 valid questionnaires are collected. By the analysis of variance and multiple linear regression, the following results are obtained. The amount of employees' donation is significantly different with different fundraising techniques. Annual incomes, position and unit properties moderate the relationship between fundraising techniques and employees' donation amount. Fear of losing face doesn't have a moderating role in the relationship between fundraising techniques and the amount of donation, while win-face has a moderating role, that is, the stronger desire employees have to win face, the more they will donate when the list of donors and the amount of donations are released. The power distance doesn't play a moderating role, but the results of ANOVA show that the employees with strong perception of power distance, they donate more when the organizer is their leader than they do when the organizer is their peer.

Key words: organization fundraising techniques, employees' donation amount, face orientation, power distance

赵芬芬, 杜兰英, 侯俊东. 组织募捐方式对员工捐赠数额的影响研究——面子倾向和权力距离的调节作用[J]. , 2018, 30(3): 114-127.

Zhao Fenfen, Du Lanying, Hou Jundong. The Influence of Organization Fundraising Techniques on Employees' Donation Amount: The Moderating Effect of Face Orientation and Power Distance[J]. , 2018, 30(3): 114-127.

参考文献

[1] Nesbit R., Christensen R. K., Gossett L. M. Charitable Giving in the Public Workplace:A Framework for Understanding Employees' Philanthropic Performance[J]. Public Performance & Management Review, 2012,35(3):449-474
[2] Osili U. O., Hirt D. E., Raghavan S. Charitable Giving Inside and Outside the Workplace:The Role of Individual and Firm Characteristics[J]. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 2011,16(4):393-408
[3] 俞李莉. 中美个人捐赠的比较研究[J]. 华商, 2008,(20):128-131
[4] 毕向阳,晋军,马明洁,等. 单位动员的效力与效度:对我国城市居民"希望工程"捐款行为的社会学分析[J]. 社会学研究, 2010,25(6):149-177
[5] Keating B., Robert P., David A. United Way Contributions:Coercion, Charity or Economic Self-interest[J]. Southern Economic Journal, 1981,47(3):816-823
[6] Frey B., Meier S. Social Comparisons and Pro-social Behavior:Testing Conditional Cooperation in a Field Experiment[J]. The American Economic Review, 2004,94(5):1717-1722
[7] Carman K. G. Social Influences and the Private Provision of Public Goods:Evidence from Charitable Contributions in the Workplace[DB/OL]. http://www.rwj.harvard.edu/scholarsmaterials/carman/Social%20Influences%20Designation.pdf, 2004
[8] 朱瑞玲. "面子"压力及其因应行为[A]. 翟学伟.中国社会心理学评论(第2辑)[C]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2006
[9] 江新会,钟昌标,张强,等. 中国心理授权的一个特性:影响力导致的消极效应及其边界条件[J]. 管理评论, 2016,28(3):139-153
[10] Belk R. W. Situational Variables and Consumer Behavior[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1975,2(3):157-164
[11] Long S. H. Social Pressure and Contributions to Health Charities[J]. Public Choice, 1976,28(1):55-66
[12] List J. A., Price M. K. The Role of Social Connections in Charitable Fundraising:Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2009,69(2):160-169
[13] 孙立平,晋军,何江穗,等. 动员与参与:第三部门募捐机制个案研究[M]. 杭州:浙江人民出版社, 1999
[14] Reyniers D., Bhalla R. Reluctant Altruism and Peer Pressure in Charitable Giving[J]. Judgment and Decision Making, 2013,8(1):7-15
[15] Martin R., Randal J. How Sunday, Price, and Social Norms Influence Donation Behavior[J]. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 2009,38(5):722-727
[16] 谢晔. 利他人格和情境因素对于个体捐赠决策的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013,11(4):535-540
[17] 罗俊,叶航,汪丁丁. 捐赠动机、影响因素和激励机制:理论、实验与脑科学综述[J]. 世界经济, 2015,(7):165-192
[18] 林语堂. 吾国与吾民[M]. 台北:远景出版社, 1977
[19] Lin L., Xi D., Lueptow R. M. Public Face and Private Thrift in Chinese Consumer Behaviour[J]. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 2013,37(5):538-545
[20] Buckley P. J., Clegg J., Tan H. Cultural Awareness in Knowledge Transfer to China-the Role of Guanxi and Mianzi[J]. Journal of World Business, 2006,41(3):275-288
[21] 陈之昭. 面子心理的理论分析与实际研究[A]. 翟学伟.中国社会心理学评论(第2辑)[C]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2006
[22] Goffman E. On Face Work[J]. Psychiatry, 1955,18(3):213-231
[23] 周美伶,何友晖. 从跨文化的观点分析面子的内涵及其在社会交往中的运作[A]. 翟学伟.中国社会心理学评论(第2辑)[C]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2006
[24] Zhang X., Cao Q., Grigoriou N. Consciousness of Social Face:The Development and Validation of a Scale Measuring Desire to Gain Face Versus Fear of Losing Face[J]. The Journal of Social Psychology, 2011,151(2):129-149
[25] Ho D. Y. On the Concept of Face[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1976,81(4):867-884
[26] Hofstede G. Culture's Consequence:International Difference in Work Related Values[M]. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage Publications, 1980
[27] Dorfman P. W., Howell J. P. Dimensions of National Culture and Effective Leadership Patterns:Hofstede Revisited[J]. Advances in International Comparative Management, 1988,(3):127-150
[28] Koslowsky M., Baharav H., Schwarzwald J. Management Style as a Mediator of the Power Distance-Influence Tactics Relationship[J]. International Journal of Conflict Management, 2011,22(3):264-277
[29] 廖建桥,赵君,张永军. 权力距离对中国领导行为的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2010,7(7):988-992
[30] 张燕,怀明云. 威权式领导行为对下属组织公民行为的影响研究-下属权力距离的调节作用[J]. 管理评论, 2012,24(11):97-105
[31] Begley T. M., Lee C., Fang Y. Power Distance as a Moderator of the Relationship between Justice and Employee Outcomes in a Sample of Chinese Employees[J]. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2002,17(8):692-711
[32] Wu P. C., Chaturvedi S. The Role of Procedural Justice and Power Distance in the Relationship between High-performance Work Systems and Employee Attitudes:A Multilevel Perspective[J]. Journal of Management, 2009,35(5):1228-1247
[33] 张进美,刘武,刘天翠. 城乡居民个人慈善捐赠行为差异实证研究[J]. 社会保障研究, 2013,(4):79-85
[34] Wiepking P., James R. Why are the Oldest Less Generous? Explanations for the Unexpected Age-related Drop in Charitable Giving[J]. Aging and Society, 2012,33(3):486-510
[35] 刘武,杨晓飞,张进美. 城市居民慈善行为的群体差异[J]. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 2010, 12(5):426-432
[36] 邓玮. 城市居民慈善意识影响因子分析及动员策略[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2013,19(3):143-150
[37] Kottasz R. Differences in the Donor Behavior Characteristics of Young Affluent Males and Females:Empirical Evidence from Britain[J]. Voluntas:International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 2004,15(2):181-203
[38] 刘凤芹,卢玮静. 社会经济地位对慈善捐款行为的影响[J]. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2013,(3):113-120
[39] Leslie L.M., Snyder M., Glomb T. M. Who Gives? Multilevel Effects of Gender and Ethnicity on Workplace Charitable Giving[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2013,98(1):49-62
[40] Chou M. L. Protective and Acquisitive Face Orientation:A Person by Situation Approach to Face Dynamic in Social Interaction[D]. Doctoral Dissertation of University of Hong Kong, 1996
[41] Dash S., Bruning E., Ku G. K. The Moderating Effect of Power Distance on Perceived Interdependence and Relationship Quality in Commercial Banking:A Cross-cultural Comparison[J]. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 2006,24(5):307-326
[42] 黄敏学,廖俊云,周南. 社区体验能提升消费者的品牌忠诚吗-不同体验成分的作用与影响机制研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2015,18(3):151-160
[43] 孙谨. 基于风险厌恶和面子需求视角的顾客忠诚驱动机制分析-以中国和新加坡保险服务业为例[J]. 管理评论, 2014,26(7):115-124

