内隐领导原型对领导有效性的影响机制——领导信任的中介效应和上下级沟通频率的调节效应

›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 75-86.

• 组织行为与人力资源管理 • 上一篇下一篇

内隐领导原型对领导有效性的影响机制——领导信任的中介效应和上下级沟通频率的调节效应

张祥润¹, 王宗水¹, 时勘^1,2, 赵红¹

1. 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院, 北京 100190;
2. 中国人民大学心理学系, 北京 100872

收稿日期:2014-10-14 出版日期:2017-05-28 发布日期:2017-05-26
作者简介:张祥润,中国科学院大学经济与管理学院博士研究生;王宗水,中国科学院大学经济与管理学院博士研究生;时勘,中国科学院大学经济与管理学院,中国人民大学心理学系教授,博士生导师,博士;赵红,中国科学院大学经济与管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士。

The Mediating Effect of Trust in Leader and the Moderating Effect of Frequency of Leader-Follower Interaction on the Relationship between Implicit Leadership Prototype and Leadership Effectiveness

Jang Sangyoon¹, Wang Zongshui¹, Shi Kan^1,2, Zhao Hong¹

1. School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
2. Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872

Received:2014-10-14 Online:2017-05-28 Published:2017-05-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本研究以10家制造业企业中的216名员工为研究对象，采用层级回归分析，探讨了领导实际行为与内隐领导原型的差距对员工工作满意度和组织承诺的影响，并检验了领导信任的中介作用和上下级沟通频率的调节作用。研究结果表明：领导实际行为与内隐领导原型的差距对员工工作满意度和组织承诺存在显著的负向影响；领导实际行为与内隐领导原型的差距对领导信任存在显著的负向影响；领导信任对领导实际行为与内隐领导原型的差距影响工作满意度和组织承诺的过程具有显著的中介作用；上下级沟通频率在领导实际行为与内隐领导原型的差距与领导信任之间具有显著的调节作用。

关键词: 内隐领导理论, 领导信任, 上下级沟通频率, 领导有效性

Abstract:

The objectives of this study are to examine the relationship between leader behavior-implicit leadership prototype difference, job satisfaction and organizational commitment, and to investigate the mediating effect of trust in leader and the moderate effect of leader-follower interaction frequency. To achieve this purpose, the data collected from 216 employees who work for manufacturing corporations is used for hierarchical regression analysis. The results show that:First, leader behavior-implicit leadership prototype difference has a significant negative effect on job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Second, leader behavior-implicit leadership prototype difference has a significant negative effect on trust in leader. Third, leader behavior-implicit leadership prototype difference has a significant indirect effect on job satisfaction and organizational commitment with mediation effect of trust in leader. Forth, frequency of leader-follower interaction has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between leader behavior-implicit leadership prototype difference and trust in leader.

Key words: implicit leadership theory, trust in leader, leader-follower interaction frequency, leadership effectiveness

张祥润, 王宗水, 时勘, 赵红. 内隐领导原型对领导有效性的影响机制——领导信任的中介效应和上下级沟通频率的调节效应[J]. , 2017, 29(5): 75-86.

Jang Sangyoon, Wang Zongshui, Shi Kan, Zhao Hong. The Mediating Effect of Trust in Leader and the Moderating Effect of Frequency of Leader-Follower Interaction on the Relationship between Implicit Leadership Prototype and Leadership Effectiveness[J]. , 2017, 29(5): 75-86.

