交易费用对我国碳市场成本有效性的影响——基于国内碳交易试点间的模拟分析

›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 23-31.

交易费用对我国碳市场成本有效性的影响——基于国内碳交易试点间的模拟分析

崔连标^1,3, 段宏波^2,3, 许金华³

1. 安徽财经大学统计与应用数学学院, 蚌埠 233030;
2. 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院, 北京 100190;
3. 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所能源与环境政策研究中心, 北京 100190

收稿日期:2015-10-28 出版日期:2017-06-28 发布日期:2017-06-23
作者简介:崔连标,安徽财经大学统计与应用数学学院讲师,博士;段宏波,中国科学院大学经济与管理学院讲师,博士,博士后;许金华,中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所助理研究员,博士
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年基金项目（71503001；71503242）；安徽省教育厅人文社科重点项目（SK2015A214）

Impacts of Transaction Costs on Cost Saving Effect of Carbon Trading Market in China

Cui Lianbiao^1,3, Duan Hongbo^2,3, Xu Jinhua³

1. School of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233030;
2. School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
3. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Institute of Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190

Received:2015-10-28 Online:2017-06-28 Published:2017-06-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

交易费用的广泛存在会削弱碳市场的成本有效性。本文首先构建了一个考虑交易费用的省际碳交易机制模型，从理论层面研究交易费用与碳价、交易量等变量的均衡关系。随后，以“十二五”期间六个碳交易试点为例，从成本有效性的视角探讨交易费用对我国碳市场的影响。结论显示交易费用与均衡碳价存在正向关系、与均衡交易量间存在反向关系，每增加一单位交易费用，均衡碳价大约上升0.57元，潜在碳交易量下降0.31百万吨。交易费用的增加将会抑制参与主体的交易积极性，进而降低碳市场的成本有效性。随着边际交易费用增加，天津和上海可能会率先退出市场，特别地，当边际交易费用高达70元/吨CO₂时，碳交易市场可能失效。本研究揭示了交易费用在碳市场设计中的重要性，未来我国构建全国统一碳市场需要考虑交易费用影响。

关键词: 交易费用, 省际碳交易市场, 成本节约效应

Abstract:

Transaction costs play a significant role in cost saving of carbon trading market.In this paper,we develop an inter-provincial carbon-trading model to theoretically examine the relationships between transaction costs and equilibrium carbon price and trading volumes,and empirically analyzing the impacts of transaction costs on cost-effectiveness of China's carbon trading market.We find a positive relationship between equilibrium carbon price and transaction costs,and a negative relationship between transaction costs and trading volumes.Specifically,increase of the transaction cost by each unit leads the equilibrium price to increase by 0.57 Yuan and the trading volume to decrease by 0.31 million tons.Besides,the rising of transaction costs heavily restrains the trading initiative of market agents,then weakens the cost-effectiveness of permits trading market.As the transaction cost increases,Tianjin and Shanghai would be the first two agents staying out of the trading market;if the marginal transaction cost crosses the threshold of 70 Yuan per ton of CO₂,the trading market will be in failure.This paper emphasizes the importance of transaction costs in mechanism design of carbon trading market,and indicates the policy makers should pay attention to the transaction costs for establishing the national united carbon trading market in the future.

Key words: transaction cost, inter-provincial carbon trading market, cost saving effect

崔连标, 段宏波, 许金华. 交易费用对我国碳市场成本有效性的影响——基于国内碳交易试点间的模拟分析[J]. , 2017, 29(6): 23-31.

Cui Lianbiao, Duan Hongbo, Xu Jinhua. Impacts of Transaction Costs on Cost Saving Effect of Carbon Trading Market in China[J]. , 2017, 29(6): 23-31.

参考文献

[1] Cui L. B., Fan Y., Zhu L., et al. How Will the Emissions Trading Scheme Save Cost for Achieving China's 2020 Carbon Intensity Reduction Target?[J]. Applied Energy, 2014,136(12):1043-1052
[2] 袁永娜,石敏俊,李娜. 碳排放许可的初始分配与区域协调发展——基于多区域CGE模型的模拟分析[J]. 管理评论, 2013,25(2):43-50
[3] 吴洁,范英,夏炎,等. 碳配额初始分配方式对我国省区宏观经济及行业竞争力的影响[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(12):18-26
[4] Zhang X. L. Carbon Emissions Trading in China:The Evolution from Pilots to a Nationwide Scheme[J]. Climate Policy, 2015,15(S1):104-126
[5] 屈晓龙,李波,刘雪静. 碳限额和交易机制下考虑次品率的供应链优化研究[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(9):187-200
[6] 谢晶晶,窦祥胜. 基于合作博弈的碳配额交易价格形成机制研究[J]. 管理评论, 2016,28(2):15-24
[7] Burtraw D., Evans D.A., Krupnick A., et al. Economics of Pollution Trading for SO2 and NO x[J]. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2005,30:253-289
[8] Stavins R. N. Transaction Cost and Tradable Permits[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1995,29(2):133-148
[9] Woerdman E. Emissions Trading and Transaction Costs:Analyzing the Flaws in the Discussion[J]. Ecological Economics, 2001,38(2):293-304
[10] Jarait-Ka?ukausk J., Ka?ukauskas A. Do Transaction Costs Influence Firm Trading Behaviour in the European Emissions Trading System?[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2015,62(3):583-613
[11] Coase R. H. The Nature of the Firm[J]. Economica, 1937,4(16):386-405
[12] Coase R. H. The Problem of Social Cost[J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1960,3:1-44
[13] Williamson Q. E. Transaction Cost Economics:The Governess of Contractual Relations[J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1979,22(2):233-261
[14] Hahn R. W., Hester G. L. Marketable Permits:Lessons for Theory and Practice[J]. Ecology Law Quarterly, 1998,16(2):361-406
[15] Montero J. P. Marketable Pollution Permits with Uncertainty and Transaction Costs[J]. Resource and Energy Economics, 1998,20(1):27-50
[16] Cason T. N., Gangadharan L. Transactions Costs in Tradable Permit Markets:An Experimental Study of Pollution Market Designs[J]. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2003,23(2):145-165
[17] Gangadharan L. Transaction Costs in Pollution Markets:An Empirical Study[J]. Land Economics, 2000,76(4):601-614
[18] Zhang B., Zhang Y. L., Bi J. An Adaptive Agent-Based Modeling Approach for Analyzing the Influence of Transaction Costs on Emissions Trading Markets[J]. Environmental Modelling & SoftwareJaraithar J., Convery F., Maria C.D. Transaction Costs for Firms in the EU ETS:Lessons from Ireland[J]. Climate Policy, 2010,10(2):190-215
[19] Heindl P. The Impact of Administrative Transaction Costs in the EU Emissions Trading System[J]. Climate Policy, 2017,17(3):314-329
[20] Kerr S., Duscha V. Going to the Source:Using an Upstream Point of Regulation for Energy in a National Chinese Emissions Trading System[J]. Energy & Environment, 2015,25(3-4):593-611
[21] Lee K., Han T. W. How Vulnerable is the Emissions Market to Transaction Costs?:An ABMS Approach[J]. Energy Policy, 2016,90(3):273-286
[22] 崔连标,范英,朱磊,等. 碳排放交易对实现我国"十二五"减排目标的成本节约效应研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013,21(1):37-46
[23] Wetzelaer B. J. H. W., van der Linden N. H., Groenenberg H., et al. GHG Marginal Abatement Cost Curves for the Non-Annex I Region[R]. Report ECN-E-06-060, Energy Research Center of the Netherlands (ECN), Petten, Netherlands, 2007