消费者决策情境线索的虚位诱导效应研究——基于双属性空间启动策略模型

›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 189-201.

消费者决策情境线索的虚位诱导效应研究——基于双属性空间启动策略模型

李东进¹, 郑军^1,2, 金慧贞¹, 张初兵¹

1. 南开大学商学院, 天津 300071;
2. 延边大学经济与管理学院, 吉林 133000

收稿日期:2015-11-20 出版日期:2017-06-28 发布日期:2017-06-23
通讯作者: 郑军(通讯作者)天津南开大学商学院博士研究生,吉林延边大学经济与管理学院讲师
作者简介:李东进,天津南开大学商学院教授,博士生导师;金慧贞,天津南开大学商学院博士研究生;张初兵,天津南开大学商学院博士后,天津财经大学商学院副教授
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目（71372099）；国家自然科学基金青年项目（71502120）；中国博士后科学基金特别资助项目（2015T80216）

A Study on Phantom Decoy Effects of Consumer Decision-making Context Cue——Based on Priming Strategy Model in Double Attribute Space

Li Dongjin¹, Zheng Jun^1,2, Jin Huizhen¹, Zhang Chubing¹

1. School of Business, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071;
2. School of Economics and Management, Yanbian University, Jilin 133000

Received:2015-11-20 Online:2017-06-28 Published:2017-06-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

随着国内饥饿营销、团购、秒杀等一系列虚位营销方式的兴起，在选择集中呈现一个不可得的虚位选项，会使某一可得选项吸引力增加，从而引发消费者的偏好发生反转的营销策略应用更加广泛。因此，虚位诱导效应作为吸引力效应的一个重要理论分支，完善和探究虚位诱导效应的影响及内在机制的理论框架和应用有助于丰富吸引力效应相关理论和提供虚位营销的实践建议。本文基于吸引力效应的真实诱导效应的相关理论框架及启动策略模型，构建了由虚位不对称占优诱导区（PAD）和虚位非占优诱导区（PND）组成的虚位诱导效应启动策略模型，并首次提出了PND诱导区的虚位折衷诱导项（PC）和虚位次优诱导项（PI）两种启动策略类型。基于中国消费者决策情境，运用著名E-Prime心理学实验软件设计消费者决策实验，实证结果表明在吸引力效应双属性空间博弈模型中，同样存在着与真实诱导效应相对应的PAD诱导区和PND诱导区及其启动策略类型，明晰了虚位诱导效应在未来的研究思路及理论框架。

关键词: 吸引力效应, 虚位诱导效应, 虚位折衷诱导项, 虚位次优诱导项, 虚位营销

Abstract:

With the rising of phantom marketing in Chinese market,such as hunger marketing,group purchase,sec-killing and so on,the marketing strategies that present an unavailable phantom decoy in choice set to make an available option more attractive and cause the consumer preference reversal are being widely applied.However,the theory and practice of phantom decoy effects,as an important theoretical branch of attraction effects,has not been fully developed.Based on the theoretical framework of attraction effects,this paper proposes PAD and PND decoy areas and its priming models.For the first time it proposes two types of PND priming strategies:PC and PI.Furthermore,it designs an experiment of consumer decision-making based on Chinese consumer decision-making context cue using the famous psychology experiment software named as E-prime.The results show that in the gambling model of attraction effects in double attribute space,corresponding to real effects,there exists PAD and PND decoy areas and its priming models,hence being of great significance for theoretical applications in the future research.

Key words: attraction effects, phantom decoy effects, phantom compromise decoy, phantom inferior decoy, phantom marketing

李东进, 郑军, 金慧贞, 张初兵. 消费者决策情境线索的虚位诱导效应研究——基于双属性空间启动策略模型[J]. , 2017, 29(6): 189-201.

Li Dongjin, Zheng Jun, Jin Huizhen, Zhang Chubing. A Study on Phantom Decoy Effects of Consumer Decision-making Context Cue——Based on Priming Strategy Model in Double Attribute Space[J]. , 2017, 29(6): 189-201.

参考文献

[1] Pratkanis A. R., Farquhar P. H. A Brief History of Research on Phantom Alternatives:Evidence for Seven Empirical Generalizations about Phantoms[J]. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1992,13(1):103-122
[2] Farquhar P. H., Pratkanis A. R. Decision Structuring with Phantom Alternatives[J]. Management Science, 1993,39(10):1214-1226
[3] 孙洪杰,周庭锐. 基于情境线索的属性趋同效应研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2012,15(4):48-54
[4] 张全成,杨皖,周庭锐. 吸引效应下的消费者支付意愿及决策满意度探析[J]. 管理世界, 2012,12(10):182-183
[5] 孙洪杰,周庭锐. 多元选择集结构对消费行为影响机理——体系重构与研究进展[J]. 预测, 2011,30(6):8-12
[6] Huber J., Payne J. W., Puto C. P. Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives:Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1982,9(1):90-98
[7] Colman A. M., Pulford B. D., Bolger F. Asymmetric Dominance and Phantom Decoy Effects in Games[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2007,104(2):193-206
[8] Huber J., Payne J. W., Puto C. P. Let's be Honest about the Attraction Effect[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2014,51(4):520-525
[9] Simonson I. Vices and Virtues of Misguided Replications:The Case of Asymmetric Dominance[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2014,51(4):514-519
[10] Sellers-Rubio R., Nicolau-Gonzalbez J. L. Testing the Decoy Effect in the Presence of Store Brands[J]. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 2015,43(2):113-125
[11] Scarpi D., Pizzi G. The Impact of Phantom Decoys on Choices and Perceptions[J]. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2013,26(5):451-461
[12] Pettibone J. C. Testing the Effect of Time Pressure on Asymmetric Dominance and Compromise Decoys in Choice[J]. Judgment and Decision Making, 2012,7(4):513-523
[13] Tan K., Dong S., Liu X., et al. Phantom Alternatives Influence Food Preferences in the Eastern Honeybee Apis Cerana[J]. Journal of Animal Ecology, 2015,84(2):509-517
[14] Pettibone J. C., Wedell D. H. Examining Models of Nondominated Decoy Effects across Judgment and Choice[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2000,81(2):300-328
[15] Pettibone J. C., Wedell D. H. Testing Alternative Explanations of Phantom Decoy Effects[J]. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2007,20(3):323-341
[16] 孙瑾. 属性可比性对消费者品牌评价的影响:评价模式的调节作用[J]. 管理评论, 2011,23(8):103-111
[17] 孙瑾. 消费者对比决策过程研究:专业化水平和购买情境的调节作用[J]. 管理评论, 2014,26(9):191-198
[18] Connolly T., Reb J., Kausel E. E. Regret Salience and Accountability in the Decoy Effect[J]. Judgment and Decision Making, 2013,8(2):136-149
[19] 李研,李东进. 购物情境中的产品虚位现象研究述评[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2013,35(5):72-79
[20] Tversky A., Simonson I. Context-Dependent Preferences[J]. Management Science, 1993,39(10):1179-1189
[21] Slaughter J. E., Kausel E. E., Quiñones M. A. The Decoy Effect as a Covert Influence Tactic[J]. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2011,24(3):249-266
[22] Simonson I. Choice Based on Reasons:The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1989:158-174