参考文献

[1] House R. J., Aditya R. N. The Social Scientific Study of Leadership: Quo Vadis?[J]. Journal of Management, 1997,23(3):409-473
[2] 李秀娟,魏峰. 打开领导有效性的黑箱: 领导行为和领导下属关系研究[J]. 管理世界, 2006,(9):87-94
[3] Lord R. G., Foti R. J., De Vader C. L. A Test of Leadership Categorization Theory: Internal Structure, Information Processing, and Leadership Perceptions[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1984,34(3):343-378
[4] 李超平. 变革型领导与团队效能:团队内合作的跨层中介作用[J]. 管理评论, 2014,26(4):73-81
[5] 张燕,怀明云. 威权式领导行为对下属组织公民行为的影响研究:下属权力距离的调节作用[J]. 管理评论, 2012,24(11):97-105
[6] Van Quaquebeke N., Van Knippenberga D., Brodbeckb F. C. More than Meets The Eye: The Role of Subordinates' Self-Perceptions In Leader Categorization Processes[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2011,22(2):367-382
[7] Carnes A., Houghton J. D., Ellison C. N. What Matters Most in Leader Selection? The Role of Personality And Implicit Leadership Theories[J]. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 2015,36(4):1-36
[8] Subramaniam A., Othman R., Sambasivan M. Implicit Leadership Theory among Malaysian Managers Impact of The Leadership Expectation Gap on Leader-Member Exchange Quality[J]. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 2010,31(4):351-371
[9] Coyle P. T., Foti R. If You ‘Re not with Me You're…? Examining Prototypes and Cooperation in Leader-Follower Relationships[J]. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 2015,22(2):161-174
[10] McAllister D. J. Affect and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1995,38(1):24-59
[11] Popper M. Leader Perceived as Distant and Close. Some Implications for Psychological Theory on Leadership[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2013,24(24):1-8
[12] Eden D., Levitan U. Implicit Leadership Theory as A Determinant of The Factor Structure Underlying Supervisory Behavior Scales[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,1975,60(6):736-741
[13] Yukl G. Leadership in organizations[M]. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall,1989
[14] 杨梅.内隐领导原型差异对领导信任度及组织承诺的影响作用分析[D]. 河南大学硕士学位论文, 2010
[15] Tse H. H. M. Huang X., Lam W. Why Does Transformational Leadership Matter for Employee Turnover? A Multi-Foci Social Exchange Perspective[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2013,24(5):763-776
[16] Blau P. Exchange and Power In Social Life[M]. New York: Wiley,1964
[17] Chang C. H., Ferris D. L., Johnson R. E., et al. Core Self-evaluations: A Review and Evaluation of The Literature[J]. Journal of Management, 2012,38(1):81-128
[18] 封子奇,王雪,金盛华,等. 领导力的社会认同理论: 主要内容及研究进展[J]. 心理学探新, 2014,34(2):166-171
[19] 仲理峰,周霓裳,董翔,等. 领导-部属交换对领导和部属工作结果的双向影响机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009,17(5):1041-1050
[20] 严进,付琛,郑玫. 组织中上下级值得信任的行为研究[J]. 管理评论, 2011,23(2):99-106
[21] Grant C B. Uncertainty and Communication[M]. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2007
[22] Hoppock R. Job Satisfaction[M]. New York: Harper and Brothers,1935
[23] Mowday R. T., Steers R. M., Porter L. W. The Measurement of Organizational Commitment[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1979,14(2):224-247
[24] 郑晓涛,石金涛,郑兴山. 员工组织内信任对其工作态度的影响[J]. 管理评论, 2008,20(11):36-40
[25] Judge T. A., Locke E. A., Durham C. C. The Dispositional Causes of Job Satisfaction: A Core Evaluations Approach[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior,1997,19(1):151-188
[26] Bono J. E., Colbert A. E. Understanding Response to Multi-Source Feedback: The Role of Core Self-Evaluations[J]. Personnel Psychology,2005,58(1):171-203
[27] Erez A., Judge T. A. Relationship of Core Self-Evaluations to Goal Setting, Motivation, and Performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001,86(6):1270-1279
[28] Rousseau D. M., Sitkin S. B., Burt R. S., et al. Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1998,2(3):393-404
[29] Shawn Burke C., Sims D. E., Lazzara E. H., Salas E. Trust in Leadership: A Multi-Level Review and Integration[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2007,18(6):606-632
[30] Raven B., Rubin J. Social Psychology: People in Groups[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1976
[31] Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., Schoorman F. D. An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1995,20(20):709-734
[32] Uhl-Bien M. Relational Leadership Theory: Exploring The Social Processes of Leadership and Organization[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2006,17(6):654-676
[33] Pierro A., Cicero L. Higgins E. T. Follower's Satisfaction from Working with Group-Prototypic Leaders: Promotion Focus as Moderator[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2009,45(5):1105-1110
[34] Brashers D. E. Communication and Uncertainty Management[J]. Journal of Communication, 2001,51(3):477-497
[35] House R. J., Hanges P. J., Ruiz-Quintanilla S. A., et al. Cultural Influences on Leadership and Organizations: Project Globe[J]. Advances in Global Leadership,1999,1(1):171-233
[36] Epitropaki O., Martin R. From Ideal to Real: A Longitudinal Study of The Role of Implicit Leadership Theories on Leader-Member Exchanges and Employee Outcomes[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005,90(4):659-676
[37] Edwards J. R. The Study Of Congruence in Organizational Behavior Research: Critique and A Proposed Alternative[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1994,58(1):51-100
[38] Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Moorman R. H., Fetter R. Transformational Leader Behaviors and Their Effects on Followers' Trust in Leader, Satisfaction, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 1990,1(2):107-142
[39] Cammann C., Fichman M., Jenkins D., et al. The Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire[R]. University of Michigan,Working Paper, 1979
[40] Meyer J. P., Allen N. J., Smith C. A. Commitment to Organizations and Occupations: Extension and Test of A Three Component Conceptualization[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993,78(4):538-551
[41] Kacmar K. M., Witt L. A., Zivnuska S., et al. The Interactive Effect of Leader-Member Exchange and Communication Frequency on Performance Ratings[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003,88(4):764-772
[42] 曾垂凯. 情感承诺对LMX与员工离职意向关系的影响[J]. 管理评论, 2012,24(11):106-113
[43] Rockwell R. C. Assessment of Multicolinearity: The Haitovsky Test of The Determinant[J]. Sociological Methods and Research, 1975,3(3):308-320
[44] Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986,51(6):1173-1182
[45] Aiken L. S., West S. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions[M]. New York: Sage, 1991

内隐领导原型对领导有效性的影响机制——领导信任的中介效应和上下级沟通频率的调节效应

The Mediating Effect of Trust in Leader and the Moderating Effect of Frequency of Leader-Follower Interaction on the Relationship between Implicit Leadership Prototype and Leadership Effectiveness

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	徐云飞, 席猛, 赵曙明. 包容性领导对员工主动行为的影响机制——基于社会影响理论的视角[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(6): 201-212.
[2]	张永军. 伦理型领导与员工反生产行为:领导信任、领导认同与传统性的作用[J]. , 2017, 29(12): 106-115.