组织募捐方式对员工捐赠数额的影响研究——面子倾向和权力距离的调节作用

The Influence of Organization Fundraising Techniques on Employees' Donation Amount: The Moderating Effect of Face Orientation and Power Distance

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	苗彬, 索月月, 梁英杰, 王国涛. 辱虐型领导对员工工作投入的影响研究——基于下属公平感和权力距离取向的作用[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(8): 244-254.
[2]	邱迅杰, 于桂兰, 孙轩. “赋能”还是“超载”?感知上级信任对员工主动性行为的双刃剑效应[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(1): 199-208.
[3]	胡冬青, 顾琴轩. 团队权力距离和集体主义对团队创造力影响:基于共享领导视角[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(5): 167-175.
[4]	金晓彤, 黄二帅, 徐尉. 上行比较对地位消费的影响——基于内隐人格、权力距离、比较目标的调节效应分析[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(11): 151-161.
[5]	曹倩, 王熹, 于斌. 权力距离感对捐赠和志愿服务的影响机制研究[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(10): 245-258.
[6]	包艳, 廖建桥. 权力距离研究述评与展望[J]. , 2019, 31(3): 178-192.
[7]	张光磊, 陈汇, 刘文兴. 兼爱而相诺：基于代际特征的权力距离感知差异对员工工作绩效影响的案例研究[J]. , 2018, 30(11): 289-304.
[8]	何静, 张永军. 中国情境下伦理型领导影响反生产行为的“瀑布模型”:权力距离导向的调节作用[J]. , 2017, 29(8): 179-186.
[9]	任真, 王登峰, 陆峥. 文化价值观对领导-部属关系与工作结果、心理健康的调节机制:“关系相处”和“社会交换”视角的比较[J]. , 2017, 29(3): 157-167.
[10]	王晓蓉, 彭丽芳, 李歆宇. 社会化媒体中分享旅游体验的行为研究[J]. , 2017, 29(2): 97-105.